Rocky Marciano vs Evander Holyfield

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by baconmaker, Mar 15, 2015.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,089
    Mar 21, 2007
    Without building himself up, Holyfield was 2-3 inches taller, had a five inch reach advantage.

    At 22 he weighed 177lbs. At 22 Ezzard Charles was 165lbs.

    At 25, which is when a fighter is genuinely "mature" (although he will often want another weight class at some point in his thirties) Holyfield weighed 188lbs. At 25 Charles weighed 173lbs.

    There is absolutely a clear weight class between them. It is not true that they were the same size. By every reasonable way of measuring them, Holyfield is bigger.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I think Holyfield has the style to beat Marciano, but it only takes one punch to ruin that scenario.
    A great fight, for sure.
     
  3. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    Flying Frenchman and yourself have it right. There really isn't room for argument with regards to their size. Frenchman's comments on Charles' quality circa 1954 also mirror my own.
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I don't think there is any real evidence Holyfeild was anything more than Charles height wise. The only thing we can say with real conviction is Evander was less than 6'3" and over 5'11". They were both genuine six footers but not a Larry Holmes or Ali species of tall.
    I cannot dispute this since this is recorded. Charles was 169lb at the same age so we are talking 8lb. What is 8lb between six footers?


    that's not a big difference though is it? Holyfeild was 177 at 22,23 years old.


    But it is negligible really isn't it? It's like the difference between Ali and Ken Norton. Or Louis and Schmeling.
    It's not a clear weight class really is it? 176-188. In Charles' day this was still heavyweight. Both guys would be regarded around the same size.
     
  5. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    :huh I love Holyfield? I'm just being realistic about him?

    And I don't think Holy took Rid**** lightly whatsoever - to the contrary I think he new that this was the biggest test he had had to that point - and he came in at 205 his lightest as champion - which suggests he trained his ***** off? You're right about Bowe taking him lightly in the rematch and look what happened Bowe was much worse and Evander capitalised - that was my point - Bowe comes in the same shape with the same determination as the first fight and Holy doesn't win - same with Marciano he would be facing a genuine threat some one in possibly even better shape than him and in prime and we're talking best form etc etc - if he don't beat Bowe in top shape prime and form he don't beat one of the top 10 heavies of all time
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,127
    25,303
    Jan 3, 2007
    I don't see a prime Evander losing to too many people who are giving up size against him. He has the right style and physical attributes to neutralize an inside attacker.. Tyson tried to bully his way into Holyfield and Evander tied him up and threw him off balance every time. That was a past prime Holyfield dealing with a bigger and stronger version of Marciano. Throughout his career Holyfield battled life and death with men who exceeded him in lbs and inches and in some cases even youth. And I can't imagine him being stopped when at the peak of his game.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,089
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here is the Charles-Walcott tale of the tape:
    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/File:F23156TT.JPG

    A second one, giving identical measurements:
    http://crookersnhem69.tumblr.com/post/102075332884/boxingsgreatest-throwback-tale-of-the-tape

    Here is The Baltimore Sun listing Holyfield's tale of the tape at 6/2 and a half:
    http://articles.baltimoresun.com/19...7_1_evander-holyfield-george-foreman-column-1

    Boxrec which lists him at 6.2 1/2:
    http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=499&cat=boxer

    For his first cruiserweight title bout he was listed at 6'1. The fighter himself says "I'm 6'2. RealHeights lists him at 6'1 1/2.


    Saying there is "no evidence" that Holyfield is taller is ludicrous, frankly.


    A weight class.

    A light-heavyweight against a super-middleweight.

    Saying they are the same size is inaccurate. In 1943, the year he turned 22, Charles has two listed weights on Boxrec: 165 & 168.

    In 1984, the year he turned 22, Holyfield has one listed weight: 177lbs.

    Significant difference, evidence that they were not "the same size".


    It's fifteen pounds. It is indeed a big difference.

    It's further evidence that there is a difference in size between them.



    It's very obvious to everyone but you that Holyfield is physically bigger than Charles. I don't know why this matters so much to you (though I bet I could guess...) but what you are saying on the forum on this subject is inaccurate.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I shall concede that the majority feels Holyfeild was only marginally bigger then. I stand corrected, from this day forward I shall refer to Evander as being only marginally bigger than Charles before he built himself up rather than the same size.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,089
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think the simplest and best way to refer to him is as a weight class bigger. Now, if you want to describe him as "marginally bigger" I won't argue with you but i still feel personally it is not correct.

    There is a size difference of some significance, and were the two to fight at, I would guess, any time they shared an age, commentators would refer to Holyfield as "the bigger man."
     
  10. Warkaman

    Warkaman New Member Full Member

    46
    1
    Feb 23, 2015
    Holyfield only ever beat one undefeated fighter Alex Stewart. Rocky grinds him down and it is stopped in the later rounds.
     
  11. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    I know E.H. was young and old but Quawi was 5"5 and gave him a good battle 1st time, James Toney 5"9 and stopped him with body shots, Czyz was 5'9 and held up pretty good, Bert Cooper and Sherman Williams were listed at 5"11 and these guys gave him more trouble than some of the Bigger men Evander fought ....even Chris Byrd listed at 6'1 beat him while most thought Evander beat Valuev
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,127
    25,303
    Jan 3, 2007
    The sentence highlighted in red is the crux of the whole issue.
     
  13. janwalshs

    janwalshs Active Member Full Member

    625
    214
    Feb 19, 2010
    Holyfield busts him up pretty good and stops him within 10 rounds.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Holyfield is too big, quick and skilled for Rocky, who'd be game but get lit up way too much.

    You mean like Marciano only ever beat old small men?
     
  15. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004

    The Bobby C fight was right before the Tyson fight and Evander did not look so great and BC was a legitimate middleweight/light heavyweight and Bert Cooper was a title defense