What it tells me that the test was faulty. I have been involved with the administering of such tests for drugs and such. And when you get a crazy result like that, especially with multiple test subjects, the first inclination is to question the testing process and retest. Keith
For his next two fights he had to turn in test results to the IBF. What is with and semantics...?? Is that how you worm you way out of an argument you have no standing in??? Keith
Seems to me that you are getting mad because I am pointing out your errors and false assumptions. For the record I saw a thread entitled "Roy Jones was NEVER a Steroids cheat" and I joined in to discuss it, how is that pathetic because you are doing the exact same thing. Now I seem "weird" and "pathetic" and believe in "conspiracy"
His next 2 tests went to Indiana commision and anyway- that has no bearing on a fight 4 months prior. A second test or a B sample is done immediatley and you know this.
You have pointed out nothing. You have tried semantics to wiggle your point around. It all comes done to ONE thing. The IBF administered no punishment. Why would they not do that if they really that the test was reliable. Until you can answer this, you are making the assumption that you know the situation better them....... Keith
It's different because I am supporting the actual history of events, and you are trying to rewrite it. Ie, I can discuss the moon landing and the event that lead up to it from a historical point view. When you chime in that it is fake and never happened, you are the weirdo and conspiracist. Just like everything with you though......you are consistent...... Keith
Resulting to petty insults Keith I thought you were better than that. Please leave moon landings out of this. You are embarrassing yourself with that talk. When you can do that , please read this quote : This all comes from link posted.
I really believe thats why they couldn't pin point what either man took ..Tests were faulty .. Seems only the experts around here know for sure ..You know the ones
What insults???? So you are saying the IBF did not get those results also???? What that link shows me is that if the INdiana athletic commission also felt they did not have enough evidence to do anything either. So what was Jones punishment again??? I mean 6X the normal limit. Suspended a year, what happened again?? Keith
Yeah, why not?? I mean why take the second test from another fight?? Surely this roid cheat would be stripped and banned?? Both OF THEM. Which you keep ignoring. Keith
Keith you said I seem like a "conspiracy weirdo" for: "trying to hash up and fabricate history from 10 years ago because a fighter you didn't like dominated the sport" When I was just discussing the thread and quoting links that were posted here in favour of Jones and that was strange to you. There could be no punishment because it seems I have to consistantly quote the article: so the state can do nothing. The IBF chose to do nothing, they choose not to even do an immediate retest- something that would be done if they deemed it faulty- in your own experience. Why- no one really knows- and this why this discussion goes on. Could the IBF somehow be corrupt? Wasnt it old bribe taking Bobby Lee that was at the helm at this time? Didnt he go to jail for corruption ?