But they aren't SHW tactics, they're Wlad tactics. Fury doesn't jab and grab. Vitali didn't. In fact when Valuev fought Ruiz, Ruiz initiated the clinches up close, Valuev wanted the fight at the end of his jab.
I really feel that technique and tempo has less importance at Superheavyweight than any other division. Bulking up took over. They found ways of improving the taller heavyweights. Once this became the fashion a new type of champion emerged that could never have been successful before. It suited the biggest and sometimes oldest champions in a way it did not before. The more stylish champions came into being from having to overcome champions who fought that way. The championship competition molded the way the champions were. Each era of champion developed the kind if champion it took in order to be successful at that time. And that's what we have now. The kind of champion it takes to be successful at this time. If the generations coming through gave to contest within a division where technique and pace is neutralized with bulk then I fear that it will become a case of "if you can't beat them, join them".
A new type of fighter formed that wouldn't have been successful in the past? You don't think Lennox Lewis would have done well in the days of Jack Dempsey or Joe Louis? I reckon he would have cleaned the division out tbh.
Lewis knocked out most of his championship opponents. He would have "succeeded before" just fine. How could he not? Fighting smaller men more susceptible to his power. He's not going to score fewer knockouts because there are three rounds at the end of the 12 he didn't usually complete, is he? Wladimir boxed with incredible economy. He might be the best heavyweight at controlling pace in history, but "Temp has less importance" in this division according to you. Why was tempo the cornerstone of this eras greatest heavyweight then? Vitali Klitschko had an outstanding engine. Outstanding. Better than most smaller men. It's part of what made him a champion. He knocked out most of his top opposition, too, and even at 40, despite a high work-rate, he looked reasonably fresh in the fights that did go late. Why would a fighter with a great engine who knocked out most opposition struggle in an earlier era against 190lb fighters? Rid**** Bowe, in his prime, had a great engine. Superb. High work rate. 15 rounds wouldn't make any more difference to him than someone like Liston (who never completed that duration) or Louis I don't think. In his short prime. Honestly choklab, this is pure fantasy. These ideas of you are just Marciano fuelled nonsense. It's hard to express how little what you say makes sense in a post.
Ken Norton was quoted as saying he never lifted weights during his boxing career. I don't know about Lyle. Steroids? I am sure they have played a part in recent times, but there are lots of aids available to modern fighters that are perfectly legal. I refuse to believe that Vlad or Haye haven't had help that Dempsey or Frazier never did. I don't buy "pacing" as being responsible for Vlad's improvement in stamina;the guy fought like he had a collapsed lung, ffs!
Lewis is one of the most multi dimensional HW fighters in history. He would never struggle in any era. The worst thing that can be said is if he's cracked with a flush HW punch he'll get knocked out.
IMO, any fighter, including any iron-jawed HW, who gets cracked with a perfect flush shot from a hard-hitting heavyweight, that they didn't see coming, is going down for the count. Physics and Biology.
If Norton didn't lift weights how does he explain the big rise in weight throughout his career whilst being in great condition?
Norton was a big fan of the bodybuilding he was friend of lou ferigno, of course that he trained weights. Ron lyle never ever did, he said that in prison he had only 2 or 3 meals for day and he did 1000 push ups for day
yes he did but how many 6'5" guys were able to develop Lewis's kind of Power before 1985, the year Mike Spinks grew into a heavyweight and all the changes began to happen at heavyweight? 6'5" guys used to find it difficult to use full force because they were slower back then. Was it because under traditional training methods speed was not developed among the bigger men I don't know? But there was a lot of hard punching light heavyweights who could compete with Heavyweights right up until about 1964. Reznick quoted Mike Tyson on punching power earlier in this thread. why? Because fighters developed into what it took to be successful for the standard of the day. The duration of the rounds. What was taught then. Would that suit a man like Wlad? in another era Wlad would be developing against a higher work rate than was comfortable for him from day one. The stuff that made him so big and strong whilst still being effective would have been frowned upon then and did not exist anyway. vitali was what he needed to be in order to be successful at the time he was around. I won't disrespect him. But I wonder what he would have developed into had he came along in another era? Without so many tall fighters to develop against he would have adapted to what it took to be successful for a giant then. He would be running and training like fighters did then and eating like they did too. And coming against more competitively experienced journeyman too. yes Rid**** bowe at the weight he was against Evander the first time looks most likely to be the limit, as large as a heavyweight can be a fully functioning giant producing best boxing practice over that limit. Key point "the weight he was against Holyfeild that first time". Also, did he ever replicate this? Ali, Holmes and every other great Heavyweight under 230 had more than one example of being a great fighting 12 rounder. I admit they are my ideas. less mainstream perhaps, but in my opinion changes in the way the bigger heavyweights train among a larger pool of giants offers more logic than the world sudenly producing better athletes of a bigger size.
