The only real arguments that I've heard in favor of Marciano ( or at least the ones that keep coming up ) are " Rocky would force sonny to stop throwing the jab" " Liston would fold under pressure as soon as someone stood up to him" " an extra 30 lbs in weight and 17 inches in reach are irrelevant " " Beating Floyd Patterson meant nothing, because Floyd was too terrified" Now there may be some valid arguments which could give some REAL insight as to why Marciano should be favored, but I have yet to hear such perspectives.
The same case could have been made for Liston vs Clay. Other than the weight and reach advantage, it would have all lined up in that fight in favor of Liston. How did it work out? And you may be exactly right. Liston may have beaten Marciano. I honestly don't know but it would have been a great fight.
Its only easy for Liston if he can get away with doing what he wants. My hunch (and it is only a hunch, after all neither of us can prove anything) is Liston will not be able to do what he wants all of the time. remember Harry greb? and since Rocky hits hard, well…accidents happen when you cant do what you want. A lie, my response was “The example you use Liston continues to throw against a retreating opponent he cannot reach. It is not the same as continuing to throw it against a low crowding mauler who is restricting the space Liston needs to really use all that leverage the way he does best.” a clear technical analysis -and I stand by it. In a normal situation fighters do not tend to fire consecutive treble jab combinations to the extent they usually do if they all miss. By jabs, I am not talking about feints.   I disagreed with that ratio, the number and the type of intentional jabs. You had to be counting feints. Marciano was not opened up with clean walk down jabs. It was not key to any success Charles had. Your point is Liston will pound Marciano with jabs then over power him inside. The Liston jab would be restricted in this fight. I pointed out Charles’s hooks not you. You have an obsession with Liston needing to jab to win - when Marciano was easier to open up (from a feint) with a hook from closer in. It would take a faster more crafty ATG than the plodding and predictable Liston to do this IMO.   Well I am sure you do, at least you are man enough to admit these were not clean jabs from a faster puncher than Liston, but the point is it was evident that you miss counted the number of jabs Charles landed with. Marciano’s being difficult to hit with the jab was mostly to do with him presenting less openings as he came in as it was to being any kind of deliberate specialist at sliding past the punch.   Was Louis’s jab restricted in this fight with Godoy?   I am confused as to why you think Joe Louis won the fight with the jab in a fight of few jabs? The fight is close mauling for the most part. Isn’t it more important than his jab not being as effective as usual. The point is it was not as effective and therefore Louis had a harder night than expected. Liston would have a harder night than expected if his jab is not as effective. Joe Loiuswon that fight because Godoy did not do enough to take his title. The Joe Louis jab was reduced to a lighter weapon because ofGodoys tactics.   No it was to show how a great jab can be neutralised using a similar style. Marciano would need more than neutralising the Liston jab. Godoy is a demonstration of another Charlie Goldman trained fighter.   No you did not. There was no repeated jabs connecting cleanly. Charles used them sparingly because there was not the openings. Rocky forced him to fight close.   It is a small majority not worthy of the outrage you seem to have for the opposite opinion from your own.   Ok, the fact that Marciano opponents were restricted to throwing less jabs than normal kind of says something. This hang up you have about me using a percentage in a figure of speech kind of way is a tad petty. However I think Charles hit Rocky with about 3 of 11 jabs in that round and only one was correctly. Even trying to help you out, if I use round one of the Moore fight - Archie does land more jabs but he was wise to throw the kind of touch jab that would allow him chance to change direction - a far more sophisticated procedure than what Sonny would have attempted. A touch jab is not the kind of cruncher Liston went in for. The kind of devil may care all eggs in one basket job brings the entire body forward into closer range even if it lands. With all his reach Liston used his jab to fight with not to score. It lands then he fights. It doesn’t land he still fights. Fighting, exchanging blows at close quarters would even things up a lot against Marciano. Rocky has a chance in exchanges because of the unpredictable angles his punches landed from.   Liston had a wonderful jab. The best and most destructive jab, a real battering ram but it is the kind of jab that is more effective against stand up boxers who are hoping to box Liston at mid range. Guys who want to jab with him or looking to time him from an upright stance. Against a low, smothering, elbow and shoulder stance is another matter. Not one bit. Marciano will get hit occasionally with the occasional jab Liston might get through .For the most part it is an inside fight where there is no jabbing room.   I suggest the lastarza fight. Lastarza does hit Rocky but usually pays for it when he tried the jab.  
