Roach starts homework: KO in nine

Agreed, for me it's a coin flip. And to the guys who have taken up 90% of this thread.

You've argued good reasons and bad reasons for both Pac and Hatton.
Quit the childish playground ****.

Like a bunch of 10yr olds at points. :-(

 

You've been saying this for a long time. It has never happened.
It seems you, guys, are the one eating crows.

 

and you know more....atsch

 

^
pac already won in 147. that tell me that he beat a shot odlh. face the fact hatton is not yet HOF. Take a look at pac and check how many future HOF he has in his resume. Then your telling it will not be ricky's best win. And it will be pac's best win. get off the weed bro or the nuts should i say.:yep

 

Hatton fans are still having "POST" traumatic stress disorder.

 

You obviously can't read what I wrote :hi:

 

I think that if you bother to check back on my posts I have never said it...long time, or not :good

 

You've got it, well done :good

 

If you check back to my first post on this thread and read the first sentence or two, you idiots have just proved my point :deal

 

Hatton T/KO Round Ten.

 

Hatton vs Pac is a 50/50. And for someone to say that rooting for Pac is irrational and not fact-based is infact irrational himself. Its ridiculous especially when you say picking Pac to win is only speculation. Well no **** Sherlock, picking Hatton himself is ALSO just SPECULATION. So how the hell can a fact-based argument exist in a fight that has YET to happen? Someone needs to get his facts straight.

Both sides have offered good points for both guys winning. Using someone's record as a reason for winning because he has a better record in a particular weight is not always the right reason nor is it a fact-based. Especially if that fighter is fighting a weight-jumping freak who has proved himself in several weights already. If you people are picking Hatton to win, that is perfectly fine as he certainly has a big chance of winning this. But atleast give Pacquiao the benefit of the doubt for what he has accomplished throughout his career. That goes the same for those people picking Pac. Atleast give Ricky the benefit of the doubt as well.

I honestly can't see either fighter winning this fight EASILY. That's ridiculous for me seriously and totally unfounded.

 

I will happilly concede your point if you can make a rational argument for Pac beating the linear and ring champ at 140, given that he has never fought at the weight. Let me guess what your argument will be, speed, southpaw, Diaz, Oscar :-(

 

thumbsup

 

Good post, the more I try to analyze this fight, the more I realize its a pick em.

 

http://www.mb.com.ph/SPRT20090126146558.html