Roberto Duran was rated 3rd in a list in `96 of the Top 50 fighters in 50 years

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mark Adam, Jul 20, 2018.


  1. Mark Adam

    Mark Adam Active Member banned Full Member

    837
    254
    Jul 4, 2018
    Duran was rated by writers for The Ring magazine in June `96 3rd in a list of the Top 50 fighters in the last 50 years at that time, here`s info the added about Duran:
    Record: 96-11 (67)
    World Titles: Lightweight*, Welterweight, Junior Middleweight, Middleweight
    Quality of opposition: 10
    Bout against Top 50 fighters:4
    Why he`s here: A mixture of ferocity, talent accomplishment and longevity?
    What he could have done to improve his ranking: Taken his lumps like a man vs Ray Leonard in their second fight. What does anyone on this forum think? Should Duran be placed higher or lower?
     
  2. DJN16

    DJN16 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,738
    2,803
    Sep 15, 2013
    I think Duran at his absolute best is arguably top 5 p4p of all time.
     
    Reinhardt and Mark Adam like this.
  3. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,700
    Jun 7, 2016
    Sounds about right.

    I disagree about the Leonard part though.
    Yeah he shouldn't have quit BUT...


    ...I think he quit because he was embarrassed not because he was taking a beating.
    That's not how it happened it was still somewhat competitive and Duran wasn't taking much punishment and he took alot of big shots later in his career that he didnt quit from.
    Leonard was just making a fool out of him and Duran knew he was gonna lose because he just didn't have it in him that night to chase him down, keep him against the ropes and butcher him like he did with several runners at LW.

    He knew Leonard was in shape, was sharp and he knew from the first fight that Ray was a real WW who wouldn't be as easy to slow down to the body and then maul as a lightweight.


    He just didn't "fancy the job" in his mind that night
     
    Secretariat and Mark Adam like this.
  4. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    lower. He never knocked out an all time great fighter.. The best fighter he ever knocked out was a shopworn Pipino Cuevas in 1983.. All the other greats beat him. Apparently he had a ceiling, which his fans say was the weight not a skill ceiling. I see it a little differently. I don't think he was completely as effective at 154 as 135, but I don't think it is as big a factor as his fans say.. To be top 10 ATG he had to have beaten the greats he did not beat.
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,341
    9,958
    Jun 23, 2008
    I have Robinson and Ali ranked #1 and #2 all time.

    At the third stop, I always flip flop Duran and and Leonard.
     
  6. DJN16

    DJN16 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,738
    2,803
    Sep 15, 2013
    Yeah without question Robinson is number one.

    I have no qualms with Ali being at #2 but can see why others have him lower.

    Duran’s legendary career which was cast with highs and lows has to be studied in
    depth.

    When in proper training and shape Duran was undoubtedly one of the best ever.
     
  7. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,777
    1,732
    Nov 23, 2014
    How on earth could Ali be number 2? How does his resume justify a top 10 ranking.
     
  8. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,037
    914
    Sep 11, 2017
    Duran is 5th since 1946, for me:
    1. Robinson
    2. Ali
    3. Pep
    4. Charles
    5. Duran
    Langford, Greb, and Armstrong would be in my ATG top five, but are too early (Fitzsimmons and Gans would also feature above Pep, Charles and Duran to make up my top ten).