  #1" Rocky would force sonny to stop throwing the jab" Marciano would restrict the use of the Liston jab in the way another Charlie Goldman trained fighter Arturo Godoy managed to restrict the great jab of Joe Louis. The crowding presenting less openings and forcing Louis to try other things. Godoy did not win the fight but he made it close ….without Marciano type power. Its not just the jab -its most of the outside punches. Rocky did get hit but it was inside where he opened up.   #2" Liston would fold under pressure as soon as someone stood up to him" Other fighters stood up to Liston and got beat …..but they were not ATG fighters.       #3 "an extra 30 lbs in weight and 17 inches in reach are irrelevant "   Of course it is relevant, Marciano will have to be careful but he is the better mauler of the two. Harry Greb was said to be a magnificent mauling human windmill who could give away weight. So was Rocky but with two handed power. Liston was both shorter and lighter than Joe Louis, still a fair contender on a win streak when Rocky mauled him. The size advantage did not help Louis inside, a place where usualy older fighters fare better if they have the advantage. #4" Beating Floyd Patterson meant nothing, because Floyd was too terrified" Although not word for word, Angelo Dundee said something along those lines - he used the words psyched out” and was more than qualified to attest if Patterson was able to perform or do himself justice against Liston. He was packing a disguise in those fights - such was the strain he was under.   other pointers… "Marciano was the more proven inside fighter". "Marciano had a better engine." "Marciano could fight 15 rounds." "Marciano has more pedigree in that he came from behind to win fights at elite level."  
A technical analysis? It's not even a response? Your original position was that a fighter missing with three jabs abandons the jab. I prove that this is bull**** with film. You "reply" by describing why Ali making Liston miss with nearly every jab is not technically as bad as for Liston as Marciano, "a low crowding mauler" denying Liston "leverage". Even a non English speaker would consider this a non-answer. So no, it was not a lie. Furthermore you again, for the third time in the thread I think, neglect to deal with the most important phase. Over and over again you go striaght to Marciano "crawling all over" Liston like a spider. There's not a word about his inability to "crawl all over" Charles or any kind of effort to deal with the foot and half of space between them and what would be the most incredible performance in swarming history - crossing that space against one of the best punchers the division has produced.   [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeGFJI_ctVE[/ame] 2:20. Flush jab. Easy land. 2:31. Marciano comes straight ahead. Charles pops out a range-finder. Easy land. 2:44. Jab to the neck. Rocky takes the sting out of it with a lean but it's an easy land. (2:56. Lead left hook. Easy land) 2:58. Jab to the head. Marciano makes Charles miss. 3:01. Jab to the head. Marciano partially parries this and it lands on the top of the head rather than the face. 3:31. Jab to the gut. 3:46. Double jab. The first one is short the second one lands. 4:23. Range finder lands flush, to set up the right hand. 4:28. Flush jab on the chin. Marciano doesn't even move. All this time, he is also landing straight rights without any real trouble, too. What an incredible waste of my time. No, I didn't count any feints. Nor did I count "left jabs that were turned into left hooks" which was your bizarre accusation the first time I produced this data. I don't think any great fighter is, but I think Maricano is more open than you allow, and I think film shows it, and I think that's been demonstrated pretty clearly. Even restricted it is liable to do damage and gather points. I personally think Liston will land at a good rate with an active, world class jab and a 17" reach advantage. Call me old fashioned. Yes. I know. That's what my posts says. I'm now pointing out to you how hurtful it is to point out that a man you are trying to pretend was a wizard at ditching the jab was easier to hit with lead left hooks. It's also totally inaccurate as this hardly happened. Jesus Christ, what is wrong with you? No, I don't. I just have to talk about it a lot because i've been drawn into an argument with someone who believe that someone with a world class jab and a seventeen inch reach advantage who liked to jab and committed to his jab wouldn't have his jab as a factor in the fight. That's outlandish to say the least, and is naturally going to be something of a sticking point.   Some of them were, some of them weren't, the same as in any other boxing match ever fought. Christ alive. I've recounted them here with time-coding so you can check.   Yes. Are Joe Louis and Sonny Liston different fighters? Did you know that JOe Louis has a TWO INCH REACH ADVANTAGE and that Liston would have A SEVENTEEN INCH ADVANTAGE IN REACH? Do you have any idea, as a former boxer, the difference that this makes in general strategy and timing? It's an absolutely enormous difference - it's ****ing massive.   I'm confused about why you're confused given that i've explained it very clearly twice now.     There were a number of jabs, landed rather easily, at a HUGE connect %, rather than the laughable 10% connection rate you insisted upon. "Marciano made 90% of jabs miss with all his opponents." Fantasy.   I've been as clear as I can possibly be that i'm not outraged by the opposite opinion, just a bit disturbed by the fantasy you personally are pedalling. Although i've said it THREE ****ING TIMES - like everything else i've said in this post - here it is again. I've no problem with Marciano as a pick (see any one of the three other posts i've made saying this, for reasons why).   And what is this latest made up statistic based upon? How big is your sample for this statistic? How many fights do you have raw data for? Do the fighters throw "fewer jabs" throughout the fight, or just in the later rounds? By what percentage do the number of jabs opponents throw decrease? but it is YOUR method of communicating. You were the first person in the thread to start throwing about percentages. You are completely wrong. May I see your breakdown in time-code as the one I presented above? Thanks. Yes, a lot of fighters throw these punches in a fight they expect to win on points rather than by ko. Unfortunately for you they still count. Yes. He would have been STUPID AS **** to try to throw touch jabs with a SEVENTEEN INCH REACH ADVANTAGE More made up pish. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWbpM99wD2M[/ame] 1:39. Liston lands the jab, then takes a step back. 2:18. Liston lands a jab and holds his position. 2:23 Liston throws a jab and holds his position. Why do you do this to yourself? What you are saing is contradicted ON FILM. BY WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN REAL LIFE. What you are describing is the jab Liston threw when he wanted to close the distance, which, as a puncher and stronger man he wanted to do often. He might do it against Rocky often. But you make Marciano out to be some sort of defensive specialist - and then make Liston out to be some sort of jabbing automation who falls in behind every jab. Why? He did what he felt was best at the time. As we've now seen, your summary of Liston's jab is innacurate and useless.  
