Rocky Marciano vDeontay Wilder?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jan 1, 2016.


  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    :lol::lol:
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    When you consider :

    Marciano height 5' 10.5" weight 185lbs reach 68"
    Wilder Height 6'7" weight 228lbs reach 83"
    Speed Wilder . Power = Equal?
    Is it so outlandish to give Wilder a chance here?
     
  3. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    Threads like these are perplexing. If people put Wilder up against Louis or Dempsey people would be laughing at the implication of Wilder having a shot.

    Really makes you wonder how Marciano was able to accomplish what the did when his H2H ability is rated so low, and based on film, rightfully so.
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Nobody backs Carnera versus Marciano. Why wilder?
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Boxing is not ice skating.

    A punch to the jaw tastes the same as it always did.

    I seem to remember that research proved the Spartan warriors of ancient times came out on top against a ninjas and such like on the "deadliest Warrior" tv show.

    Combat sports are not comparable to advances in pastimes or Olympic events.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    He isn't impying it is, he is just wondering if other sports have the same foibles as ours.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    You seem to have a problem with this match up.:huh

    On another tack, I'd pick Wilder to ko Carnera.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    There's no law against you voting for Rocky.:huh
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,366
    21,814
    Sep 15, 2009
    If you were answering a question about a fight between Hagler and Spinks, would you assume Hagler weighed 160?
     
  10. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009
    no I would not, however, I wouldn't assume Hagler would be the same force he was at MW as he would be at LHW.

    For what it is worth I would take Spinks over Hagler head to head even if Hagler came in at 175.

    It is not easy going up in weight if it was all past champions would of been doing it when reality shows us that only the very best champs did it and many a time they got beat.
     
  11. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Wilder only weighs 215 pounds.
     
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010

    Exactly.

    Also, boxing is natural, and very simple. It's been around forever. It can't evolve as a sport, the same way football does.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,366
    21,814
    Sep 15, 2009
    Like darts, a dart thrower from yesteryear wouldn't necessarily be worse than a dart thrower from today because all they're doing is throwing a dart and how much can that really evolve?

    Like throwing a punch, it can't change that much. Technique and defensive prowess can be improved which is why those who innovated those styles still seem elite now on film, but punch style, power and resistance cannot improve the way some think.

    Ketchel might well get outboxed by someone like Sumbu Kalambay but how many MW people would you favour to out brawl him? To match him punch for punch and come out on top?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    Wilder hasn't weighed 215 for the last 4 years.
    But I am confused ,at what point does one become a "superheavyweight"?:huh
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I would say a heavyweight stops being a true heavyweight at 235lb. I like the example of a fighter being so big he could never realistically make 225, and even now that's not too many when you check the lowest some SHW have scaled.

    A true superheavyweight is 6'5" in my view. This kind of height, modern training won't allow less than 225 anymore. Anything shorter is a manufactured SHW but since 235lb seems to be about the weight that a boxer seems to function like a big man with his skills and pace compromised for using weight in itself as an advantage I would include them too.

    Holding a man down in order to rest is another point where Superheavyweight starts.