Roach wants tougher low blow rule for Pacquiao-Cotto

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stovepipe, Oct 12, 2009.


  1. Dynamite Kid

    Dynamite Kid "I Must Break You" Full Member

    4,408
    2
    Jan 31, 2008
    How the hell did that look "Vince McMahish"? Manny was the fighter coming up in weight to fight a guy that fought as high as 160 that they thought was gonna be very strong. Roach felt the type of way Oscar wraps by rolling up the tape between the knuckles creating a tiny piece of rope which he felt could have cut Manny. THAT'S NOT "PRO WRESTLING DRAMA". Was Hopkins and Nazim Richardson acting "Vince McMahish" when they exposed Tito's hand wraps? No they were not.
     
  2. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    A trainer is there to protect his fighter!!!!

    If he perceives that the handwraps were illegal, then rightfully so he should raise a voice. Infact, it is his responsibility to make sure that the opponent wraps his hands properly by default and should do it well. Handwraps can make or break a fight because illegally wrapped hands can cause cutsor much worse injuries.

    What pisses me off are trainers who actually do not do anything for their fighter. If Roach was the trainer of JMM in the fight against Mayweather, I am sure that that fight should have been a proper catchweight and surely, he wopuld have forced Mayweather to shed the 2 pounds he came in above the weight stipulated. Mayweather already had all the advantages in that fight, and allowing him to weigh-in above the stipulated weight is actually a
    This content is protected
    of the trainer.

    When the fight was rescheduled, Beritain should have objected since probably one o the reasons why Mayweather did so was weight issues. If he was not able to weigh in at 144 despite postponement of the fight, then surely there is something fishy going on - Mayweather was nowehere 144 during the first date of the fight.

    Would the outcome be any different???? Probably not but who knows!!!
     
  3. kartog

    kartog Agent Smith Full Member

    3,975
    84
    Sep 8, 2006
    I don't know if it's such a bad thing boxing having some pro wrestling drama :!:
     
  4. ps9teacher

    ps9teacher Member Full Member

    461
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    Wow! Judah was 2 years ago. He was in trouble against Margarito did YOU see anything illegal? He was in trouble against Clottey after the headbutt, which Clottey does more often than not, and he fights him the full 12 but yet people feel he cheats because CLottey was trying to jump ON COTTO like a horse?? Of course he's going to slam that clown. You're in there to fight not wrestle.

    Roach on the other hand doesn't want Cotto to come blazin' pac's body bc he knows it will be short night for the Philipino. People might want to criticize Cotto all they want but when it comes to a WHO's who of FIGHTGERS on their resume Cotto is 2nd to none. ok maybe to Mosley but that's it.
     
  5. Dynamite Kid

    Dynamite Kid "I Must Break You" Full Member

    4,408
    2
    Jan 31, 2008
    Clottey didn't jump on Cotto like a "horse". And You can't rank Cotto's resume higher than Pac's because they're about even with an edge to Manny. Manny has beaten world champions and has taken titles which Cotto has not. But to not be biased Cotto holds a victory over Shane Mosley who's ranked #1 at welterweight right now. Cotto has a very good resume, but not to the degree of "who's who" yet. Just to name a few fighters, Oscar Delahoya, Felix Trinidad, & Bernard Hopkins have a "whos who" resume of fighters they fought. Not Miguel Cotto. He's not in that category yet.
     
  6. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    You say "tomato", I say "potato"

    You say "low blow" ,I say "puerto rican uppercut"
     
  7. Dynamite Kid

    Dynamite Kid "I Must Break You" Full Member

    4,408
    2
    Jan 31, 2008
    I quote Larry Merchant on Pacquiao

    "Death by a thousand left hands":hey
     
  8. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,639
    17,170
    Mar 5, 2006
    former middleweight champ to be exact. I'm buying it.
     
  9. stormy

    stormy Live and Learn Full Member

    3,912
    133
    Mar 17, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:thumbsup:thumbsup
     
  10. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    78
    Feb 1, 2007
    I just watched it and I don't see what you see
     
  11. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    78
    Feb 1, 2007
    what is his name
     
  12. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,881
    78
    Feb 1, 2007
    So you would rather watch a good fighter resort to retaliatory tactics and watch a foul filled fight instead of having the frequently fouling fighter be forced to focus and fight fairly :lol:
     
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,111
    Jul 24, 2004
    Do you know his actual name Doby????

    With a poster with almost 10,000 posts and only been here a little over a year, I'd say its a former middleweight champ with alot of time on his hands......

    My guess would be that he's rotting in jail about now......could it be Michael Nunn????

    Am I right???



    Actually I though Michael Nunn was a phemonenal talent who threw away his career to alcohol and drug use.

    Nallege is a Floyd lover, so I'd say there's a good chance if he's really a former Middleweight champ, that its Michael Nunn.


    Did I hit it?

    If I did'nt, how far am I?
     
  14. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    :roll: Calm down there Jennifer.....this isn't anything new in this sport if you've followed it for very long. Catch weights, smaller men taking on bigger ones, complaints about dirty tatics before the fight...it's boxing and part of the game. And they will fight and all the talking will be done in the ring but if everyone shut up there would be no hype to build the fight.:yep
     
  15. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    It'll be a fair fight and the best man will win. No excuses just a good fight between two warriors. Cotto is known for low blows when he's in trouble or at a disadvantage and Roach is putting it out there so if that does occur like it has in previous Cotto fights that it will not be tolerated. An auto DQ is crazy but I think that was more "hype" than anything else. Beltline shots are fine and the ref will know the difference but a low blow is a low blow and that would not be legal in any commission/sactioned fight.