Has there ever been a fighter that looked held on to as much athleticism as Roy Jones? I have never seen a 39 year old retain so much speed. Sure, he looks a little weaker, like he's on shakier legs, like his punch doesn't have as much heat on it; but he is still faster than most. I thought Bernard Hopkins was the king in this regard, but Roy has now joined him. As in to holding onto some youth, that is. Hopkins appears to have adapted to his declining physical abilities a bit better. Jones does not appear to try to beat his opponents with his skill set. Jones is still trying to out athlete the other guy. Jones still looks like he has enough game left to trouble the top fighters at 175. Jones is still faster than any cruiserweight, but he may be a little to brittle at this age to hang with the bigger guys. Jones may have been facing a blown up welterweight, but that welterweight looked as though he would still be a formidable foe at middleweight. This also puts an interesting twist on the Calzaghe vs. Hopkins plans. That fight is yet to be signed if I'm not mistaken. Hopkins is still considered to be the man a 175, and deservedly so. Jones is merely a contender now adays. A contender that will probably do just as well in pay per view buys as Hopkins, is willing to travel to Wales, and is probably willing to demand a smaller share than Hopkins. To be honest, I think that Calzaghe's chin and work rate make him a more difficult fight for Jones than Tarver was at any time they met. Jones would have to be more active than he was against Trinidad, and I don't know if that is possible at his age.
Trinidad wasn't a natural welterweight, only staying at that weight (with very much trouble of cutting his weight down) to get a big fight, once he got it with Oscar, he immediately jumped up in weight. He is a natural middleweight right now at this age, with Jones being natural super middleweight, only 1 weight category separating them.
Jones looked brilliant at times, but most of the time, his timing seemed very off. During the first two rounds, i really thought he was "shot", but then he sort of came alive and showed glimps of the past. He was very adept at keeping his guard up whenever Tito punched; i'll give him that. After the first few rounds, he was hardly hit with a clean headshot ever in the entire fight. He's lost his legs though. If he's gonna stand in front of Calzaghe like that, he won't win a round because Calzaghe throws so many punches, is more accurate, bigger, more authoritative and actually has a defense. I think part of why Jones looked good was mainly because his opponent was inactive for 2,5 years and a natural super welter at best, who has always been highly susceptible to technically skilled boxers. I think Calzaghe would beat Hopkins fairly easy as well (if he's still as good as he was vs Kessler). His workrate is just too much for Hopkins, who has slowed down way too much to beat Joe at this point. You can have all the technical ability and fouling tactics in the world, but if your opponent throws twice as many punches and is so much faster, you're not gonna win.
Agreed, and i think Hopkins is too far past it now as well to worry a very fast and skillfull opponent in Caz. It will be fascinating to watch his attempted strategies tho. I still wonder about Jones chin of present, it can't have gotten much better than it was when Tarver hit him and i think Tarver is an overrated puncher. Call me stupid but i wouldn't doubt that Caz could take him out, he'll at least be landing plenty of leather and i really don't think Jones at this time can take much. I'll look at the Tito fight tomorrow and see if Felix lands anything significant.
Jones is not even a mere contender now , im not disrespecting him , but he is less than that at the moment. Beating a ATG WW after a layoff at 170 pounds doesnt mean anything in the LHW rankings. It was a good fight though
Roy Jones is former p4p king, former light heavyweight king, and his losses came to two fighters that are still top 10 contenders. The high placement of those opponents is largely due to defeating Jones. Jones is on a 3 fight win streak. He is still a contender.
The main word that you used here is FORMER , he hadnt beaten any1 significant at LHW for ages before he split a 3-fight series with Tarver and lost to Johnson. Tarver, i thought was really good at the time , but it turns out he's not that great. I dont want this to sound like im disrespecting Roy Jones , one of the best fighters maybe ever , but he is not a contender at LHW anymore. He can be a contender again , i think he is still very good/great , but right now he doesnt deserve contender status AT 175 bestowing upon him
Well let's look at the top light heavies, and you tell me why they're so much more deserving. Hopkins- Is the man because he beat Tarver. Clinton Woods- Let's see... He beat Glen Johnson, Julio Gonzalez(Jones Victim), and Woods himself has lost to Jones Tarver- Beat Jones. Beat Johnson, who is considered good because he beat Jones. Johnson- considered good because he split with Tarver, and he defeated Jones. Dawson- Beat Harding, another Jones victim, and he defeated Adamek. Finally, a fighter that did something that wasn't directly or indirectly related to Jones. Until more light heavyweights prove themselves against top fighters in the division, Jones has been active enough to keep a top 10 placing.
Yes , the arguments you have made are good ones , the reason that JONES HIMSELF is not a contender anymore is because his last 3 fights against LHW contenders were convincing losses , that knocks you out of contention. And time has passed also. Im not saying that Jones cant beat most of the guys in his division if he fought them tommorow. I havent said anything like this once. You are mistaking my posts for something else. All im sayin is that right now Jones is not in contention, so your argument you have just made doesnt even count. It would do if we were discussing if Jones is better that the current contenders , but that has nothin to do with this
So, let me get this straight. If you were a champion, then you lose to a couple of fighters that are top 5 in your division, go on a 3 fight win streak at a time when the contenders in your division are doing little if nothing better, appear to be able to defeat some of the contenders around you; you no longer deserve to be a contender. Wow. I'm glad I learned that today.
Just look here at our posts , you are the one trying to put words in my mouth here . Roy was champion , then he beat Tarver. Then he suffered a one-punch KO in a rematch - he is still number 1 contender imo at this point, although he could be lower because in some peoples opinions because he never fought deserving contender Micszachevski for ages. Then he gets KOd by Johnson - he is slipping in the rankings now. Then he fights no1 for over a year and then gets a undeserved title shot and loses convincingly. You would be very kind to have him at number 10 contender at this point. Then he fights 3 people who dont have any business being called anything at 175 (in terms of title contention). Jones is not a 175 contender right now. Deal with it
http://www.fightnews.com/rankings2.htm http://boxingtalk.com/pag/ratings.php It looks like 4 governing bodies, and two news sites believe he is. I'm willing to bet he makes the Rings to 10 when they update. Deal with that.