Right, well if you are saying "if he was born in 1920 blah blah and therefore would definitely be different, fine. That's different. But you're trying to have it two ways. If Lewis was born in 1920 blah blah blah, yes, he would be shorter, probably, because people tended to be, in fact he would be a very different human being and furthermore one who would be unlikely to leave the West Indies and pursuing a career in boxing. But IF he did, and IF he was shorter, and IF he had a shorter reach, and IF he still pursued a career in boxing and IF he got support enabling him to turn him professional he would, presumably, under "tradiational training methods", still have heart and power, natural atheleticism as well as being faster, with easier co-ordination. So, yes, I think he would be very successful under these circumstances, presuming no severe undermining of his support structure, that is, it remains the same, relative to peers in that era as it does in this one. It's unlikely he would be 6'5 back then. It's one of two things choklab - it's Lewis going back in a time machine and beating everyone up, OR, it's Lewis being born back then and suffering those "consequences" if that's what we want to call them. He'd be successful under either ridiculous proviso. More nosense. Of course they tried to develop speed in heavyweights back then. Yes, that includes big heavyweights. Are you insane? "Oh, we'll not bother teaching this big ******* to be fast, he's too big to bother with that." They're from an older time, they're not re****ed. If actually already explained this to you, but in any given thread, i'll have to explain any idea half a dozen times, i know that. Imagine the tiny % of people who are able to box as elites. Now, factor in that between 1900 and 2000, the average height increased by 4". What this means is that, statistically, naturally athletic men of 6'6/6'5/7'0, whichever height you've alighted on today, who also had chin, the heart, the desire to pursue a career in boxing was very small in 1920 compared to today, probably. Furthermore, the number of men who fit this description will increase as we, as a species, get taller. Therefore, it is statistically less likely that you will see a fast huge fighter in the past, than, for example, the future. Wladimir controls pace against big men with big reaches who want to work against him. That's what all fighters want against Wlad. In the past eras, guys want the same but are smaller. Adds up to good news for him. Absolutely no way to know. This is a good area for you, because you can talk all the nonsense and fantasy you like, and nobody can really tell you you are wrong. You can have Vitali developing into a ballerina based upon Ukrainian economics in the breadbasket era and nobody can really prove you are wrong. SO i'll leave you to your Marciano fuelled fantasies as far as this nonsense is concerned. Fine. But what you've hopelessly failed to deal with - and i must have raised this issue three, four times? - is Lewis and Wlad both performing better (and in Lewis's case, more fluidly) at higher weights. This is also true of Vitali.
One thing about Lewis was he was able to be both a boxer or a powerhouse. There just were not any Lennox Lewis types before Lennox. Not even close.
Wlad has had 3 standout performances imo. Byrd 2 Chagaev Pulev He was 240 above for them all. Definitely improved as he increased weight.
Why is it unlikely Lewis would be 6'5" in another era? Guys like Fred Fulton, Jess Willard, Primo Carnera, Abe Simon, Buddy Baer, Mike Dejohn, Duke Sabdong, Ernie Terrell, Chuck Wepner, Tex Cobb have always been around.
Because his genetic potential is unlikely to be fulfilled by the avialable nutrition and medical care. If 6'5 represents an upward limit for him, presuming, somehow, what he's born from the same egg and sperm and other bizarre freakish things you have to presume to make this work, he is liable to be shorter. Most people were. What you're pushing for here, basically, is for Lewis to be born in 1920...for him to do training exactly like 1940s training, not modern...but for him to be the same height and reach etc. so you can make him into Terrell or whoever. That's the precise set of criteria you are trying to organise to make this **** work. A point apparently so crucial you've selected it out of a 900 word post. Like, anyway, anything can be said with any real measure of surety But, go ahead, knock yourself out, keep working hard.