Mcvey its funny because archie moore essentially cleaned out the young top contenders in the division even more than marciano did because moore dominated the likes of valdez 2x, henry, baker, harold johnson. pretty impressive on moores part. Thats why marciano deserves all the credit in the world for beating the **** out of archie.
Moore must be about the only fighter who Marciano beat ,who had it still in him to beat contenders after being through the ringer with Rocky.
I would like to see Mr. Magoo comment on lastarza vs henry, valdez, baker. These 3 young black heavyweight contenders were better more dangerous fighters than lastarza and layne were, and marciano did not fight one of these men.
why did you even bother to post this question? you obviously don't think much of lastarza based on your predicitions, it's like asking how floyd patterson would do against the hardest punchers in history, he'd be ko'd each time.
? LOL I think very well of Roland Lastarza and rate him in my top 75 heavyweights of all time...... I posed this question because I love to hear different opinions and debate a very interesting era in my perspective. Lastarza was a very good defensive heavyweight, but just because I pick certain fighters over him based on styles I get critisized for not thinking highly of the guy? Its guys like Clarence Henry who are very underated because they never got their shot at the rock like roland did.