ruddock,bruno,dokes,mercer,tucker etc, DID FOREMAN DUCK ALL OF THEM???

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by highguard, Nov 20, 2010.


  1. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    I agree, Ruduck I think stops Foreman with that smash left hook the same way he did an old bonecrusher. But a prime Tucker would of dominated Foreman, too mobile and too fast. Tyson stops old Foreman and prime Foreman even easier.
     
  2. lol what a tyson fanboy.... it is because tyson avoided foreman...
    listen .... old foreman90-91 would ko tyson in 6 rounds,but the prime foreman who faced frazier and norton would kill tyson and later he would **** in his face. and cus damato knew it.
    if you want we can do a thread prime tyson vs prime foreman.... you will lose for sure...
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    One man Foreman did not duck was Hassan Shabazz, and he was decked, heavily!!!

    Seriously, Foreman was not interested in anything other than money post 87. If it made financial sense, Foreman would of been quite happy to of fought all of the above...

    But look it like this:

    Tyson and Lewis got to Ruddock.

    Bruno was only after alphabet crap, and found McCall a darn sight easier than Big George.

    Dokes was creamed by Ruddock first.

    Mercer was beaten by the other ol' man.

    Tucker was never a big enough draw for the fight to be worth the risk...​
     
  4. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    No, not fanboy at all, I just know George wouldn't beat him. And Tyson ain't Joe Frazier, he's better, he would get to Frazier faster than Foreman did, because skillfully he's way more of complete fighter in all areas. Just look at Tyson/Marvis Frazier, he'd do the same to Joe.

    And Tyson whoopin his ass back in 91 would of been irrelevent cause people like you would of said he was too old.
     
  5. :rofl:rofl the most stupid explanation that i did read ever.
    bye novice:rofl:rofl
     
  6. i agree absolutely
     
  7. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    Nope, I have watched all of Big Georges fights and Fraziers, and Marvis fought just like him. :roll: I never said Marvis was as good as him but styles make fights and Frazier would try do the same thing marvis did in there fights. And Foreman would lose to any skilled boxer, too one Dimensional.
     
  8. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    He took the safe route because he knew he would of loss a lot of them, the same we he was scared to fight Lennox Lewis. He said it Lennox would of killed him, and you know what a prime Foreman hgets his ass whooped by Lennox too.
     
  9. actually you are the most ridiculous person on this forum, please continues talking... you are exposing the ignorant who you are
     
  10. highguard

    highguard Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,791
    6
    Apr 12, 2010


    do you dream of sucking foreman off every night????

    for real man, its like against the law to talk about him

    you see you base everything on who beat who etc,
    because you dont understand styles, cause you NEVER BOXED SIMPLE

    your an ignorant fanboy


    and briggs, yes i give foreman credit for that, and saverese wow lol


    i am not all about streaght but you say foreman was the strongest
    yet he did not fight the strongest guys of that generation

    simple


    try boxing yourself jackass
    you might learn something
     
  11. hahahaa obviously you are ko, you have no real argument. except your stupid opinion. foreman was in his 40s and he was competent against every young top boxer ,morrison,holyfield,briggs,moorer tyson was destroyed in his prime by the bum buster douglas, past prime holyfield destroyed him twice and he was killed in his 30s by the pork mcbride and the garbage williams:lol:. i am amateur boxer little kid. i am 6´1 and 218 pounds.
    surely you are a ****ing bum, because you know pure **** about boxing and the styles
     
  12. highguard

    highguard Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,791
    6
    Apr 12, 2010

    holy fcuk your stupid,

    bringing up tyson in last most washed up days against mcbride wow

    ahh lets see

    foreman could not hurt a glass jawed morrison

    holyfield great fighter but former cruiseweight

    moorer good fighter but again former light heavyweight


    and your not an boxer because they dont allow boxing in the special
    olympics


    and 6'1 218, we are kinda similar in size if your not liar
    anytime bro your in town, come to my gym




    bottom line is what foreman did in his 40's was great
    but he was a guy who depended on being the stronger fighter
    in the ring

    THUSLY HE WISELY DID NOT FIGHT GUYS WHO COULD MATCH IN
    STREAGHT.....

    how you dont see this is beyond me