Very good. This is the first time you have dealt directly with this problem. You have a very definite opinion which is easy to agree with or refute. Here is my question to you - Upon which Liston performance is this opinion based? Where, on film, can I see him struggling to land the jab on a low, smothering, elbow and shoulder stance? Not one bit. Marciano will get hit occasionally with the occasional jab Liston might get through .For the most part it is an inside fight where there is no jabbing room. OK. I fear this will be another enormous waste of my time, but I will play. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBgf4H2ybho[/ame] .33 LaStraza throws a jab. Gets countered. .37 LaStraza throws a jab. No counter. .38 LaStaraza throws two jabs. Gets bulled to the ropes. No counter. .46 LaStarza throws a jab. No counter. .50 LaStarza throws two jabs. Is not directly countered but is bulled back to the ropes. 1.00 LaStaraza throws a jab. No counter. 1.03 LaStarza throws a jab. No counter. 1.04 LaStarza throws 3 jabs. Is not directly countered but gets bulled back to the ropes. 1:21 LaStarza throws a jab. Countered. 1:29 LaStarza throws a jab. No counter. 1:38 LaStarza throws a jab. No counter. 1:52 LaStarza throws a jab and lands two punches behind it. 1:57 Jab and right hand. No counter. Is any of this doing anything for you? Are you beginning to understand why your claim that Marciano will counter almost every single Liston jab is so ridiculous? Do you see why someone making that, coupled with claiming a 90% slip rate across his career for Maricano as fact and a second cornerstone of reasoning for a Marciano win is so ridiculous?
Yes this one lands but charles has already missed 2 so hes landed 1 out of 3 so far and there is most of the round left to go.   Not a scoring blow. Insufficient force. Im not sure of the contact. Wouldn’t score. ( This is a scoring blow. A beauty! but not a jab.   Agreed another miss.   Not a scoring punch, you are corect about contact but its nothing but a reactionary fending off with n open hand.   Not that conclusive. out of range. No contact. Not a jab. Charles touching with an extending open glove before taking aim with the right. Insufficient force. Direct hit! Charles lands for the second time with a scorring jab. Ratio: 2 of 12 moments were actual landing jabs that would score. Nobody getting hit repeatedly with jabs what so ever. Even when you try to blind with science you cant be trusted. [
Mee, Tosches nor Steen, probably all 3 sit down to pee, and would all be in fear and awe of the Liston legend or they would not have had the fascination to write a book about the man, I would not expect them to say he quit when the going got tough. I am going by a lot of boxing insiders and old timers who have been around the ring and streets for a while and they say Sonny either quit or took a dive. Liston looks great against Cleveland Williams and he looks great against Patterson but I myself are not sure how he would react to a great fighter who had heart and courage and the most power Liston ever faced. For me their is a crack in Liston's armor...you say he did not quit against Ali but I wonder who did not come out of the corner for fight 1, and I guess you feel it was the Jack Johnson anchor punch that Ali landed in the 1st round in the rematch....I agree Ali had multiple 1st round KO's with that punch through-out his career and it caused Liston to roll around for 3 minutes. I think Liston would be a hard fight for Marciano but I think Rocky's crouching style and awareness of the Liston jab and power makes Rocky a bit more cautious and careful but he comes on in the exchanges and gets to Liston on the inside with some good power punches and awkward combo's much like he did against Moore, and I do think Sonny feels power that he never felt before. Rocky could get dropped but I see him getting stronger as the fight goes on and tests Sonny in the stamina department and there will be a heart check...I can see Sonny going down and out with his face laying flush on the floor like he did vs 6'ft 198lb Leotis Martin. Liston would be a dangerous fight (I would assume for anyone) but I think he would fall short against most of the very best. that is my opinion.
Oh yes I survived a sexual attack but only from a totally impotent ******…. Mgrain listed a whole load of stats from a fight (that were wrong anyway) to prove a throw away “figure of speech” was wrong. He might be a bit petty but is still a good poster though. My point (off the top of my head) was that Marciano was hard to nail with (and left few openings for) a long, outside jab. And Mcgrain proved me right. See if Mcgrain can prove me wrong this time: 5’7’’ Albert Westphal (neither world class nor rated in any world) was hit with only 6 of 21 jabs from Sonny Liston.
I didn't enjoy it. It made me feel dirty. What, for around 30%, or average? That is completely normal. choklab, I don't think you really understand what happens in a boxing ring.
Baring in mind Albert westphal was not world class and the result Liston recorded against him could have been achieved by most top 5 rated contenders Listons jab stats of that fight was only 6 landing of 21 correct jabs. Liston was even countered a few times. Not that good against a 57 guy who was not that good of an opponent for a world #1 contender.