Roberto Duran. Overrated or what?!

Never that!

 

Duran had a good chin that is for sure. But his record of doing great with lesser lightweight competition and then moving up and fighting better guys when he was bigger, gives him an excuse with the best guys he fought. He still lost to the best guys he ever fought. That is significant.

 

Nobody knows how good Duran's early comp was because the names are not recognizable. It is why i don't put much stock into names, but the time you fought a guy. Name fighters count, but the stage of that fighter has to be determined. Duran is not even close to overrated, yet he is not greater than Leonard. Duran was brave enough to take on the best past his prime, and he did well win or lose.

 

hell no.

 

I really do believe that you are 2 thick 2 know you are THICK, you have not one ounce of boxing knowlage or any credible opinion based on living, watching or understanding the boxing scene as it was in the 70's/80's. Your original poste has 2 go down as one if not the most ignorant ever with regards to boxing ,

You are just another boxing dinner/show groupie, someone that just reads stats & memorises a few top names, a band wagon boy in effect. Your post borders on the criminal, you have more in common with Steve Bunce i.e bluffer, i suggest you return too ice skating or show jumping where your new found knowlage of boxing would fit well, you are a WANKER.

 

I believe the right word for this man would be a troll.

 

a hell of a good one to be fair. most of this board despises him now

 

:rofl:rofl

I think this about sums it up:hi:

 

Well done,i thought i'd throw that little spelling test in just to see if you had any attribute's and at least you've passed that.Well done Junior:good
Now,as for your boxing "knowledge".....

 

He was much GREATER that Leonard:good

 

What a rash generalization.

 

Nobody likes you anymore.

 

Ok, I'll say few then.