RJJ will go down in history as better than Floyd

He surely doesn't think valero>pep? Surely?

 

Better than Floyd at what????Boxing!!I think not.

I love RJJ,but for all he had goin for him,when it broke it broke.You could say he was exposed even.

Under no circumstances will it get that ugly for Floyd.Why?Because Floyd is better than RJJ.A better boxer and a better thinker.

Just look at 36.RJJ was gettin embarrassed and Floyd is puttin out virtuoso performances.Not even Close.Floyd all day.

 

Quote me on what i said about valero's being better? did i say that he have a better resume or that he will kick his ass?


My record speak for itself. everyone knows i am good at picking winners.

 

This really shows the mentality of this board.

Most boxing analysts have SRR clearly number one. Others who are close include Greb, Armstrong, Langford, Ali and Louis.

But I guess on general no one gets beyond the last 10 years. Tyson usually is lucky to make it into the top 10 ATG heavyweights, never mind ATG p4p.

That said, they're all great fighters, but in the history of the sport, there are many who are better.

 

exactly. Even Bhop resume > Roy's

and for the people who thinks Roy resume is better than SRL???? SMFH

 

Your posting history doesnt go that far.

But yes you said Valero was better than Willie Pep.

That Pep's resume was fill with bums and that Valero would have stopped him.

if you changed your mind good it proves you're not as dumb as i thought.

And that you can learn with time by studying past fighters.

Instead of just talking out of your arse.

 

Now i dont know it seems like he finally has figured out how ridiculous that was but he used to think that way back in the day.

 

Pep did fight a lot of bums.
Valero doesn't have a better resume and i know i've told you this 5 times already but there is no doubt in my mind he would run pep out of the ring.

 

You are the one to talk.

You post non-sense everyday.

 

YDKSAB.

I'm embarrassed for you.

Log Off and get Valero'ed.

 

Valero wouldn't lay a glove on pep.

Pep was only handled by those who were a heck of a lot bigger and could manhandle him on the inside (the clutch, saddler) other then that he was barely punched.

Valero is not on that level. I remember his hype and I thought he would go far but he never actually proved himself at a high level. Pep is absolutely one of the best fighters in filmed history and Valero loses wide points.

 

You are dumb as **** and which is why you should stayed away from gambling. I know you are a gullible hype following poser, who just want to toss some big names in the past and overhype like a lot of people do on here.

I'll give you something to think about.

Pep fought nothing but bums and suffers his first loss at the hands of this guy.

1943-03-19Sammy Angott

This content is protected

-

This content is protected

-

This content is protected

Madison Square Garden, New York, New York, USALUD1010


And you don't think Valero can do better than Sammy?

Valero can box and he got heavy hands. Pep only got a bike. His bike doesn't make him unbeatable either.

Pep got beat by C-B- level fighters so assuming that Valeros IS A B level fighter will mean that HE WILL HAVE A GREAT CHANCE OF BEATING PEP. IF Valero is a A level boxer (imo he is) He would've run Pep out of the ring.

Pep today would've been label a bum

 

That was truly embarrassing. You talk about one of the greatest lightweights in history as if he is a nobody :'(

 

If you want to be foolish, the same could be said of anything.. But I choose to think with my brain and not my ass.:yep

 

Angott is a hall of famer.

And is one of the best lightweights ever.

Has better wins in his record than any fighter around today.

Comparing him to Valero is like comparing Arturo Gatti to Ike Williams.

What you did was Self -Ownage at its finest.

Way to go dumbass.

If there was any doubts left about your lack of knowledge.

They are gone after that horrible post.

Just Log Off.