Robbery

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TK Terrible, Apr 12, 2008.


  1. Johnnyblaze

    Johnnyblaze Active Member Full Member

    1,052
    6
    Mar 1, 2006
  2. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    Dawson lost, plain and simple.
     
  3. deal

    deal Member Full Member

    144
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    surely it would be less suspicious to have some variation ?
     
  4. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Not a robbery, but I had it 115-113 Johnson.
     
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Scored it by 2 for Johnson, or, if I was going to be unkind, just by 1. Happy with a draw; very much so. Dawson would have kept his belt too.

    But 116-112...:-(
     
  6. Smith

    Smith Monzon-like Full Member

    5,953
    2
    Mar 8, 2007
    I was ****ing hammered when I wrote this on my brothers profile.
     
  7. Eubank

    Eubank Active Member Full Member

    1,264
    1
    Mar 22, 2008
    The judges had to pick between a man who wanted to fight and another who ran away.
     
  8. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :-( :-( :-( :-(
     
  9. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Well...Hopkins v. Winky was scored 117-111 for Hopkins', harder more effective punches...and many people said: quite right (not me). In that case, how could Johnson v. Dawson be scored 116-112 for Dawson, according to the same standards?:huh
     
  10. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    how is this comparable to recent claims of robbery as jmm-pac 2?
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,336
    11,378
    Jan 6, 2007
    Robbery might be too strong of a word, but definitely a bad decision.