Roy Jones v Thomas Hearns @ 160

Jones KO (mid rounds)

For the aforementioned reasons

 

He's a drug patient. Certainly going by his post you quoted.

 

Nice alt your have here pea. Hes either an alt or your personal nut-hugger. one of the two.

 

Why, because he's a reasonable poster? In case you haven't noticed, you're the only one in this thread who believes Hearns would win. Not only that, but you rely on citing false information as your primary sources, and you don't even cite that information correctly(such as you saying Toney had 2 weeks to cut from 214, when even the biased article said 6 weeks).

Anyone looking in on this argument from a neutral point of view can see how much of an ass you're making of yourself.

 

What makes him a reasonable poster? The fact that he called me a drug patient? Michael Buffer himself said that Toney weighed in at 214 weeks before the fight. It was on ESPN classic when they replayed the Jones/Toney fight.

Read this article. I may have gotten that one mixed up with another one.

http://www.boxing-memorabilia.com/toney.htm

 

Why would I want to be his nuthugger? I consider myself a decent poster. Watch my posts in the future and you'll see my opinions seldom get laughed at from others. Because my views are sensibly constructed with a bit of knowledge behind them. Your's on the otherhand aren't.

 

You questioned me being a reasonable poster based on one post huh.


Stupid.

 

That article is just a continuation of the other one you posted. It says nothing about Jones continuously post-poning anything. And again, it's unbelievably biased towards Toney, these kinds of things are best taken with a grain of salt.

And what the **** does Michael Buffer, the announcer, know about Toney's troubles making weight? Also, when did he say this?

 

The only thing i see you doing on this site is following behind sweet pea in every thread and supporting him. The first day i came to this site you were doing it as well. You have to be either his alt or just plain weird.

 

Come to think of it, it wasn't on ESPN, it was on channel Versus.They were doing a replay of Jones/Toney and he said that Toney weighed in at 214 LBS TWO weeks before the fight. The article says six but i don't know if its too accurate. Im trying to find that same exact article that i came across when i read that Jones postponed the fight continously.

 

weighing 214 lbs TWO weeks before fighting at 168? bull****ing****. Impossible.

oh the myth of toney being that heavy continues.:!:

 

Nope. Far from the truth. I have been a regular on the classic section longer than Sweet Pea. For you to say "the only thing i see you doing on this site is following behind sweet pea in every thread" is just wishful thinking on you're behalf. Myself and Sweet Pea happen to be friends, so friends usually follow each other around from time to time. But it's not the only thing I do on the site, your head is miles away from reality with such a statement.

 

Wow, you have just exposed youself as being a follower. You follow Pete around from time to time? lol. Question, who follow's people online in threads all of the time? Thats bordline stalking if you ask me. I should call the both of you team

This content is protected

since yall are joined together like that. Hes sweet and your name is Robbie.:rofl

 

Following, meaning I shall follow up on some of his posts and respond; quote him. Not always agreeing with him though. Brooklyn does the same with myself often as well, same with Sweet Pea. If you see a problem with that, you're exposing yourself as childish.

 

I just find it okward for posters to follow each other in threads, its simply not normal. I would understand it if you were discussing or having a debate about the topic, but to just come in a thread and automatically defend him is plain weird. You didn't even give your view on the subject of the thread either. I also remember you popping up in the Whitaker/Mayweather thread as well and defend him. You, ''Brooklyn'' and Sweetie has problems man. :fight