It was weak.... Tarver and Johnson brutally stopped Jones. Johnson was a failed 160 and 168 fighter.... Tarver couldn't cut it against Dawson, the same Dawson who couldn't cut it against today's champions. The rest where nothing to write home about and certainly no better than 168 at the time. You're anti Calzaghe thread is too transparent.
What are you talking about you fool? Roy was stopped in 2004. What about the other 5 years he was there, genius? How on earth is this an anti Calzaghe thread? I posted this article 2 years ago, as at the time, a few members were asking for in-depth information of Roy's career, especially the early stages that he shared with his father. It had absolutely NOTHING whatsoever to do with Joe Calzaghe.
175 was weak, at the time one of the most mundane divisions. At the time it was as weak or worse than 168.
Why does it bother you so much LouDumb?? I just thought it was a good topic to bump! No harm right? Why are you getting so touchy about it sport?! Anyway your hero Jones is very, very overrated here by people like you. I mean he was a good fighter.. don’t get me wrong. But eventually we found out he wasn’t as unstoppable as many made him out to be
Sickening??! Wow! Well here you were just a couple of days ago telling me my posts were “Entertaining” more than anything! If I’d have known I was making you sick I’d have eased up on you sweetheart! Try to be more honest and not so fake. GGG > Jones at 160
It’s funny the way he likes to say “Oh I’m a FAN of Joe’s!” then turns around and argues the significance of Calzaghe’s resume with the ignorance and sass of a bitter, angry and senile old lady.
How on earth was it as weak/weaker than SMW? Roy's LHW reign was 1996-2003: http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1996 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1997 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1998 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_1999 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2000 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2001 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2002 http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2003
It doesn't bother me at all. It's absolutely hilarious. Instead of me embarrassing you, you've done it all by yourself. Yet again, you've provided us all with some great entertainment. For the 3rd time in just 24 hours, you've made a complete fool of yourself. Who knows where we'll be by Monday. I'm still awaiting these details of your supposed ploy from the other thread. You said that you knew that I'd agree with Bailey, you knew what trap he was setting, and you were in fact just liking the fact that he was laying the trap. Haha! NOBODY BELIEVES YOU! Me and Bailey NEVER AGREE on anything. What happened was very simple: (just like you) You liked his post WITHOUT having read the content. Just like when you insulted me for a prediction that I never made, because again: You HADN'T read the content. You CANNOT read. Your objective is simply to agree with anybody who either criticises or disagrees with anything that I write. You are so out of your depth on every topic, it makes me cringe when I see you struggle. But by all means, let it continue. I used to feel guilty when I ripped you. I often feel pity. But seeing as though you've brought it on by yourself, I have no more sympathy. If you want to carry on with this then keep posting. The only outcome, will be that I'll absolutely embarrass you. And I won't even have to use factual information to do it. Because you possess such a low level of intellect, I can just use what you've written in your own posts and turn it against you. By the end of the year, you and your little cheerleaders will need counselling.
Once again: YOU HAVEN'T READ THE CONTENT PROPERLY. I wasn't talking about you. That's now the FORTH time in 24 hours that you have misread something. You are an absolute embarrassment. I don't even need to do anything. You do all the hard work for me.
Dummy... you said it was “sickening” in regards to what that idiot said about Kevin liking my posts. Now you’re going to try and worm your way out of it!! Lol!! If I or my posts didn’t bother you... you wouldn’t be sickened by Kevin ‘liking’ what I say. You’re dumber than a bag of rocks with these attempts. Anyway.... who did your hero Jones beat to prove his “Toughness” in the same manner as GGG has?? And why do I bring up GGG? Because you like to downplay his accomplishments
“I never even mentioned Joe.” You’ve mentioned him a thousand times on here. You really are weird dude. And I wasn’t talking to you in that post
Oh my. Your embarrassing posts entertain me. I said that it was sickening more than cute, in regards to the way that Kevin immediately likes every single post of yours no matter what you write. Not just in response to me, but in general. He's your chief cheerleader. Is that really too complex for you to figure out?