i said Originally Posted by combatesdeboxeo This content is protected larry holmes never did beat a prime legend. he fought wars against spoon, past prime norton,past prime shavers or weaver. berbick,snipes, and smith gave him a fight holmes dominated shavers in the cards but still he was almost ko. simply shavers was not a great finisher.
This is the same guy that said Holmes went "life and death" with Witherspoon... He also just said he really lost to Witherspoon... I'd say anyone who saw that fight would say Holmes won by a mile...
you are an complete ignorant , no doubt. you said this bull**** on other thread and of course the greta agreed with me then you did close your mouth.
We can argue forever about who Holmes fought and whether or not he dominated etc..But it's all irrelevant. Holmes at his best beats Marciano at his best. Too much height reach and speed...Not to mention one of the best jabs in HW history. Marciano's only chance is by ko and I don't see it happening. Holmes is no Layne or Cockell or Savold. He is a big tall mobile HW with excellent skills and a long reach with a potent jab attached to the end of it. Rocky would have that jab in his face all night. Something he wasn't really used to facing with regularity. Plus Larry wouldn't stand in front of him. He would be on the move and Marciano wouldn't catch him. Stylewise this fight is all wrong for Rocky. As good as Rocky was in his own era I just don't see a man under 6' with a 68 inch reach beating a prime Holmes no matter how tough. Marciano's not big enough and fast enough to get it done. Holmes by decision.
what pathetic :rofl. congratulations, i will put your words on the thread on nonsense and ignoramuses.
Incorrect. I can't keep up with all your babbling rants, not that I care to. I, unlike you, can accept when someone disagrees with what I think.
really ? i never did talk with you on this thread and you did not respect my opinion, funny because you exposed your ignorance a guy who said " holmes did beat spoon by a mile" never watched this fight for sure.
I guess I'm in the minority... I had Holmes winning virtually every round. Witherspoon did **** in that fight. He even had him hurt at some point midway, but didn't do **** with the opportunity... I had the scorecard around my computer desk, but I think my wife got to it. Just watched a couple of weeks ago.
Found it- 118-110 Holmes I gave the 7th and the 9th to Tim. The 9th is where he had Holmes hurt and did absolutely nothing... The official scorecards were: 118-111, 114-115, and 115-113. I guess I agreed with the first judge. I just don't see it. He got nothing done. Holmes controlled everything in that fight. He landed the harder, cleaner shots, threw more, landed more... It wasn't an ass-kicking either way, it was an uneventful fight. Holmes was simply much better. Just my opinion.
I think Marciano finishes the fight ,but I agree with the rest of this post. Holmes had ridiculous powers of recuperation. The shot Shavers nailed him with ,sent pins and needles right down to his foot, seconds later the guy is fighting back, he should have been dead.
"The Homer" of 1980 is too tall, skilled, quick, tuff and accurate to be beaten by 1953 Marciano... Marciano is game throughout, but out-boxed and sliced to ribbons by round 12....... Holmes TKO 13 Marciano........ MR.BILL