I'm great at many things. You're only great at riding Roy's ****. It never fails whenever theres a thread about Roy you're there to ride his ****. :rofl:rofl
Again, hurling insults around is just a defence mechanism. It's an ignorant person's default setting. You've got nothing else to say. You've entered this debate, and you've been challenged. It appears to me that you've got three options: 1. Predictably hurl around some more insults. 2. Leave the thread. 3. Have an actual debate. Which one's it going to be? If it's going to be no. 1, you're just going to embarrass yourself further. Now how hard can it be, to have an actual debate and try and back up your points? Can you reply to the two links I've sent you? :good
You're a nutthugger. I already said i dont debate with nutthuggers. I dont want to be your friend. I dont want anything to do with you. You're a loser plain and simple, you dont even follow boxing you just follow Roy jones. I'm gonna keep saying what i think about your man love and you either deal with it or dont i dont give a **** either way.:hi:
You're comments have been challenged in a debate, and you simply have no answer. Any small kid with Internet access can insult me like you can. Again, it's just a default setting because you've nothing else to add. Roy didn't avoid a Hopkins rematch. If you're going to criticise Roy, at least get your facts right.
Young Terror, 1. I've just proven that Roy didn't duck a Hopkins rematch. Just how ignorant are you? I posted you TWO links. And the only reply you could muster was a bunch of insults. Yet here you are claiming the exact same thing. Why!? atsch Here you go again: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/boxing/stories/2002-07-10-jones-hopkins.htm http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Benz/Benz_1112a08.htm 2. Roy was on his way to stopping Griffin before he foolishly lost his head. It was a deserved disqualification. But he then iced him in a single round before Dariusz fought him. 3. McCallum didn't have Roy shook, but I agree that a younger MW version of Mike may have beaten Roy. Mike was a great fighter in his prime. 4. Eric Lucas wasn't a D level fighter. If he was, hardly any fighter would hold wins over elite/A level guys. 5. Roy didn't fail to stop guys like Gonzalez. He was in cruise control. He was more than happy for fights to go the distance unless a knockout opportunity presented itself. The only guy that Roy really went after hard, was Griffin in the rematch. 6. He won the first Tarver fight fair and square and he fought him another two times, despite being labelled reluctant. He also went into the rubber match straight after the Johnson loss without a tune up, after being out of action for more than a year. 7. John Ruiz wasn't cherry picked. Roy tried on two occasions to fight Evander Holyfield, the first of which was in 1998, which was confirmed by Evander's attorney Jim Thomas. 8. Joe Calzaghe was a scavenger. Just like Bernard, he told the media that he wanted nothing to do with Roy because he was shot. Yet just like Bernard, he then went on to fight him. Regarding everything else you've wrote, I pretty much agree with it.
I don't the like word ducked, because it always gets thrown around too easy. But Jim Thomas who was Evander's attorney, stated that in 1998, Evander turned down Roy's proposal, because at the time, he felt as though he was in a no win situation. And I get that. You have to look at things from everyone's perspective. But it proves that Roy wasn't reluctant and was only content to fight the Frazier's and Kelly's of the world. (no disrespect to those guys)
No, he shouldn't. I had no positive opinion regarding Glowacki as of a week ago but just based on that result he is levels above what Jones should be stepping in with nowadays.
You can't debate with him. He doesn't know how to. You'll only receive insults as a response. He's a terrible poster. One of the worst on the forum.