Robinson Was Dropped 10 Times In His Career!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by southpaw1974, Apr 30, 2008.


  1. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    :roll:

    Im telling you Fraud didnt dominate him cause it was 8-4 or 7-5 and Zab deserved a point for the KD.

    Now youre saying it coulda been scored 11 - 1. :nut Jesus. :-(
     
  2. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Your co-worker is foolish to believe that logic. Does he/she not understand the concept of weight and power?
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    One judge did score it 11-1. Round 2 was the only round that you had to give to Zab, maybe round 4 as well. Name one other round besides 2 and 4 that Zab clearly won.
     
  4. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    It was a joke :deal :patsch
     
  5. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    3,634
    4
    Mar 30, 2008
    For ****s sakes this guy has lost his mind.

    Mayweather has more than a 50% chance of beating prime Hagler?

    Hagler can't fight going backwards?

    He's not much bigger than Floyd?

    :patsch
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,857
    17,081
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's an easy trap to fall into if you haven't seen a certain fighter more than once or twice. I admit, I fall victim to this on occassion, in particular, in instances where my limited exposure either verifies or dismisses popular claims.

    But it is strange that Hagler, in particular, is one of those fighters that so many undermine in terms of skill. He was an outstanding boxer. You're probably wasting your time attempting to educate some people in this thread who obviously have limited reference.

    That anyone would take Mayweather over Hagler at middleweight is well beyond the realm of reason.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,857
    17,081
    Jul 19, 2004
    7-5?!?!?!

    Share whatever the **** you were smoking when you watched that one.

    I believe I had it 9-3 for Floyd, but regardless, Mayweather totally dominated after making a few adjustments in the 3rd round. He kept setting the same traps over and over, and Judah, dumb **** that he was, kept trying to do the same things that worked earlier without making any counter adjustments.
     
  8. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    3,634
    4
    Mar 30, 2008
    No.

     
  9. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    was that the same judge that scored Casamayor over Santa Cruz by a wide margin?:lol:

    Judges never get it wrong, huh Reg?:think


    I had it 8-4 and a KD, Fraud clearly won but calling it dominate is a stretch.

    Pac dominated MAB
    DLH dominated Mayorga
    Cal dominated Lacy

    theres a real difference.
     
  10. SgrRyLeonard

    SgrRyLeonard Active Member Full Member

    823
    199
    Jun 4, 2006
    Personally, I think Robinson, Hearns, Leonard are all better fighters as of right now than Miguel Cotto, (Cotto's career is not yet over so that could change somewhat depending on what happens from here on out) yet Floyd isn't exactly in a hurry to face Cotto. How can he be better than the other greats if he's reluctant to face someone who is not yet on their level? If A is better than B but C won't face B how can C be better than A? I don't get it. When he fights Cotto, then's the time to talk about how he's up there with Robinson, Leonard, Duran, Benitez. Armstrong. Floyd is an ATG but he's not yet at THAT level.
     
  11. southpaw1974

    southpaw1974 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,710
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
    It was either 9-3 or 8-4 Mayweather. Judah got off to a good start and won 3 of the first 4 and then won no more than one round after that. Again, getting off to a good start doesn't mean ****. If you win the first set against Federer and end up losing the last few sets it doesn't matter how you started. A loss is a loss, and only in boxing do people care about how you started.
     
  12. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    fair enough, my point on the subject is that Fraud did not "dominate" Zab.

    Cal dominated Lacy
    Pac dominated MAB
    Holyfield dominated Tyson
    Shane dominated Collazo

    theres a difference.
     
  13. southpaw1974

    southpaw1974 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,710
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
    I never said that height and reach were everything, I simply stated that they were factors to consider when evaluating size. To state that they are not factors is moronic. Of course Tyson's freakish power and speed were equalizers in regards to size, but he still deserved credit for dominating guys who had 6 inches in height and 10 inches in reach on him. By the way, Hagler was far from a big middleweight. Hopkins was a much bigger middleweight and proved it my being very successful two divisons above it. Do you really think Hagler would have been able to defeat Spinks at 175?
     
  14. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    :huh
     
  15. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    He actually said all that, and that Floyd is a better boxer than Hearns?

    And I was actually trying to educate this ignorant little **** earlier. That is beyond stupidity. A natural 130 pounder who has enough trouble with shot 154 pounders is going to beat an ATG 160 pounder? :rofl