Ring website slams Pac/Marquez 3

Like I said, there is NO clear argument to be made for Pacquiao over Floyd P4P.

 

:deal

 

Wins over Mosley and JMM (moving up two weight classes)

vs.

Wins over Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito and Mosley.


I agree there is no argument, because there is none to be made. The choice is perfectly clear to most sane people.

 

Yeah, maybe they can find a *147lb* fighter who has two wins in a row for their next fight...

 

Better resume?

What has Pacquaio done since the Morales loss?

 

What a bunch of BS.

You're just suffering from a severe case of butthurtitis after you picked your two fav fighters (cotto and Margo) to beat Pac only to end up seeing them take the biggest beating of their careers, that and some stupid beef you have with Roach from your days at the Wildcard is why you hate Pac and now side with Floyd the rest is just some **** you're trying to sell us but you're not fooling anyone(well maybe some *****s).

 

IIRC, Floyd beat Hatton and Mosley *first*.

Clottey was coming off of a LOSS.

Cotto, Hatton, and Margarito were all ONE FIGHT REMOVED from being BRUTALLY KO'ed.

There's no way you can justify rating Pacquiao over Mayweather based on these wins.

No Way...

 

Clottey, Cotto and Mosley were all ranked in the top 5 at 147. Margarito was ****ing Middleweight come fight night. I don't really understand the signifigance of this "they must have won their last two fights or Manny's win is meaningless" criteria that you're suddenly suggesting. Does the same criteria apply to FMJ's body of work @147?

 

the beatdown Pacquiao laid on Margarito pushed him to join the dark side.

 

Again, I fail to see the signifigance of any of this. These are meaningless statements and a criteria that can equally be used to tear-apart Floyd's body of work at 147.

The bottom line for me is that points wins over JMM and Mosley are not as good as destroying Hatton, stopping Cotto, dominating Mosley and Clottey and beating the **** out of a guy who outweighs you by 20lbs. You literally have to be lying or deluded to think otherwise.

 

See what happens when you speak the real ESB, you leave them to make remarks like that that have nothing to do with the truth....

India, I am staying real with it, Again you know as you stated early I use to give Floyd all kinds of ****, So why should I limit it to just Floyd? That would make me a hater, and a casual fan not a true fan of the sport.....

Forget it explaining reality to you is pointless....

 

You can't be serious.

There is ALL kinds of taint on each of those wins.

Catch weight, weight drained, rehydration clause, year long layoff, and being _one fight removed from a brutal KO_ is all you need to know here.

There is a shitload of taint on this "fight".

Its called fighting the BEST OPPOSITION available. Guys who are 1-1 in their last two obviously don't fit that description.

Damn straight it does...

 

WTF are you talking about?

Did Floyd not have a career before the JMM and SSM fights?

Honestly, what has Pacquaio done since the Morales loss to warrant a P4P rating above Mayweather?

The Hatton, Cotto, Mosley, and Clottey wins are covered in all kinds of TAINT.

 

What you call "taint" I call "excuses."

So Manny wipes out the lineal 140lbs champ at his best weight in two rounds, stops the #3 ranked WW (both of these guys are P4P elite, by the way) dominates two top five guys in Mosley and Clottey, and beats the crap out of a Middleweight, but you don't think any of this is any good? Wow, you really are hard to please.

But fine, that's cool. So, tell me why FMJ's wins over JMM and Mosley are better than the facts stated above? Make your case. I think a lot of people will be eager to see it.

 

Hmmmmm....

Floyd holds the legitimate linear title @ 147lbs.

Meanwhile, Pacquaio holds the worthless WBO trinket he won IN A CATCHWEIGHT FIGHT.

Going forward, the Cotto fight should be ignored when considering Pacquiao's body of work @ welterweight seeing as that fight was NOT contested @ the 147lb weight limit.