Yeah I thought so too. I don't think any fair score could have Bradley winning. 7-5 is the MOST i think you could legit score this fight for Bradley.
The ring have always been very favourable to Bradley, the way Doug Fischer talks about him in his weekly mailbags ud think he was his love child
Round 1 - Bradley - Close Round 2 - Pacquiao Round 3 - Pacquiao Round 4 - Bradley Round 5 - Pacquiao - Close Round 6 - Pacquiao Round 7 - Pacquiao Round 8 - Pacquiao Round 9 - Pacquiao Round 10 - Pacquiao Round 11 - Bradley Round 12 - Pacquiao 117-111, could be be 116-112
even if bradley scored the fight he would still have pac winning by at least 1 round. JMM or Floyd must have scored the fight for ring magazine lol
Only *****'s & affiliated arse suckers could have scored that fight a draw, easy 8/4 to Pac & 7/5 to Pac if yer watched it braille.
Not always. Actually most of the time they are somewhat neutral. They report about a lot of TR fighters and events. Of course some of GBP fighters get BS rankings in the P4P scale but thats because it´s one guy making the final decision (i dont remember his name). At strawweight they had as the nr 1 guy and now nr 2 Wanheng Menayothin. Guy has not beaten anyone of not and just has a good record 33-0
Well, zero punches landed means zero progress in the "clean, effective punching" aspect of scoring. After that, it comes down to "defense" and "ring generalship," in which case the guy evading the shots gets credit for, surpassing the guy who didn't land anything in the judging criteria. As long as the evading fighter is throwing and partially landing or landing glancing blows, it's enough to take rounds where no even remotely big or solid shots connect.
Yeah, that dude has stood out in their 105 pound rankings ever since he showed up on the list. One of their worst rankings at the moment, honestly (and that is saying something).