Rousey/Holm was more exciting than...

I thought the same when I watched the fight. I wanted Holm to win because I think Rousey was too ****y, and she kicked the snot out of her.

Floyd basically avoided a fight against Manny; out of the ring for years and in the ring for 36 minutes. At least the two MMA women tried to prove who was superior, and brought it.

I have been a boxing fan for 40 years, and there are less and less fights that excite me, that's for sure.

 

Holms pretty much outboxed this girl (yes she threw a couple of kicks but 90% of that performance was boxing) your p4p #1 just got SCHOOLED by a boxer think about it man... Take any MMA fighter, give him 4 or 5 years or whatever in boxing training and he still ain't beating p4p #1 boxer. EVER.

MMA is to boxing what an electrician is to an electrical engineer.

 

Then who just beat your p4p #4?

Before you come back at me with she isn't, this is the archive of the official UFC p4p list before the Holms fight.

https://web.archive.org/web/20151106014602/http://www.ufc.com/rankings?id=

Edit: I realise my mistake, she wasn't ranked p4p #1, still p4p #4 is high enough.

 

90% of it was boxing though, that kick was just a formality she could have finished her any way she wanted to, Ronda was done after the punches she took in the first round and her not having the stamina anywhere near comparable to that of a boxer such as Holms (who is actually older than her).

As I said, she did Kickboxing/MMA for 5 years and she beat one of the best fighters in the UFC, this would not happen the other way round even if you gave an MMA guy a decade of training.

And if Holms has done it, I don't see why anybody else can't. Klitschko with 5 years of MMA training probably beats Cain with ease like Holms did Rousey.

 

Lol. That was one sneaky golfer.