imo he was exposed by barker more than macklin. don't give him a chance to counter you & he isn't a great danger. both barker & macklin showed you can take him out of his game fairly easily. saying that; macklin should have been a world champ going into that fight...he did well for a bit then got stopped after taking a bit of a beating. that's actually pretty impressive.
Roach tells it the way it is.:deal Being "exposed" doesnt mean that you are a bad fighter for **** sakes.....it just means that certain flaws a fighter has have been revealed and uncovered. Exposed or uncovered,its just an assessement made by a guy who has the right to speak his mind. :hey:hi:
I have no problem with Roach giving his opinion, but if he thinks Macklin exposed martinez I would like to know what he thinks about marquez in the Pac fight and whether he exposed all of pac's so called improvements he been working on for all those years.
now your little hero ***** has a reason to not fight him...but if he ever mans up and tries he wont be a 6-1 under dog like cotto