Roy Jones and Mike Tyson, where should we really place them?

Bernard had nothing to gain but roy kept begging him and bernard tried to hype it as erasing that loss and all that **** in the end it didnt matter cause it was a shell of an old roy jones.

 

if he was wiatin for roy to fall like u so claim hed of went after him right after he was knocked out by Tarver and glen johnson Bernard had no interest in Roy so that was more bull**** from u there.

 

One last thing before i go here. U guys constantly talk about leverage o well roy had win over ihm back in 93. But u know what Hopkins has dominating victorys over the two men that knocked him out. Pzout u can cry yourselves to sleep to your bodyheadsoundtracks tonight.

 

Fine what ever Jones begged him ..Hopkins didn't have to take that fight but he did for his own personal ego ..It spoke volumes imo of his desire to really challenge Jones when it meant something .They are still legends who ranks higher will always be argued ...I think Jones got enough attention time to give it to Tyson

 

Lol oh yes lets now bring on the tyson homers.

 

Roy has two dominant wins over prime ATG's, Toney and Hopkins.

How many fighters have not just beaten but dominated two prime ATG's?

Plus knocking out Hill with one punch, blowing out Griffin in the rematch in one round, toying with Hall...how many LHW's could have done all three? Not beating these three fighters, but beating them in such dominating fashion?

I would favor noone in history over Roy at 168 and very few, if any at 175. Tyson wasn't could be reasonably expected to be beaten by a number of HW's in history. Roy and Tyson are on different levels.