Roy Jones Jr vs Jim Jeffries

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Feb 7, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,089
    Mar 21, 2007
    They wouldn't be fighting under alien circumstances with their best range basically taken from them.
     
  2. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    lets put it this way, if the fight were under jeffries rules then i would not hesitate to pick him to stop jones, but they are not. and speed isnt everything but it is a whole lot and without the wrestling and the bigger gloves jeffries isnt used to, i can see jones easily outspeeding him and adding up the points. jeffries was very good for HIS time, jones is as good as it gets in this time.
     
  3. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    :good
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,247
    Feb 15, 2006
    Holyfield and Haye were faster but lets not forgett that they were smaller fighters who bulked up to be the same size as Jeffries.

    I don't think you would find that many guys who were 220lbs pre 1980 who were faster on their feet than Jeffries.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,127
    25,303
    Jan 3, 2007
    Not sure that I would pick Jeffries to take this one regardless of his size and superior strength... An aging Bob Fitzsimmons who was no bigger than Jones and arguably less technically and athletically gifted, really gave Jeffries Hell.. Joe Choynski, a middleweight sized fighter, broke his nose, and Tom Sharkey fought him to a draw.. Jones was a well proven lightheavyweight who was as big or bigger than many of Jeffries' best opponents, and was by far a faster man than any he ever met. His punches had a fair amount of sting to them as well.. Jeffries would get hit hard and often, while probably being frustrated for most of the evening.... In a 20 round fight, Jeff might stop him late, but a wide decision or even a late round TKO for Jones is probably the more likely outcome..
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,247
    Feb 15, 2006
    I agree that Jones could probably go 15, but the last three rounds are called the championship rounds for a reason.

    Jones is going to have to survive for three more rounds as you say, and fifteen rounds is noit going to be completely alien to Jeffries. He fought over this distance early in his career (Griffin & Goddard).
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,089
    Mar 21, 2007
    Jones is one of the few fighters of the 12 round era that I give a full pass to over 15 rounds. I'm genuinely a "you never know" type of guy, but he was an incredible athlete. I also suspect that we only ever saw him in his absolute top gear but once...though that's more than we've seen Jeffries in his, it should be pointed out. I bet that would put the shits up most fighters, seeing that...and maybe, in the final analysis, that's the bottom line. Jones would know better than to get into the ring with Jeffries, whereas Jeffries would get into the ring with one of the most lethal fighters in history up until that point after being retired five years.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    Look at footage of him sparring for Ruhlin ,and then look at him fighting Ruhlin.
    Chalk and cheese, in fact Ruhlin looks quicker on his feet.
    I keep saying this, but there is no footage of Jeffries fighting that shows him to be quick on his feet.
    Sparring with an inferior man , may flatter a boxer , but it is NOT actual fighting.
    I actually favour Jeffries to win this fight late ,but I feel rose coloured glasses are being applied here.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,247
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that Jeffries used his footspeed tacticaly.

    He generaly ploded, as was apropriate in fights of such duration, but then when he saw an oportunity he would spring forward and close the distance.

    That is the impresion I get from contemporary acounts.

    If we had footage of him in some of his shorter fights we would see him being more agresive in pressing the fight.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    With respect that is opinion ,not fact.

    I am aware boxers fought at a pace appropriate to the distance the fight was scheduled for ,

    I am also aware that nowhere is there any footage to support claims that Jeffries was quick on his feet in actual fights.arguments to the contrary are supposition.

    The Ruhlin fight shows Jeffries three stepping his way forward left glove below his waist ,chin tucked close into his chest and shoulder, right hand cocked,it is possible that a fighter with the hand speed of Jones ,a man ackowledged as a fantastic pot shotter might be able to land with impunity on Jeffries face with quick right hands.

    I highly doubt he would be able to get Jeffries in distress at any time, though he may well be able to inflict a substantial amount of facial damage.

    What happens if and when Jeffries begins to land heavy artillery is the $64000 question ?
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,247
    Feb 15, 2006
    There is no footage to suport claims that there was colour in Jeffries era but we can infer it from contemporary acounts.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    That is not an argument, it is sarcasm, and pretty weak sarcasm at that.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    Two past prime inactive veterans Corbett and Fitz had no difficulty deciding when to let their hands go against a crouching Jeffries
    .Anyone think they had handpseed anywhere comparable to Jones?
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,247
    Feb 15, 2006
    My point (perhaps clumsily made) is that there are always some things that we have to take on faith from the contemporary acounts.

    The sample of footage we have is so samll and of such poor quality that it has to be used in conjunction with other sources.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,628
    46,263
    Feb 11, 2005
    So let me understand... Jeffries goes life and death with Tom Sharkey, a guy who wouldn't make it 4 rounds with Jones, Jr., but Jeffries beats Roy.

    I tend to think Jeffries was and remains very overrated.