Roy Jones vs. Ezzard Charles , 15rds@175

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by frankenfrank, Dec 7, 2009.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,987
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, and more than one ringsider who saw both apparently agreed.

    All very true. Weighing experience versus size is very difficult though. I wish, wish we had some glimmers of film of Charles-Burley. I know that's a useless thing to say, but they might be the greatest pair of wins in fight-history speaking relatively.
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    I agree with Duodenum on this..in fact that Moore ko of Charles was the first thing that came to mind. Ruggedness plays a part in this as well...Jones, for instance, would have NEVER been able to gut it out and take it for 15 rounds against Marciano like Charles did, and I think everybody knows that too.
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Charles successfully outboxed Walcott twice who himself was a tricky unorthodox counter puncher with fantastic reflexes and freakish hand speed. While Roy Jones is one of a kind as Jersey Joe was, Charles isn't exactly inexperienced at dealing with unusual boxers of that substance. Ezzard will adapt as he always does and find a home for his short left, putting Jones to sleep in the Championship rounds.
     
  4. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    (1) jones also showed power against an unprepaired griffin in their second fight. (not only against hill) and to some extent also against reggie johnson , mike mccallum , tony thornton , vinny pazienza , merqui sosa and thulani malinga and these are just a part of his fights that i saw.
    (2) many of roy jones' opponents were no slouches : griffin , thornton , pazienza , reggie johnson , i don't even check his record again for that matter
    (3) charley burley had neither jones' power nor his size and i bet that also not his speed
    (4) a prime roy jones had a good chin.
     
  5. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    712
    May 22, 2007
    You cannot compare the opposition they fought Charles fought far better fighters it’s a simple fact. The biggest difference between the two isn't speed it’s in fighting. Roy in fighting ability was non existence he just used to lay on the ropes while Charles was an excellent in fighter with powerful body shots like the one he stopped Marshall with. Also Ezzard has the better jab and power, I see him eventually getting Roy's timing and stopping him in the championship rounds.
     
  6. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
    yep
     
  7. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
    What version would turn up though? The aggressive version before the Baroudi incident or the more cautious, boxer 1st version that came after. Jones indeed began to fall in love with himself as he moved up in weight and became more flat footed. As the rounds would begin to go by Charles feinting would have taken their affect and Jones would eventually get caught.

    Charles in the 11th.
     
  8. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    I specifically mentioned Charles KO 8 Moore in part because that was Ezzard's last match before the Baroudi tragedy. Ezz was both at his cagiest and most ruthless for that one.