Roach insists on pre-fight Mosley drug test

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mr.Opal, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. causality

    causality Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,096
    1
    Jun 8, 2010
    See how the *****s don't really care about blood tests. They're just like zombies repeating what the Sr. and Jr. say no matter how stupid. :-:)-(
     
  2. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,499
    14,049
    Mar 5, 2006
    won't matter..the mosley/pac fight will be in dallas stadium.
     
  3. Jaguar

    Jaguar Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,181
    1
    May 12, 2005
    :deal

    These *******s do not understand logic.

    1. Team Pacquiao says that they will not submit to any additional testing. They deem NSAC testing (a post-fight urine test) adequate.

    2. Roach says that they will require at least one additional test from Shane Mosley should they fight.

    Hypocrisy at its finest.
     
  4. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,499
    14,049
    Mar 5, 2006
    Roach is an idiot. Roach doesn't sign or make the contracts. Roach talks out of his ass.
     
  5. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    naw man that is too complicated for them
     
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Ok guys lets get this straight. Us Mayweather supporters are not hypocrites. We'd have no problem with Roach asking the NSAC for additional tests for Mosley IF Team Pacquiap didn't ***** to Floyd and end negotiations because he asked the NSAC to do addational testing. Then to top it off, Manny won't be taking the additional tests himself
     
  7. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    :lol::lol::lol:......:nono
     
  8. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    8 oz gloves
    ring size
    10 million dollar weight penalty
    NSAC to do the testing
    14 day cutoff
    :deal
    Are you laughing because you know this is a ***** victory?
     
  9. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    ***** VICTORY :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  10. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    And negotiation never took place the last time. :lol:
     
  11. causality

    causality Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,096
    1
    Jun 8, 2010
    Do you honestly believe those are facts? If so, you are one big idiot. I won't tell why. :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  12. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    Floyd never agreed to NSAC and the 14 day offer was never serious :lol:....silly *****. Props to Floyd for agreeing to 147 instead of his initial proposal at 154.

    For Pac, he gave Floyd top billing, agreed for the fight to be in Vegas.

    ....here's a compromise for you.


     
  13. Jack Kollin

    Jack Kollin Say my name? Full Member

    1,786
    0
    Oct 22, 2010
    Still stucked with the drug testing issue *****s!? Why dont you defend what's your idol doing nowadays, Where the hell he is and what the f..k he's doing to make this fight happen NOW.. DECEMBER 2010....
     
  14. unsigned_userv2

    unsigned_userv2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,138
    0
    Sep 3, 2010
    Why are comments like this still tolerated?
     
  15. Real_Truth

    Real_Truth Guest

    Look idiot. I'm not gonna be bitching if Mosley decided not to take it. If Mosley only wants to take what the commission wants and the fight doesn't happen, then that's fine. But we all know Mosley is gonna bend over to Pac's demands cuz he wants the money. If Mosley is fine by it, then what's you guys' problem? Again if Pac takes the same test as Mosley does, then that should pretty much say he isn't on PED's. I will, however, have a big problem if they only ask Mosley and Pac doesn't have to take the same tests.

    I'm not an idiot who follow Pac blindly and can't see the wrong that he's doing. I'm not gonna defend him should he pull **** like my second scenario. I'm not so weak minded that I'm gonna defend a man even though he is obviously wrong. I'll leave that to you *****s :hi: