Ring to put Floyd at 1 and Pacquiao at 2

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thatman, Jun 13, 2012.


  1. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    good decision by the ring there.

    you can't argue the fact that out of about 100 reporters that scored the fight. 98% scored it for Manny. only 2%scoring it a draw or a bradley win.

    It honestly doesnt get more of a robbery than that.

    Bradley hast denied that he told Arum that he lost straight after the fight either.

    This may get ruled a NC.
     
  2. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    What ******ed nonsense is this.

    There excuse for not demoting pac after the marquez fight was although many people believed he lost, Pac OFFICIALLY got the win hence we leave pac where he is.

    Now they changing their tune again with although Bradley OFFICIALLY won we know Pac really won hence we won't demote pac.

    Ring rankings has officially lost any credibility it still had.
     
  3. Da Boxer

    Da Boxer Cotto Soldier Full Member

    1,798
    2
    Nov 3, 2011
    I re-read your original post and I understood now. You are saying that Pac looked better against Bradley than FMJr vs Cotto. Got it. My missread.
     
  4. Sunchild78

    Sunchild78 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,721
    50
    Sep 25, 2009
    Floyd should of been number 1 since he came back out of retirement. He's been consitent with his victories since he became pro. He wasn't a hype job nor did he ride the back of another fighter to make him a star. Pac on the other hand has been KO twice, lost to Marquez twice, Morales and now Bradley (which I believe he should of won considering he fought Bradley better then he did Marquez) Floyd is no doubt the #1 p4p of the sport.
     
  5. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,962
    3,344
    Apr 26, 2010
    Right, but you're also semi ******ed, obviously.