Two blokes who were very capable at their best but didnt always bring that to the table in every fight. Comparable careers in a way. Nate could win this against poor, average or even good version of Uncie Rog...I would give Roger an edge if both came in at their very best though.
Whatarock i disagree at there very best i see Campbell winning. Roger was a good boxer. Had a great jab and skills and had a decent dig. However he had very bad stamina problems and gassed out late in fights. Campbell is more of a solid pressure fighter when he wants to be and can make a fighter fight at his pace. He is extremly fit and at 30 odd years old out lasted the tough and fit Juan Diaz. The biggest question is can Campbell take Rogers shots early? I think he can as the Galaxy Warrior has a pretty decent chin. Also can Roger survive in the later rounds and cling to an early lead, i dotn see it. Campbell late stoppage
Roger is the better boxer and puncher,nate has the better chin though.At jr.Welter Roger would beat the hell out of Campbell.At lightwieght Campbell could possibly wear Mayweather down.
