Roy should take on the winner of Hopkins-Calzaghe fight

jones-hopkins 2 is plausible,but hopkins wont beat calzaghe&jones-calzaghe in 2008 is not only pointless but dangerous

 

In his arrogance Jones would probably still believe he deserved a 60/40 split thus pricing himself out of the fight anyway.

 

Calzaghe recently spoke of one of these:Taylor, Pavlik & Jones being follow up fights after Hopkins. Personally I think he should take Dawson and really silence the doubters even though I don't rate dawson but a W v Jones on his resume will look good to the historians.

 

Do you remember: "60/40 and I whoop your ass, 60/40 and I tear your ass up", man?

Also I cannot think of a bet how about just an avatar bet, anything goes that wont get taken down, you can choose for how long :good

 

I had a feeling that you'd show up after that comment.

Check this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSsbKSjmy_I

Yeah lets go for an avatar bet, what will it be?

 

Yeah seen it, Hopkins was making very unreasonable demands.

Ummm, lets see either 1-3 months, choose the pic at a lter date.

 

he doesn't have the footspeed to trouble calzaghe anymore. jeez, one win over a blown up welter who hasn't fought in over two years and he can give calzaghe his hardest fight. :roll:

 

Lucky for you they don't test boxing sense on the LSAT !

 

No, you probably don't.

But if you scored well on the LSAT, you will be able to deduce why I mentioned it.

In your public profile, you mention law school.

Hence my little dig.



Good luck !

 

^^^^^

No. RJ needs to beat a legitimate top 5 Lt. Heavyweight before considering fighting the winner of Hops vs Calzaghe. Beating Tito was nothing more than a tune up.

 

B-Hop will soon back out, so Calzaghe - Jones will be great to see

 

if he does beat Hopkins of Calzaghe it will be because he took a gun into the ring

 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LSsbKSjmy_I&feature=related

 

I think we will end up seeing Jones Calzaghe only becuase I predict Joe C to beat Hopkins on pts ..