Ron Borges' top 10 Mexican fighters of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Dec 2, 2009.


  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Personally, I'd have Marco Antonio Barrera at 5, with Zarate at 6 and Lopez maybe at 7 or 8.
     
  2. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    Better than I expected. Number 1 is highly debatable. Saldivar is too low. Not bad though.
     
  3. EleventhHour

    EleventhHour Got Dat Black & Gold Soul Full Member

    2,523
    1
    Oct 27, 2009
    If Erik Morales isn't on that list he'd better be #11.
     
  4. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    No1 is correct..... easily.

    Also, the only acceptable way for Barrera to make a top 10 list & Morales not to is if Barrera is no10 because they should only be about 1 place apart regardless of who you have ahead.

    **** list.
     
  5. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Ron Borges writes some ******ed **** sometimes I am very aware of the old timers from Mexico and although Kid Azteca was an excellent fighter there is no way he should get the nod over Baby Arizmendi who went 2-3 against arguablly the greatest fighter in the history of Boxing which is Hammerin Hank. In fact in their first fight reports have it that he domintated Armstrong in that one. He would be higher on my list but He also had a lot of losses(although many were against great comp
    Also I cant see why he doesnt have Morales on this list.


    This MEXICAN has the Top 10 looking like this



    1.JULIO CESAR CHAVEZ
    2.SALVADOR SANCHEZ
    3.RUBEN OLIVARES
    4.RICARDO LOPEZ
    5.MARCO A BARRERA
    6.ERIK MORALES
    7,MIGUEL CANTO
    8.CARLOS ZARATE
    9.BABY ARIZMENDI
    10.VICENTE SALDIVAR

    I didnt rank Marquez since he is still fighting but if he were to retire today id put him somewher between 7-9.
    4,
     
  6. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,026
    18,291
    Jul 29, 2004
    Lopez to high IMO...by my criteria anyway.
     
  7. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    I agree. How do you rank a guy based on potential held back because of a promoter? Lopez had his hands full with the best guy he faced who wasnt all that great in Alvarez.
     
  8. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Seems like lot of Esb fans complain than Lopez is Overrated here but i see the opposite I think hes criticized too much here and yet he is undefeated and a perfect technichian in my mind,in fact I almost put him ahead of Olivares.
    I dont feel like getting into a debate either cause I think i did that already about 50 times here.
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Skillset+resume is how you should define a fighter IMO.

    Hence Olivares is far the more accomplished fighter. Lopez was fantastic, but no way is he anywhere near Olivares in all-time standings, regardless of promotional disputes/weak weight class.:deal
     
  10. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    If you want to nit pick on one opponent well i guarantee you that I could do that to just about every ATG. You could come up with a reason on every fighter as to why they werent that great. Alvarez was also never beaten either in his prime(except by dq) and he later avenged that.
     
  11. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    That is why I begrudgingly but him ahead of Lopez.
     
  12. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Its not nitpicking when you look at his record as a whole, which mostly consists of inexperienced ex Thai kick boxers. There isnt really a lot of substance to his resume realistically, just a lot of wins over unamed opponents for the most part. He was a great fighter, but you cant rank someone on potential in my opinion.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Begrudgingly????

    Because Olivares wasn't really, really skilled as well? Like, as skilled as Lopez but in different areas?

    Yes he was, and clearly the better fighter.
     
  14. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Look Ive seen tapes of Olivares before you tube or the Internet existed so im aware of his skills especially at Bantam. I know that he was just not some one dimensional bomber like some unknowledgable fans might assume. Its kind of hard to compare the two when it comes to skills cause each guy did something better in one area that you could make an argument for. I picked Olivares based on resumes despite his inconsistentcies. Power definitly goes to Rockabye Ruben although he was skilled too i think Lopez gets the nod there as well as being faster.Ruben definitly the better body puncher. Consistancy Lopez,even if he fought the comp ruben did he wouldnt have lost some of the fights that Ruben did. Its close and I gave the nod to Ruben so actually when it comes down to it you are in agreement with me.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    No it's not close.

    Olivares was in the STRONGEST BANTAMWEIGHT DIVISION OF ALL TIME.

    Arguably the best Bantam ever (bar Jofre, though that is debatable) and historically Bantam is possibly the most stacked division in terms of talent (again debatable)

    Straw/Light-Fly is not.

    Regardless of how old you are, always saying 'I watched it at the time' doesn't mean you are right.

    Mexican fighters (for me-

    Olivares at 2.

    Lopez at 6/7 (depending on what mood I'm in)