Roy Jones Whole Career Has Been Smoke And Mirrors

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rico Spadafora, Nov 10, 2008.


  1. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    Very well reasoned argument. Dude you should know better to post that here, ESPECIALLY on one of Rico's anti jones threads. Facts and logic are best left elsewhere.
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006

    It was both Roy and Hopkins' first title fight and Bernard's best win was against some guy whose claim to fame was winning the NABF light middleweight title. Roy at least had stopped a fighter who went the distance with James Toney 10 months earlier in 1 round. It was Bhop's 3rd title shot before he came back with it.

    Moral of the story- They were both green, but at least Roy had his amateur career and better comp up to that point to better prepare him for that fight. Hopkins had fought nobody, but got better after that by stepping up his level of comp to USBA level leading into the Mercado fights.
     
  3. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    The Hopkins argument is almost unwinnable though. His physical peak (let's say 97) came before his skill/competition peak.

    If you beat him when he was young, he was green.

    If you beat him when he was seasoned and established, he was too old.

    Jones has to get credit for the Hopkins win because of what he became afterward. Without that dominating performance (not impressive but yes, dominating from a points perspective) from Jones, who knows if Hopkins would have made adjustments and growns.

    Either way, it counts as maybe the only purely non controversial lose of his career (has anyone even seen his debut?)
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006

    I give Roy plenty of credit for the win, but I see exactly what you mean for the Hopkins conundrum. The way around that for me is to give the credit to whoever beat him regardless, because no matter if he was closer to being "green" or "past it", he's been a hell of a fighter for his career. Even if he was a little green, that's not an easy fight for Roy to have taken for his first title shot and he deserves the credit for winning it.

    What acknowledging the real experience level of both guys does, in the end, doesn't take away from Roy's win- it just shows how much of a travesty it was that we never saw the rematch. That was a big problem of that era- there were great fighters, but alot of great fights got left on the table.