Roy Jones Vs today's best fighters, across 6 divisions.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Loudon, Jun 16, 2013.


  1. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,678
    4,208
    Feb 20, 2008
    Jones won trinket belts in every weight class. Sorry.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,382
    Mar 7, 2012
    Why was that?

    Was it because Roy was scared?

    Or was it because there were other CIRCUMSTANCES involved?
     
  3. pecho26

    pecho26 ESB Lurker Full Member

    2,334
    16
    Nov 19, 2010
    Your opinion only.Sorry
    And some brits and alts as well.
    I dont know what do you find as attractive fights as well :lol: decapitations?mutilations?bukkake parties?
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,382
    Mar 7, 2012
    :lol:
     
  5. Eric cantona

    Eric cantona Active Member Full Member

    563
    1
    Jun 17, 2013
    This is true.
    The real question is weather he would have won any belts without the peds
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,382
    Mar 7, 2012
    What were the circumstances?

    Roy passed 3 random tests after the Hall fight.

    All the haters say he wouldn't have been stupid enough to carry on taking them after.

    Are you one of those guys?

    That was 2000.

    Three years later he won the WBA HW title, and then went back to 175 to reclaim his old belts.

    On the way, he beat Harding and Gonzalez, and then toyed with Woods.

    If there's any steroids out there which can make you leap in and out of range in the blink of an eye, and throw lightning combinations to the body and the head, then let me know where you can buy some. :good
     
  7. pecho26

    pecho26 ESB Lurker Full Member

    2,334
    16
    Nov 19, 2010
    Another alt created for this threads.:rofl:lol::patsch
    Go back under the stone you crawled out.
     
  8. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,574
    Nov 27, 2010
    Loudon - normally agree with a lot of what you say, but I think there's some issues with this viewpoint.

    Passing random tests is essentially meaningless. Confirmed dopers in sports with far more rigourous testing than boxing have gone through dozens of tests without slipping up.

    There are also numerous examples of athletes failing multiple tests. It may deter some individuals, but it's essentially the same as any kind of punishment. Some people never reoffend, whereas others just become more careful about getting caught.

    Roy got virtually no punishment for the violation, and it was essentially brushed under the carpet. It was hardly a life-changing Dwain Chambers moment where his whole world came crashing down and he was villified within the sport. No-one really give a **** to be honest. There was really no deterrent to compromise his earnings potential by fighting clean.

    Roy's muscle gain for the Ruiz is highly suspicious. Yes, it is within the realms of possibility that he was able to do that naturally, but Jones doesn't deserve any benefit of the doubt given his past history. You have an example of someone who previously tested positive for steroids, who at the age of 34 significantly increases his muscle mass in a short space of time without any noticeable drop off in speed. Generally, in sport if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and makes very loud quacking noises, you can safely assume we have a small aquatic bird of the of the family anatidae on our hands.

    Agreed. Roy was a supreme talent with or without chemical assistance, and it's likely that a significant number of his peers who never tested positive were doing the same things anyway.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,382
    Mar 7, 2012
    Momus,

    Hi mate,

    I can see where your coming from here.

    But the general consensus on here, is that Roy wouldn't have been dumb enough to continue after Hall.

    But then when you ask - "Ok, if he was that dependent on steroids, how did he easily beat Gonzalez and Woods, and was he able to beat Harding, Ruiz and Tarver?"

    They answer with - "Those guys weren't great fighters, so he didn't need them."

    Well, he hired Mackie Shilstone who is a highly respected sports psychologist and a strength and conditioning coach. Mackie took Spinks up to heavy, and has worked with many fighters and football players over the years.

    I've never heard even a whisper that he's been involved with any sort of PEDS.
     
  10. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,574
    Nov 27, 2010
    Shilstone is also famous for working with Serena Williams. Yup, Serena "built like a NFL Linebacker" Williams, aka Serena "lock herself in a room and call 911 when doping control show up for out of competition test" Williams :lol:

    I have no idea if Mackie is involved in PEDs, but if you judge the character of a man by the company he keeps, I wouldn't be betting the house against that possibility.

