Ron Lyle versus Deontay Wilder would be sanctioned murder.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rollin, Dec 19, 2023.


  1. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,483
    7,131
    Nov 17, 2021
    No.

    I am not obliged to.

    The burden of proving Wilder wouldn't get dominated in a 12-0 landslide against Parker had he fought him earlier on is on you. The presumption inactivity and age took something out of him will always be reasonable, but at the end of the day defending Deontay Wilder is an intellectual cross to bear until this forum is scorched and cast down into the depths of the dark web.

    Wilder's sad career provided no clear basis for an argument he would have changed the result if he was younger. Only countless examples of him fighting B and C class opposition with embarrassing blemishes all the while, and an eventual destruction at the hands of Fury—the very same man whose best wins are aging extremely poorly, and who is shaping up to be something of a disappointment himself.
     
  2. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Ok then.

    Show me that you "know boxing" by explaining what "good timing" is and how Wilder exemplified the same.
     
  3. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,660
    38,157
    Jan 14, 2022
    Ortiz was older than Wilder was vs Parker when Wilder fought Ortiz. So if that's considered Wilder's best win then that win should also have asterisk over it considering the age of Ortiz if we are applying the same logic with Wilder.
     
  4. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,483
    7,131
    Nov 17, 2021
    Equally fair to point out (for one the modernist's dream comes true) Wilder lives in an era of superior nutrition, superior borderline illegal substance, and infinitely safer matchmaking—in his case especially.

    Crucify me for generalizing, but in general fighters used to age faster and somewhat worse.

    If we compare the career opposition mileage it gets grotesque, and that's putting aside what nearly bleeding out on an operating table and suffering heart attacks through the operations took out of Lyle.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef, JohnThomas1 and Claude like this.
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,799
    51,835
    Mar 21, 2007
    No you’re right, but 38 and inactive is still 38 and inactive. The rush to anoint Wilder awful is almost as unsightly as the rush to pick him over Joe Louis. Parker had some plan and some nerve but he benefited from Wilders odd plan and age.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Rollin like this.
  6. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,660
    38,157
    Jan 14, 2022
    The thing is though why people have that opinion is because Wilder has a very weak resume, so when he gets dominated against one of the few ranked or notable opponents hes fought in almost 50 odd fights. Then people will have the impression that Wilder was very overhyped.

    If Wilder had beaten a few more notable opponents and knocked them out impressively, then maybe people would be more fair in regards to him losing in his late 30s.

    But when you look at his resume when hes stepped up he lost 26 out of the 29 rounds vs Fury only winning rounds he floored Fury in and 2 of them were vs poor versions of Fury. Lost pretty much every round to an old Ortiz in both fights before his power bailed him out.

    So looking at those fights or when Wilder did step up his overall skillset has never really impressed, it's mostly his game changing power which was impressive to a certain extent. But again not really shown it against many ranked opponents or notable fighters.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,799
    51,835
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah i can see why that might be the case.

    Hopefully around here though people are educated enough to understand what they were looking at last night.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  8. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,660
    38,157
    Jan 14, 2022
    Well I think its combination of two things Wilder is a bit past it but also Parker is a tough stylistically match up for him anyway.

    Parker did good things in there and came in fairly heavy I believe 250 pounds is quite heavy for him isn't it ? He went in with the gameplan Fury had in the 2nd fight to force Wilder on the backfoot.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,799
    51,835
    Mar 21, 2007
    Wilder was circling from the first bell, he starts to circle right then changes his mind and cirlces left. In the first second of the first round he was side-stepping, and he was using the whole ring. It was absolutely baffling. I do credit Parker, because I thought he boxed perfectly and showed some stones, but Wilder was awful. You've mentioned his fights with Fury - Wilder was far better in the Fury fights than the Parker fight. He was better being stopped against Fury than doing the distance with Parker. Night and day. Unless we're saying Parker has numerous advantages that Fury doesn't, the writing is on the wall.

    People will and should use the Parker loss to run Wilder down because that's the first time he's lost to a non-generational fighter, but he's 38 and inactive and looked atrocious.
     
  10. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,660
    38,157
    Jan 14, 2022
    Well I don't think Wilder looked any better when Fury dismantled him in their 2nd fight, and that fight showed Wilder was very ineffective with his power when forced on the backfoot.

    The 3rd fight yes Wilder did look better but you also have to take into account a few things. Fury was grossly out of shape he weighed the same in that fight as he did vs Ngannou just for context. Fury was also coming off a 15 month lay off as was Wilder, but the lay off didn't seem to effect Wilder then or was Fury just in way worse form compared to 2nd fight ?

    But yeah definitely Wilder showed more fire and eagerness in 3rd Fury fight.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,799
    51,835
    Mar 21, 2007
    Funnily enough I just got finished watching some of Parker's postfight interview. He is almost unmarked but describes a "little bump" behind his ear and other than that "just the usual" having been in the ring with Wilder for 12. Fury said "I have a big lump on my temple here, I don't know what's gone on with it - it's come right out. I had to overcome a lot in this fight" after spending half that with Wilder in II. Fury seems to have felt something that Parker didn't. That was my impression also.

    Fury is better than Parker.

    I don't really know what's being driven at here. If it's that Wilder has had his true self revealed at 38, I disagree. If it that this was the best that Wilder could ever have produced against Parker, I disagree. If it's that Wilder wasn't affected by his inactivity, I disagree. If it's that Wilder was in his prime, I disagree. If it's that this is somehow some sort of defining fight for Wilder's legacy (Such as it is), I disagree. Wilder might do a Hopkins and elevate Parker a la Calzaghe by looking epic next time out, but being old and having not beaten a ranked fighter this decade, I doubt it. If he retires, or trundles in, this fight will look like exactly what it probably was, an old fighter whose inactivity left him vulnerable.

    Again, Parker still deserves a lot of praise for his temperament and plan and he deserves another run at the big time. But he is another fighter who hasn't beaten a ranked guy in years, years and years.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,524
    21,610
    Jul 30, 2014
    I doubt it. Wilder's not allowed any excuses whatsoever for any losses or even subpar performances, yet not allowed any credit for his victories. It's very odd. I estimate a solid 40% of the general forum, said his fight with Helenius was fixed.

    I find it funny people aren't giving Wilder any slack for his inactivity, when Parker himself cited Wilder's inactivity, as a weakness he was going to take advantage of.

    I agree. Wilder seems to past prime at 38 and looked better against Fury in all three of their fights (yes even the second one).

    I also find it odd; people think this has any relevance, on a Lyle-Wilder matchup. Aside from the fact that they fought nothing alike, Parker is infinitely more proven than Lyle.
     
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,601
    20,145
    Apr 3, 2012
    Ah, a special set of circumstances for a fighter who you aren’t especially fond of. I’ve never seen that before on this forum.
     
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,601
    20,145
    Apr 3, 2012
    The second Ortiz fight. Wilder at that point had already lost the volume that he showed earlier in his career, but he still timed a well schooled boxer with a beautiful shot.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,799
    51,835
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, i'm not sure slack is the right word, because that's his choice. But it's obvious enough that if you're old and not fighting you start to slip. But he was still expected to win because he was patchy when active - right hand touch, winner. 28-1 was the Ring Wilder-Pakrer poll in favor of Wilder.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.