"Roberto Duran-Hector Camacho" of 1996. Was the bogus dec. in the bag for Camacho??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, Sep 19, 2011.


  1. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Folks,

    I still get pissed every time I review my 1996 tape of "Duran-Camacho" on PPV...... Duran did start slowly, but by round 3 he was heating up, while the younger Camacho looked to be dragging along, yet very game... Camacho for a vato only age 34 was NOT very impressive weighing the full 160 pounds, meanwhile, Duran at 157 pounds was very spry, aggressive and accurate with his shots after his motor warmed-up... WTF were the crooked judges thinking??? I know, it was future money to be made with a fresh fight, instead of making a fight like "Duran-Leonard 4." A fight like "Leonard-Camacho 1" was what the fans wanted to see in 1997, thus, the judges robbed Duran and gave Camacho a nice gift.... Total Bull****......
    :deal
    C'mon back with some feedback...:hey

    MR.BILL:bbb:hat
     
  2. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,129
    1,427
    Jan 1, 2011
    I thought it was pretty close and could've gone either way. I gave the edge to Roberto, though not sure how unbiased I was at the time, but Camacho won a lot of rounds. I don't think it was a robbery.
     
  3. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I thought Pooran edged it first time I saw.
     
  4. Arminius

    Arminius Member Full Member

    482
    17
    Sep 5, 2006
    I think the judges thought that Camacho was more marketable than an old Duran so they judged by what they thought was best for the future. I can think of a number of t judges who have judged wrongly that way. Holmes-Witherspoon, Spinks-Holmes II, Nelson-Fenech I amd Toney-Tiberi come to mind.
     
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    This **** happens sometimes to a once great who dosen't know when to hang 'em up. No one knows when to pack it in..and as in Duran's case, and all of them really, they end up prostituting their legacies against guys who they would have beaten in years past. And I'm sure the pathetic excuse for Duran was that he spent away all his earnings and he didn't know any other way to make a living.
     
  6. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Can imagine how awful it would have been for Leonard to be outlasted and beaten by an ancient Roberto Duran in a 4th fight.
     
  7. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    I do think the judges were swayed by presenting a 1997 comeback fight for SRL to meet Camacho on PPV.... That notion was better than Ray and Roberto doing a 4th fight that no doubt would've stunk like a rancid fart in a locker-room.... Still, all in all, I that Duran edged Camacho fair and square in 1996...... now, later in 2001, no, Duran at age 50 was just too slow, but was still ruff and tuff enough to trouble the still spry 39 year old Camacho....

    MR.BILL
     
  8. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    That decision made me holler. I went out and attacked a Puerto Rican and the first three middle-aged white guys in suits I saw. Duran won that damn fight and it was a helluva damn win, too.
     
  9. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    I'll buy that......:hey

    MR.BILL:hat
     
  10. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    ...now stop bringing it up already!