    Everything you've said raises suspicion if anything - using a specialist S+C guy who was instrumental in transforming Spinks from a skinny LHW to the heavyweight champ and has worked with athletes in sports where doping is common.

    He may well be highly respected. He may well be highly knowledgeable. He may well be highly, um, good at getting results. It doesn't mean he is above suspicion, and his involvement doesn't do anything to remove question marks around how Roy "prepared" for the Ruiz fight.


    I tend not to give any elite athlete the benefit of the doubt unless they are completely open and transparent, and take meaningful action to clean up their sport beyond simple lip service. If it really was a case of doping being rare, the clean majority would be actually doing something about it, rather than shrugging their shoulders and scratching their arse. I know that other people are less cynical, which is all good. Each to their own :cool:

    Anyway, whatever the truth behind Roy and PEDs I don't think it tarnishes his legacy. The only ones who suggest that are either highly principled salt-of-the-earthers, trolls looking to get a reaction, or people oblivious to the fact that PED use in boxing is not just restricted to a few high profile America-based fighters. Take your pick.
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,382
    Mar 7, 2012
    What you wrote about Serena Williams made me laugh out loud ha! That was so funny! :lol:

    To be fair though, Mackie only worked with her for a short while sometime around 2008, after she'd been injured.

    I don't know when the allegations came to light, but I think it was quite recently.

    I've no issue with you being suspicious of Mackie, but I also think it's a little unfair to imply that he's dirty. The NFL is notorious for PEDS, but it doesn't mean that Mackie's in the thick of it. He's also worked with Baseball players too, and I've read a lot about him, especially since Roy worked with him, and I've never heard a thing.

    There's an article somewhere where he breaks down the exact details of Roy's camp, talking about his body fat percentages etc. I haven't seen for a while though.

    With regards to Spinks, you may find the following article interesting.

    Unfortunately, we can no longer post links on here for some reason.

    But it's easy to find.

    If you just type into Google - Michael Spinks beat Larry Holmes thanks to a training regimen, you'll see an old article from Sports Illustrated from 1985.

    It's a really good read, if you've got a spare 5-10 mins.

    Thanks for the reply. :good
     
  12. Eric cantona

    Eric cantona Active Member Full Member

    563
    1
    Jun 17, 2013
    ??no they gave him extra strength and stamina
     
  13. Eric cantona

    Eric cantona Active Member Full Member

    563
    1
    Jun 17, 2013
    Another yank claiming they all take peds.
    Look at other sports, it usually the yanks doing the cheating
     
  14. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,574
    Nov 27, 2010
    Cheers - I'll have a look when I get the chance.

    I wasn't intending to imply that Mackie that was dirty, and to be fair I could have worded that bit better. I was more getting at that to me the burden of proof rests with people to prove that they are clean, rather than the other way round. Some people think that's a bit of a ****ed up viewpoint, and it's probably from spending too much time around MMA fighters and watching cycling and athletics for years. To me there are a lot of parallels between boxing now and how the sports perceived to be dope-infested were in the 80s and 90s. The culture of denial and omerta has been prevalent in boxing for years, although the tide seems to be turning a bit in the last few years.
     
  15. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,574
    Nov 27, 2010
    Quite right chief, especially about the yank bit. Thanks for setting me straight.

    There isn't a single British fighter to get busted for drugs. Apart from that Larry Olubamiwo chap. Oh, and Terry Dunstan. And Tony Dodson. And Dillan Whyte. And Craig Windsor. And some others :think

    The yanks and those greasy Spaniards are the worst for cheating I think. It shows you how awesome the Brits are when they can go from 1 Olympic gold medal to 29 in the space of 16 years when the rest of the world is cheating like *******s. There's a lot to be said for a bit of lottery cash and "marginal gains" :deal