robbed

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by beat down, Aug 12, 2012.


  1. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
  2. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,948
    0
    May 10, 2011
    troll
     
  3. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    No. If you win the fight but don't get it..in that fighters eyes he's been robbed. If he didn't get a decision that he rightfully should have got then its a ****ing robbery. Why does it have to be wide before it s considered a robbery? It you should have won but didn't get it uv been robbed whether it was close or not. Most close decisions go to the hometown fighter or the marquee name OR there is some other form of corruption involved...so if that's the basis on which a fight is decided then somebody has been ****ing robbed.

    To say you can't have a competitive 'close' fight but never have a definate winner is ****** logic.
    I don't give a **** what anyone wants to say... If you should have got a decision but didn't then regardless of how 'close' it is, you've been ****ing cheated out of it.
     
  4. micky

    micky Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,957
    15
    Feb 19, 2005
    Can't be anything other than a close fight, either man could of won the fight, someone had to, therefore whatever decision they came up with as long as they had it close was fine by me.

    Good luck to the kid, 43 fights and an Olympic Gold Medal, I have no problems with that at all.

    Well done.
     
  5. Hands of Paper

    Hands of Paper Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    Again[ffs], A robbery happens when one fighter clearly wins the fight and isn't awarded the decision.

    Either Joshua or the Italian could have been awarded that fight. I personally thought the Italian just about nicked it. However, neither fighter could have been robbed had the other taken it. It was that close.
     
  6. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
  7. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011
    Audley Harrison beats this Joshua kid.
     
  8. troy

    troy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,291
    37
    Aug 7, 2010
    way overrated looks a little chinny as well
     
  9. simmo

    simmo Active Member Full Member

    849
    1
    Feb 18, 2012
    In fairness there's no way he lost the second by 3. Overall I did think the Italian shaded it but some parts of it were quite wild (and low quality) and it could easily have gone either way.
     
  10. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    Again, No. You are a ****in ****** who can't be educated
     
  11. Hands of Paper

    Hands of Paper Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    GTFO moron.
     
  12. littleguy

    littleguy Member Full Member

    226
    0
    Sep 29, 2007
    I liked it better under the old corrupt 3 judge "i'll vote for my guy you vote for your guy and we'll let the impartial but completely clueless bothtswanan or icelandic judge decide" system. This button pushing crapola olympic nonsense makes me want to hurl. Joshua got his ass beat by Cammarelle in any normal universe where the result of a bout isn't determined by punch counters and button pushers. And Joshua better learn to move his head if he wants to make it as a pro.
     
  13. bratwurzt

    bratwurzt Whore Full Member

    3,816
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    How did the count back work then please? I don't understand, Joshua was two rounds down at the start of the 3rd.
     
  14. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    The **** are you on about?:lol:

    Edit: Actually don't bother replying. You're ****ing ******ed.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,654
    83,494
    Nov 30, 2006
    Cammarelle deserved the gold.