Ruben Carter vs Rodrigo Valdez

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Jun 30, 2009.


  1. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    70
    Aug 18, 2009
    Valdez was ranked inside ring magazine's top 10 4 a longer duration of time so he wins by KO late
     
  2. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    atberry at it again.
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    It's not him :lol:

    Also, please check your inbox when you can be arsed ;-)
     
  4. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    That's a very questionable statement. Valdez never beat anyone on the level of a prime Griffith (Briscoe was the best fighter he beat, and yet he couldn't even beat an ancient Griffith). Personally, I'd say Valdez ranks among the most overrated fighters on this board, right alongside Liston and Ken Buchanan.

    That having been said, Carter was a frontrunner, and if Valdez could take his bombs for the first few rounds, he'd have an excellent shot at coming on strong late to take the fight by decision or late TKO.
     
  5. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    70
    Aug 18, 2009
    But Valdez was a champion and Carter was just a contender .

    Now that's what i expected .
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,215
    49,532
    Apr 27, 2005
    Agreed.
     
  7. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    He did fight Monzon though
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Exactly why the lines get blurred when looking at him IMO.