Roy Jones agrees w Hop about Kessler

Look on the bright side. With all the dirt thrown at Kessler in this thread he might eventually land a fight. It's exactly what his carreer needs. People trying to belittle him is water on his mill. Keep it comin'.
So far it looks as if few wants to fight him. I wonder why?:good

 

Hope you don't mind me asking but where are you from? Why all the euro-hate?

 

Seriously Tyson86. Come on. You give one example. It hardly makes a case. You're smarter than that!!!

 

I am dead serius about Kessler, he makes it looks so easy, therefore they call him robotic, boxing is about making it easy, and Kessler does!
wait and see:yep

 

Please don´t tell me your wasting money on Hopkins tonight? Give them to charity instead! No need to feeding the bookies!

I am still shocked that people are so blinded by hopkins merits, that they can see the obvious of today: The Hopkins of today lose 10 times out of 10 to Calzaghe!

 

Promise?! It'll be quite a lot you know!

 

Not forgetting all the humble pie he needs to choke down, while making a new alias.

 

There won't be enough aliass if he continues.

 

Why in your opinion is 168 the second weakest next to 154? Do you see nothing in Calzaghe, Kessler, Andrade, Mundine, Bute, Froch, Miranda, Bika etc at all?Why, for example, is 160 so much better? Why is heavyweight considered better in your opinion? I'm sure we can all see GLARING flaws in lots of fighters. Pavlik's picture is next to 'flaws' in the dictionary, but I think people can see that what he does is effective, even if there are weaknesses.

I'm fairly certain it is purely a nationality thing with you, which is a shame...

 

DanePuglist, are you seriously telling me that Calzaghe is more pleaseing to the eye than Mayweather!...why donät you come clean and admit you are looking at the bigger picture in regards to Kessler!

 

Pavlik would be taken apart and KO'd by Kessler. Kessler is better in almost every aspect of boxing, only Pavliks workrate and power are better. But Kessler hits harder than Taylor and hard enough to KO Pavlik, and he is more accurate with his punches, far more compact and fluid when attacking, has better hand speed, a better chin and a better defence.

I love the way you clowns say he is overrated and yet rave about Pavlik based on two fights opponents he has beaten and ignore how close he came to losing to one of those inside 2 rounds.

 

Speaking of overated, Hatton is overated by you my overly zealous patriotic CLOWN

 

He was not close to being KO'd and no he does not hit especially hard but nor does Taylor and Taylor nearly had Pavlik out. Kessler would land easier and more often than Taylor because he has a better repertoire of punches.

You talk about Kessler being upright and so on, which technical aspect of Pavliks boxing is better? Name one.

Are you ignoring or unable to actually see how wide Pavlik is when he attacks and how slow his hands are? Do you think he has good footwork? Do you think he is not wide open to counters?

Seriously what does he do from a technical view that is better than Kessler?

 

In what sense? I predicted that PBF would stop him in the late rounds. Search my posts and you will see sure enough that I said "I would love Hatton to win but it will be a PBF victory by either wide UD or most likely a late TKO".

I have also said that Cotto would stop Hatton. Other than that I pick Hatton to beat the rest of the 140 crowd and several of the 147 crowd, and say that he is a top level fighter but not total elite such as PBF and Cotto.

How exactly is that being zealously patriotic?

I am about as objective as it gets, unlike you idiots who all pick your man to win based on either his nationality or skin colour.

Oh and I have also said that prime RJJ would rip Calzaghe to bits. So don't try and taint me with your brush you mug.

 

I said something Kessler cannot do or he is better at. Kessler throws hooks and uppercuts with better disguise and faster than Pavlik.