Roy Jones vs James Jeffries

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Dec 3, 2011.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Corbett was 33 for the fight. Hardly shot. His handlers said it was his best ring effort. Corbett was very hard to catch cleanly, bigger, stronger, more durable and almost as fast as Jones.



    Jeffries was washed up, and lost his stamina when he meet Johnson in 1910. In his prime he was a puncher who produced a knockdown in all of his fights, save his lame comeback effort at 35 with no warm up fights. Jeffries hit at least as hard ( I would say much harder ) than Tarver who produced a one shot KO on glass Roy, and G. Johnson who had Jones out for over a minutes. Jones was a thin boned man, who simply could not take it.
     
  2. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    co-sign. the difference in skill based on available film is astronomical. the argument for jeffries boils down to "times were tough, so jeffries was tough and jones wasn't. jeffries wins" which is about as logical as "jones wins because of his superior blackness"
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Corbett hadn't won a fight in five frigging years. The talent pool was also tiny then compared to now. The world population was 1 billion and there wasn't such a thing as either an amateur career or a professional career. Nor was there as much mobility as there is now, which is a further drain on the already tiny talent pool.

    Having said that, if the fight is scheduled for 25 rounds with tiny gloves and a sadistic referee, then Jeffries has a chance of out-lasting Jones. I wouldn't be too certain though; an old Fitz and Sharkey apparently beat the **** out of big Jim.

    On the other hand, if Jones had KO'd a fat journeyman like Ed Dunkhorst then people here would probably give him a chance.
     
  4. darling dame

    darling dame Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    3
    Dec 8, 2009
    I think at this point Jeff still had it Ko later rounds!!!!:yep
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    12 or over I take james.
     
  6. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    not until the 25th round do i think jones slows enough for jeffries bear paws to reach
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,637
    27,341
    Feb 15, 2006
    Reading peoples responses here it quickly becomes apparent that a lot of people don't even have any idea what sort of fighter Jeffries was.
     
  8. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    advanced slowly, behind a low low crouch. his left hand extended to block and parry any punches coming his way. his right hand attached to his face, ready to be unleashed when close enough

    very athletic for his time, didn't use speed but instead ridiculous endurance and physical strength. got in, ground down his opponent. terrific right hand and body punching.

    i pick him to beat ron lyle

    i don't see those skills translating to beat jones unless it's more than 15 rounds or non-modern day rules
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,637
    27,341
    Feb 15, 2006
    You have about half the picture here.

    Jeffries became a lot more agresive later in his career, and he was prety fast on his feet himself. Impresions of his style are skewed by the Johnson fight, where he seems to have reverted to the reactive style that he used earlier in his title reign.

    Jeffries seems to have been reactive in the first Fitzsimmons and first Corbett fight. He became more agresive around the time of the Ruhlin fight, and polished up his game a lot after the second Fitzsimmons fight.

    Certainly if he was at his peak, and he knew that he had twelve rounds to catch Jones, he would not be advancing slowly behind a low crouch. Jeffries was a murderous body puncher and this would be the key to him winning the fight.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,231
    47,242
    Feb 11, 2005
    Good points. The best of Jeff wasn't seen until just before his first retirement. He was green as can be when he started and pretty quickly fed to the wolves.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,233
    48,536
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah Jeffries was pretty fast and even dynamic for his time and his size, but whether or not he was anything like fast enough to catch up to Jones is another matter. Fast, fast middleweights look slow with Jones.

    If Jeffreis won this fight it would be with his chin, not his feet.
     
  12. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    thanks jan :good at least i was half right :smoke the clarification is helpful and paints a different picture from the standard, even if not in style than in quality and growth as a fighter. however, the added aggression and activity would be an advantage against jones.

    given jones own style, athleticism and skills i still think jeffries at a disadvantage in this one. over 12 or 15 i see jones playing careful, sharpshooting matador. gets trickier with more rounds and different rule sets but in modern times, modern rules i favour jones
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,637
    27,341
    Feb 15, 2006
    You will never get Jones to take the fight anyway.

    He will get tempted down to the newly created light heavyweight division to fight Jack Root or George Gardiner.
     
  14. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Like Jeffries would've defended his title against the subhuman
     
  15. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    That's about it.