Rounds that should be scord 10-8

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by teeto, Dec 3, 2007.


Page 2 of 3
  1. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    No, then you do not know to score a fight. If you blocked 30 punches and were hit with just one, if you do not reply yourself, you lose the round.

    If a round is even in a judges eyes, he should then (and only then) use intangables like effective agressiveness and defensive qualities to decide who won the round.
     
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    #16
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007

    :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    #17
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    You are trying to prove me wrong by being silly in the extreme. I never said that. I said you can edge a round by showing a bit of defensive brilliance in a close round (did you not read my example).

    Do you think thats wrong.

    And yes , when Willie Pep won THAT ROUND without throwing a single punch , if the other guy would've landed a jab (as you said) , I would still give Pep the round. Because he still would've far outclassed him.

    I'm not the one who doent know how to scor rounds here
     
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    #18
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Well yes you are, and the Pep story is just that my friend;)

    Punches landed with the correct part of the glove are the primary source of who wins a round. The intangables you mention should only be used to break ties in close rounds.

    Boxing is a sport not an art.
     
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    #19
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Are you mad ? Do you only give points to amount of punches landed ? No credit comes from you for ringcraft or defensive brilliance ? Much to learn you have
     
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    #20
  6. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    You are not reading what I wrote;)
     
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    #21
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    You edited it after I replied. So you would have give that round against Pep if one jab of no quality would have landed with the correct part of the glove ?
     
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    #22
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    And a good judge never gives an even round , you should know that. Judges who giv even rounds are doing so due to their own inability to determine who is the better BOXER. We discussed this on a thread a while ago
     
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    #23
  9. LennoxGOAT

    LennoxGOAT Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,234
    4
    Apr 22, 2006
    I wish more judges issued 10-8 rounds without knockdowns.
     
    LennoxGOAT, Dec 3, 2007
    LennoxGOAT, Dec 3, 2007
    #24
  10. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Yes, the primary source of scoring is with landing a punch with the correct part of the glove. Intangables break ties, if there is no tie to break, you do not need them. A Judge has to use judgement, in deciding the effectiveness of a punch, but if it is totally one way, there is no judgement needed.

    Judging should be as scientific as is possible with humans involved. But the human element is needed to use intangables when it is felt it is needed by a judge.
     
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    #25
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    You are trying to prove a point by thinking you can patronise me with this factual talk that is really just opinion. Not gna work . If you were so confident you are right then just make the statement in plain English- if one nothing jab wouldve hit Willie Pep in that round , then you would consider Pep being on the wrong end of one way traffic and Pep's work would be mere intangibles. Is this your statement
     
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    teeto, Dec 3, 2007
    #26
  12. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Parlez vous Anglais? ;)

    I have given an answer as clear as is possible when it comes to judging a boxing fight. If it was as simple as saying something is black or white, we would have no need for this thread because every fight that goes the distance would pick the right winner...

    Sorry mate there is no magic wand to sort out judging in boxing, it is always going to be subjective, but there are primary and secondary concerns that a judge must make a judgement about. And intangables should never over take the facts, only help break them down, so that a judge can generally give one fighter ten points and the other nine.
     
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    TBooze, Dec 3, 2007
    #27
  13. El Bombasto

    El Bombasto Ask yo momma Full Member

    3,269
    2
    May 23, 2006
    another problem with judging is 10-7 rounds, how hard is it to kd again after you just kd'd him?
     
    El Bombasto, Dec 3, 2007
    El Bombasto, Dec 3, 2007
    #28
  14. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    There are more aspects to boxing than simply who lands more punches is all I was saying , and you are sort of proving me right with your magic wand comment
     
    teeto, Dec 4, 2007
    teeto, Dec 4, 2007
    #29
  15. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    :huh Call me thick if you want (I am) but how?
     
    TBooze, Dec 4, 2007
    TBooze, Dec 4, 2007
    #30
Page 2 of 3