Rothwell-Velasquez-- premature stoppage?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by Chileno606, Oct 25, 2009.


  1. Chileno606

    Chileno606 Gentleman & Scholar Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Mar 25, 2007
    I thought that was a bull**** stoppage :twisted:
     
  2. Koa

    Koa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,380
    3
    Sep 24, 2004
    Agreed. Velasquez was all over him, but that was a premature stoppage. The tide of many one sided fights have been changed with one blow. Rothwell is a guy with that sort of power, I doubt his chances, but he should have been given the opportunity.
     
  3. Chileno606

    Chileno606 Gentleman & Scholar Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Mar 25, 2007
    Exactly...at least let the guy go out on his shield fighting..not when hes still fresh and has his wits about him..
     
  4. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    i dunno i thought he was lucky it didnt get stopped before, bad stoppage in a sense he wasent really hurt but a good one in the sense that Rothwell was not intelligently defending himself.
     
  5. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    It was an excellent stoppage. Rothwell was exhausted and only going to take a prolongued beating. Great stoppage by the referee
     
  6. boxingcar

    boxingcar Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,525
    1
    Oct 5, 2005
    They wanted velasquez to win. (but anyway , Rothwell was still getting owned). Who knows what might have happened ...

    I predict the same bull**** will happen to Carwin if he can't ko lesnar. They're not gonna let him win by decision or there's gonna be a bull**** premature stopage if they can do it...
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,374
    Nov 30, 2006
    His own fault. That position he was in was ******ed.
     
  8. Hrak

    Hrak Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,673
    2
    Mar 15, 2006
    Premature, but it wasn't gone change the result of the fight.
     
  9. Monoxide

    Monoxide Active Member Full Member

    565
    0
    Aug 28, 2009
    They should have let him stood up but it wouldn't have changed anything anyway
     
  10. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    I thougt it was a bit premature but he was getting stopped anyway.
     
  11. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Ref said before the start of the round that he wanted to see something and he couldn't keep taking punches. I think it was a mercy stoppage cos he felt that Rothwell could continue to survive a massive onslaught that may never stop.
     
  12. bachatu

    bachatu Pro Full Member

    4,779
    8
    Feb 25, 2006
    Rothwell was done and was getting manhandled every way possible in there. He posed no threat to Velasquez.
     
  13. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    It was early, would have made more sense to stop it at times during the first round of anything.

    He was getting blitzed but that particular point wasn't a good point to stop it.
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,374
    Nov 30, 2006
    The way I look at it is: was that a defensive posture or an "I don't even know what the hell I'm doing other than having my head pounded into the cage with my hands nowhere near my face" posture?