Ring's May 2017 Issue The Greatest All Time Heavyweights.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Feb 18, 2019.


Page 3 of 3
  1. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,095
    Oct 28, 2017
    Trouble is resume kind of hinges on a H2H rating of the era, of some sort at least
     
    BitPlayerVesti, Feb 20, 2019
    BitPlayerVesti, Feb 20, 2019
    #31
  2. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,089
    15,548
    Dec 20, 2006
    I didn’t think so either until you started talking about sociological impact as if outside of the ring etc mattered?

    Oh well...it’s been real...and it’s beem fun...but it hasn’t been real fun
     
    PhillyPhan69, Feb 20, 2019
    PhillyPhan69, Feb 20, 2019
    #32
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,301
    9,161
    Jul 15, 2008
    No harm no foul.
     
    he grant, Feb 20, 2019
    he grant, Feb 20, 2019
    #33
  4. Jason Thomas

    Jason Thomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,344
    5,114
    Feb 18, 2019
    Doesn't it matter if h2h really happened or not. If the two are in the same era and A beats B, okay. But if X is in the 1930's and Y in the 1960's, any h2h consideration is just guesswork.
     
    Jason Thomas, Feb 20, 2019
    Jason Thomas, Feb 20, 2019
    #34
Page 3 of 3