- The IBF already said at the time that Roy and Hall both tested positive for Andro. - There was No second test because Roy admitted that Andro he tested positive was from Ripped Fuel supplement
Like said before they IBF considered Andro anabolic steroids even though nobody else did and despite the fact that Andro was legal.
Exactly. They are all keyboard warriors. I can tell for a fact non of them have ever stepped in the ring. They would never have guts to say what they say face to face.
So the second test never happened right ? Also wasnt it supposed to be nasal spray before it was ripped fuel ?
That was on Eastside boxing........Front page. I didn't say Larry was wrong. That is what Dm's people told him before the fight. It was a Universum bluff to get on HBO that night. They got called on it right after. That's like saying Larry was wrong when he said Mike tyson was the best heavyweight in the world in 1988. And then pulling it up now saying se he's wrong Wlad is the best heavyweight. And you childish attempts at semantic traps don't work with the intelligent. Keith
Right before his next fight. The IBF accepted that as his second test because they accepted that ripped fuel could cause the false positive. Keith
They didn't need to do a second test because Roy already admitted to the first. Roy and the commissioner agreed Roy would submit drug tests for his next 2 fights. The commissioner said the Nasal spray was an inaccuracy on a website he saw.
the proof is they didn't strip, admonish or penalize him in any way. They OBVIOUSLY accepted the reasoning, especially since Hall tested way out of range too. (Funny how you guys just ignore that fact). You do understand context and circumstance, right?? Keith
That's not a "second test" atsch Stop spinning , that's another test for another fight months later, you need to admit that you are wrong on that one. It would be good for you.
You are being pedantic. The IBF said they would take the test before the next fight as their second test. Now however you want to move that to fit your agenda is your issue, but to the IBF, that was the second test. Again, why was JOnes not even ADMONISHED if the IBF really thought there was something afoot. Keith
These fools always ignore this ...Jones' levels were 6x tthe legal limit while Hall's was 10 x's ! I mean what does all this really prove ? Oh I know that no amount of PED can MAKE YOU BOX BETTER ! If that were the case Hall would have had the upset of the year when he fought Jones !
Besides, how good is it for you trying to hash up and fabricate history from 10 years ago because a fighter you didn't like dominated the sport. It's kind of pathetic........Makes you seem like a conspiracy weirdo..... Keith
Look at the quote please: Thats where it ended with the IBF, subsequent tests went to Indiana. NOT the IBF Also are you seriously trying to say that a boxer got doping can do a "second test" 4 months later and you think thats acceptable for a different fight 4 months prior ? There would never be positive tests in that case You have it all wrong, also do you have a quote for this imaginary "IBF 2nd test", because it seems to me that you are making this up.