Rocky Marciano vs Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Jan 2, 2020.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,110
    25,266
    Jan 3, 2007
    That’s cool
     
  2. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    I thought we were talking about the Moore knockdown
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  3. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,643
    18,446
    Jun 25, 2014
    This might be a three-round fight, at most.

    Compared to Marciano, Frazier had great handspeed. And, in a phonebooth war, where punching power, defense and chins are pretty comparable, hand speed matters.

    Both guys did go down early against others. If Joe puts Rocky down first and early, like Walcott and Moore did, I think Joe finishes him in short order. Same with Marciano. If Rocky puts Joe down first, that might be it for Joe.

    Could be a case of whoever hurts the other guy first wins.

    Based on handspeed alone, I'd say Frazier hurts Rocky first.

    Frazier wouldn't stop punching. Rocky didn't fight a lot of guys who did that against him and he never fought any heavyweight sluggers as good or as fast or as busy as Joe Frazier.

    I'd lean toward Joe. But it's really a pick'em fight.
     
  4. The Malibu Mauler

    The Malibu Mauler Lakers in 5 Full Member

    361
    631
    Oct 2, 2018
    Frazier outworks Marciano and ultimately stops him with his hook
     
    JC40 and Charlietf like this.
  5. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,869
    Jul 12, 2008
    Very much my opinion mate.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  6. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,502
    Feb 25, 2020
    oh Frazier by tko or ud. He was bigger, 20 pounds heavier, faster, probably stronger too at least as strong for the type of body added the size difference, he was harder to hit clean, he had better body attack. Foreman could not keep Joe down so Marciano would not do it
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fifteen pounds heavier faster and more elusive I'd say. I lean towards Marciano because he had two handed power,but it's really a pick em fight imo.
     
  8. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,502
    Feb 25, 2020
    185 vs 205. 20 pounds is fair. Sometimes rocky. Weighed a little over 185 (and under 185)but also Frazier weighed at 209 in great shape against Foster.
     
    George Crowcroft and JC40 like this.
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sorry yes, you are right, an aberrration on my part.
     
    George Crowcroft, JC40 and Charlietf like this.
  10. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,258
    15,315
    Jun 9, 2007
    :beer-toast1:
     
    JC40 and George Crowcroft like this.
  11. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    There weren't any positive articles and adjectives used to describe Walcott also?
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    He was called," Old Man River ,"in the Ring.
    Walcott and Charles were perceived as average champions in their own time.Walcott was seen as inconsistent an in and outer,Charles as colourless.
     
  13. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    So I repeat, there wasn't any positive adjective used to describe either? Only the ones you and seamus have put forth?
     
    Brockton Rock likes this.
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    He was also described as a good father.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm sorry K, you've lost me here.