Roach knows of two of his fighters who tested positive for PEDs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rapid, Mar 12, 2010.


  1. It doesn't take a magnifying glass to spot a lying mu****a.
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    and *****s starting a thread about it. :-(
     
  3. stiga

    stiga Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    May 27, 2009
  4. gyll

    gyll Undetectable Full Member

    5,882
    0
    Jan 27, 2010
    Not to sound like a skeptical ***** but I don't see how this interview is convincing. Roach isn't exactly showing rebuke towards Toney. He's seemingly so nonchalant about Toney being guilty of juicing.
     
  5. Bajingo

    Bajingo Boxing Junkie banned

    14,050
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    why does it censor ****** fortune?
     
  6. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    He wont be the first, mosley will. So i guess Pac wont have any problem taking the test if the fight presents itself again then?
     
  7. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    his actions and statements aren't suspicious in the least, basically all you have said is that Pac is no more guilty or suspicious than any other clean fighter
     
  8. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    asking roach is pac is on PED's is like asking the O if J is a murderer
     
  9. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    The only people they seem to catch with post fight drug testing are pot heads and ignorant jackasses. Usually by the time they test the fighter has already used a masking agent and is cycling off.

    Anyways, Roach seems to just make Pacquiao look worse with every interview he does. I mean, even if Pacquiao is clean or not, I wouldn't be doing interviews about PEDs if I was him.