RJJ record V FMJ record

Yes...he got his ass beat according to you

BTW, for the second time, it was a very controversial decision. He floored Hill and had his way for long stretches. Don't wanna say it was hometown cooking but...you would have to watch the fight to know what I mean.

 

You haven't provided one reason as to why Floyd is better.

Toney and Hopkins give Jones a big edge out of the gate.

Add Hill, Sosa, McCallum, Gonzalez, Valle, Ruiz, Thorton was a good fighter back in his day as well. Griffin higher than everyone on Floyd's resume. Yes Diego was a beast at the time and Griffin comes close to that win for Floyd in my opinion.

 

It's funny how times and a few humbling losses changes things. The same criticisms that Floyd gets Roy used to get x10. No one here was following boxing during the "Roycott" and the saga with Darius.

 

W have a winner!

 

Let me ask you a question?
Did Hills beat Devalles?

Your last straw, you better try hard!

 

I haven't provided? How about the fact that Floyd has never lost?

 

Yes. And Rios beat Abril. And De La Hoya-Mayweather was really a split decision.

 

yes Floyd has never lost but we are talking about resume and if Floyd has any wins compared to Jones win over Bhop and Toney.

 

Answer the question.

Unless you suggest that it was a robbery. And if thats the case provide a source of the so call "robbery".

 

atsch Posts like this show you aren't smart enough to engage in a real boxing discussion. Why would Floyd, not having a loss vs. VASTLY different competition, indicate his resume is better? I know I am wasting my time asking this, but do you even understand WHY this reason you post means nothing? If both guys fought the exact same guys, and one walked away with more wins, ONLY THEN would this simple explanantion carry water. I doubt you get it.

Jeez...there is nothing worse then a poster who doesn't realize their logic isn't sound or applicable.

 

I did. Try reading.

BTW I actually watched the fight. I suggest you do the same. Because if you go by boxrec, then Mayweather was lucky to win a decision against Oscar. And boxrec is my source for that

 

How predictable can you be?
Bhop was green at the time. Bhop said so himself as well. If you choose not to agree, then you should know that Bhop gotten a lot better after his loss with jones and eventually reached his peak. He was not peaking when he fought JOnes. So don't you think there is something wrong already if the only two names that you keep thowing out is BHOP AND TONEY? That should be enough WARNING for any ****** to back off of this debate.

TONEY was drained again two great wins and both had something wrong with them. hint. You are probably not going to win this debate but is your call.

Cause sounds like to me you are really just riding on Toney now. And to suggest there is not one person that FLoyd has fought that is at Toney's skill level is flat out ridiculous.

 

Toney was always "drained." It was only an excuse when he lost to Roy.

 

I have thrown out several names throughout the tread and Bhop and Toney are the names the Op suggested. Pay attention. Oh and Jones going up to fight Ruiz shits on Chavez, Baldomire, Corley, Ortiz, and Guerrero, Mitchell as well.

 

You may watched the fight but you have no common sense, no boxing knowledge, and blind. You can't even tell which boxer is bigger and too ****ing lazy to conduct resource so tell me how are you credible?