Rocky Marciano vs. Sonny Liston

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hookie, Sep 25, 2012.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Walcott getting old overnight after using himself up in the war with Marciano, (not to mention a terrible concussion where he was out for minutes) is more understandable than Liston getting old over night between his last victorious fight with Floyd and his first fight with Cassius Clay.
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    you compared marciano with tall southpaw middleweight Alan minter...
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    You agree that Patterson was a shell of himself and psyched out the first time. The second time you think Patterson was much better, faster than the first time and at his "absolute prime". Going by the film of the second fight I don't think floyd was.

    I am saying that I don't think Patterson looked faster or much better. He looked as tense and as hesitant and as hittable as the first time. In fact Liston got going earlier than in the first fight. He could tell Floyd still wasn't a threat.

    Regardless of not feeling as much pressure before the fight and having a good camp when the bell rang floyd was the same. Now if you agree he was a shell the first time you either agree he was a shell the second time or you want to believe he was better but still got smashed to smithereens because Liston was so good. If the film shows Floyd not taking the initiative and not looking better and faster second time around I am inclined to decide he was just as psyched the second time. He got hit and panic set in. This time he was facing his demons head on and regardless of how well he felt before hand when it came down to it the performance shows to me that Floyd still could not hold it together. It dosnt look like he was over what happened the last time. He's fighting two people, he's fighting himself because he wants to fight and Liston.

    There is a moment where the bell goes and Liston has not quite turned around to start. For a man who should be wanting revenge for last time Floyd was not running at Sonny to get in first before Liston was ready. He hesitates, waits then starts once Sonny is looking at him. It's not the reaction of the most fired up fighter I have seen. By comparison Floyd was like a hungry wild cat in his rematch with ingo.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,699
    46,360
    Feb 11, 2005
    Most 39 year old guys, 70 fights into a heavyweight career, having gone 11-8 over their past 19 fights, would be pretty used up, Rock or no Rock.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    If you say so, I'm always wiling to defer to your technological insight.
     
  6. Turner72

    Turner72 Member Full Member

    172
    6
    Oct 31, 2010
    Maximum LOLage :lol::nut:lol:
     
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Walcott was certainly a more live champion on the night he faced marciano than the Patterson who showed up for Liston. Teddy Brenner said it was the best Walcott ever looked, where as Patterson said he was a shell of himself.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,699
    46,360
    Feb 11, 2005
    People say a lot of things. Even when the numbers confirm otherwise. Walcott was at the tail end of a long, brutal career wherein he was largely a trial horse brought in last minute from his day job to get beat up. He had gone 11-7 over his last 18. He was 38 years old. Patterson was 27 years old, would fight another decade and post some of his best performances.
     
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    The numbers show Walcott wasnt a more "live" champion on the night he fought Marciano than the psyched out floyd that Sonny beat? Does the film?

    Floyd was younger but he did not get going or look himself in either fight with Liston.
     
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,441
    9,428
    Jul 15, 2008
    Really ? Ingo beat one guy in Machen of any note … Liston crushed Williams twice, destroyed Valdez and flatted Harris in 1 while it took Floyd 12 .. Cus wanted nothing to do with Liston, absolutely nothing … he knew …
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,699
    46,360
    Feb 11, 2005
    The film shows Walcott fending off a younger, fitter fighter for as long as he could, then getting tired and sloppy.

    I am sure Liston's physical superiority had nothing to do with Floyd's failure to "get going".
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Liston deserved his shot, but not until 1961. It was not Sonnys fault that ingo landed the fight with Machen in 1958, that win eclipsed Sonny in 1958.

    Liston beat Harris in 1960. Valdes was not #1 when Sonny beat him because Machen and others had already beat him. It is well known Williams was not yet a top ten fighter until after the Liston fights.

    Like I already said, the wins in 1960 were what made Sonny, the wins before that could not warrant mandatory status.

    For sonny to have been truly avoided would have meant him having better wins over current rated fighters on win streaks before 1959 than Ingo. Nothing Liston did until 1962 was worthy of interupting the Patterson-Johansson series. Sonny was only first in line once it was resolved..
     
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    The film shows Walcott fighting his challenger every step of the way though. Does the film show Floyd doing the same? I've never read Walcott say "marciano fought the shell of myself".
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: No I don't. Where do you get this stuff from?

    :lol: no I don't you ****ing fruitcake. I think that Patterson was faster than Liston. YOU have been asked to explain how on earth you can defend claiming the opposite, which you seem to have done, and like every other difficult point you are challenged on in what is perhaps the most bizarre world view I have ever come across on this forum, you decline to answer.

    He was absolutely inarguably in his absolute prime.


    Faster than himself the first time or faster than Liston? Because you've made both claims, I can't know. Talking to you is extremely confusing.

    What hesitancy?? Johansson threw something like fifteen punches at Floyd before Floyd threw one in the first fight. Against Liston, Patterson let Liston throw fewer without reply, and threw earlier in the round...Patterson looked far more "hesitant" against Johansson than he did against Liston. Against Bonavena, he threw fewer punches than he did in the two minutes against Liston AND he tried to land the long left hook earlier against Liston than he did against Bonavena.

    In other words, he wasn't "hesitant" against Liston at all, he showed around the same level of aggression as he did against most fighters.

    I just think you don't know the fighter that you are talking about. Patterson often "had a look" against punchers

    He looked "hittable" to you.

    This, despite the fact that Patterson steps off the first two jabs Liston throws, the first one-two he throws, slips the next jab, before finally being hit by a jab going back (a telling blow for anyone not ******ed and interested in this fight who happens to be reading this). He then makes Liston miss three consecutive jabs and at this point in the fight has been hit twice, for a connect percentage of around 20%. I know you struggle with punch connection rates, but trust me, this is not high. Patterson is the opposite of "hittable" in this opening section. Either because you are blinded by bias or, more excusably, you are mis-interpreting the very tangible danger in Liston's crowding Patterson as punishment.

    Liston then beats Patterson's kidney in a clinch and when they are broken, Liston lands a jab and a right hand. Patterson is badly hurt by the right hand - the fight is basically over from this point.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckimu7s1yiE

    And Liston was right. But this is no reflection on Patterson. Patterson was PHYSICALLY overmatched by Liston. The first time he gets hit by a hard punch he will be put straight into trouble. Meanwhile, because Liston is not respectful of Patterson's hitting power he is able to move forwards with impunity. These are the keys to the fight.

    Patterson could have believed, literally, that he was Superman and he would still have been knocked out in the first or second round. He just didn't have the physical ability necessary to compete with a heavyweight of Liston's physical and technical abilities. The mix is too much for him.

    There is literally no evidence on the fight film to suppor the notion that Patterson was slower than Liston, hesitant, or hittable to a degree that is in-ordinary. These are all claims that you have made and they are all false.

    This match up particularly, Liston-Marciano, makes you hysterical.
     
  15. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    I don't know what fight you're watching, but it isn't the same as the rest of the world. Patterson fought like a rabbit in headlights, and only threw a couple of decent right hands out of desperation when he knew he was on the way to being KO'd.