Roberto Duran vs. Alexis Arguello 135

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Grillinnap, Apr 13, 2010.


  1. Grillinnap

    Grillinnap Flomos are morons Full Member

    6,312
    0
    Dec 1, 2009
  2. Terror

    Terror free smoke Full Member

    3,136
    1,500
    Mar 22, 2010
  3. Tricks77

    Tricks77 Sergio By God Martinez Full Member

    1,222
    5
    Nov 8, 2007
    To begin with, I wouldn't classify either of these two as lightweights - Arguello was best as a Super Featherweight and Duran had most of his high-profile fights at Junior Welterweight and beyond. That having been said, Duran was only stopped once, legitimately, in his prime, by Tommy Hearns, who was much larger than Arguello at any time in his career. I don't see Arguello outpointing Duran, who was an inexorable force and brutal puncher, and I don't see Arguello stopping him, as Duran had a famed chin of iron of epic proportions.

    I see Duran hammering the slender body of Arguello into submission before putting him away in the 12th through 15th rounds with bludgeoning hooks and uppercuts. The fights with Davey Moore or Iran Barkley are classic examples of how Duran would conquer Arguello.
     
  4. Dizzle

    Dizzle Active Member Full Member

    958
    0
    Sep 20, 2009
    Tricks. Duran is definitely a lightweight & did he ever fight at light-welter? I agree that Arguello is more of a super feather though. IMO Duran is the greatest lightweight of all time.

    I see this being quite brutal but think that Duran would get the decision.
     
  5. southpaw jab

    southpaw jab Guest

    How can you not consider Duran a lightweight? He is considered the greatest lightweight ever by many, myself NOT being one of them. Anyways, Duran would have knocked Arguello unconcious, let's be realistic.
     
  6. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Arguello is great, but I don't see that he could withstand the swarming onslaught of Duran. The guy is too slick and would take away his best weapons from the outside, and move the fight up close where Arguello is uncomfortable for a wide decision or late stoppage Pryor-style.

    All these Duran vs. X threads keep popping up, and Duran gets favoured heavily over X every time. It should be noted that that isn't an insult to X - X is generally a genuine ATG. Duran at 135 was just that good.
     
  7. southpaw jab

    southpaw jab Guest

    I think Pernell Whitaker boxes circles around Duran @ 135 but, thats just me.
     
  8. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    The answer to the question lies in answering yet another question. Did Ray Mancinni do anything, anything at all, better than a peak 135 pound Duran?
     
  9. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    I'd favour Whitaker over him, but I don't think anyone's "boxing circles" around a prime Duran. Let's not get carried away.
     
  10. Tricks77

    Tricks77 Sergio By God Martinez Full Member

    1,222
    5
    Nov 8, 2007
    I didn't say I didn't consider him a Lightweight, just that I wouldn't "classify" him as one. He only fought about a dozen fights at Lightweight where both competitors were actually between 130 and 135, and really the only "name" opponents he fought during that time were Ken Buchanan, Ray Lampkin and Esteban De Jesus. When I think of Duran, I think of him really establishing himself as an all-time-great above 135. Not to say that his resume at 130-135 isn't good, he was undefeated, obviously, but I remember him most for his fights above that weight limit.
     
  11. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Who would you rank as being just about an ATG?