Roy Jones was NEVER a Steroids cheat

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ajackman1, Jul 31, 2012.


  1. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    - The IBF already said at the time that Roy and Hall both tested positive for Andro.

    - There was No second test because Roy admitted that Andro he tested positive was from Ripped Fuel supplement
     
  2. He's a disgraceful hypocrite. This place is full to the brim with them. :-(
     
  3. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    Like said before they IBF considered Andro anabolic steroids even though nobody else did and despite the fact that Andro was legal.
     
  4. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    Exactly. They are all keyboard warriors. I can tell for a fact non of them have ever stepped in the ring. They would never have guts to say what they say face to face.
     
  5. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    So the second test never happened right ?

    Also wasnt it supposed to be nasal spray before it was ripped fuel ?
     
  6. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    :lol::lol: the Calslappy fanboys are a joke, just like Calslappy was.
     
  7. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    That was on Eastside boxing........Front page.

    I didn't say Larry was wrong. That is what Dm's people told him before the fight. It was a Universum bluff to get on HBO that night. They got called on it right after.


    That's like saying Larry was wrong when he said Mike tyson was the best heavyweight in the world in 1988. And then pulling it up now saying se he's wrong Wlad is the best heavyweight.

    And you childish attempts at semantic traps don't work with the intelligent.


    Keith
     
  8. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    Right before his next fight. The IBF accepted that as his second test because they accepted that ripped fuel could cause the false positive.

    Keith
     
  9. ajackman1

    ajackman1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,388
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    They didn't need to do a second test because Roy already admitted to the first. Roy and the commissioner agreed Roy would submit drug tests for his next 2 fights. The commissioner said the Nasal spray was an inaccuracy on a website he saw.
     
  10. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    the proof is they didn't strip, admonish or penalize him in any way.

    They OBVIOUSLY accepted the reasoning, especially since Hall tested way out of range too. (Funny how you guys just ignore that fact). You do understand context and circumstance, right??


    Keith
     
  11. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    That's not a "second test" :patsch

    Stop spinning , that's another test for another fight months later, you need to admit that you are wrong on that one. It would be good for you.
     
  12. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004

    You are being pedantic. The IBF said they would take the test before the next fight as their second test. Now however you want to move that to fit your agenda is your issue, but to the IBF, that was the second test.


    Again, why was JOnes not even ADMONISHED if the IBF really thought there was something afoot.


    Keith
     
  13. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    These fools always ignore this ...Jones' levels were 6x tthe legal limit while Hall's was 10 x's ! I mean what does all this really prove ? Oh I know that no amount of PED can MAKE YOU BOX BETTER ! If that were the case Hall would have had the upset of the year when he fought Jones !
     
  14. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    Besides, how good is it for you trying to hash up and fabricate history from 10 years ago because a fighter you didn't like dominated the sport. It's kind of pathetic........Makes you seem like a conspiracy weirdo.....



    Keith
     
  15. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Look at the quote please:


    Thats where it ended with the IBF, subsequent tests went to Indiana.
    NOT the IBF

    Also are you seriously trying to say that a boxer got doping can do a "second test" 4 months later and you think thats acceptable for a different fight 4 months prior ?

    There would never be positive tests in that case :lol:

    You have it all wrong, also do you have a quote for this imaginary "IBF 2nd test", because it seems to me that you are making this up.