Roach wants to silence Pacquiao’s critics

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Critic, Jun 28, 2009.


  1. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
  2. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Cotto is clearly not the same fighter after the Margo fight..
     
  3. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    In other words NO CREDIT if PAC wins?!
     
  4. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    :lol: & The weight? (Catchweight)

    Itiswhatitis, & they will talk.
     
  5. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Roach is being a bit of a hypocrite here.

    Wasn't he the one claiming that Oscar could "not pull the trigger anymore" and then admitted later that DLH was weightdrained.
     
  6. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,291
    15,126
    Dec 6, 2008
    FINITO rates JMM's win over Barrera highly. An already "shot" Barrera when he fought Pac and then Morales again, was again, prime and at his best when he fought JMM. :lol:
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    same as some of you guys saying oscar would kill pac before the fight and saying all kind of excuses after.
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    since when did pac get full credit?
     
  9. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    ^^ Pac got full credit for the first Barrera fight.
     
  10. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Not even close to the same thing, Roach was already saying DLH was old and could not pull the trigger

    True most people (myself included) didn't think Pac would be able to handle the jump to 147 and we were wrong, Props to Pac for that.
    But in hindsight (with all the evidence available) you'd have to be blind not to agree that DLH was not even in the fight....

    Please don't tell me you disagree with this!:lol:
     
  11. vorapsak2002

    vorapsak2002 Active Member Full Member

    1,196
    1
    Apr 14, 2009

    as usual....
     
  12. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    It's not the critic's fault that Pacman has been fighting a handful of over the hill Mexicans. And those two fights against MArquez dont help either.. Both were borderline gifts.

    Hatton fight was good..

    Let's see him fight a live fighter in its prime who can actually box and punch back.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i even bet for oscar but i had to give credit to pac for pulling the odds. it's not the only factor why oscar loss, its just that we are surprised on how pac handled moving up from light to welter. we all know that oscar was past his prime but that doesn't stop most of us in believing that he would beat pac. about being weight drained, with that kind of improvement pac has showed, it doesn't matter what weight oscar was on that night. it would just make the fight a little longer and he could possibly last until the decision.
     
  14. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    So we both picked DLH to win, both agree that DLH was weight-drained and past his prime but still give credit to Pac and feel he looked good at 147.

    But I'm called a Pac-hater for it:lol:
     
  15. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Dude, Roach have said Oscar can't pull the trigger anymore and even said Oscar will be weight drain before the weigh in happen. So in that sense Roach is saying Oscar is going to be a shot weight drain fighter.