Russian strength training

LOL!?

....I'm starting to get a hunch on some of our members' demographics.

 

Lol^^

 

^^ That was pretty damn funny

 

Okay, I have a ton of material on the matter. I'll leak it throughout the week if I hve time, but for sure this weekend.

 

Soviet athletes have ALWAYS been masters of a lot of different sports.
You can be sure the weightlifters did some shotput, some sprinting, and some boxing to name but a few.
Hence, you can be sure the boxers did some sprinting, some athletics probably, some jumping, and some weightlifting.
I think doing a few other sports to complement the one you are focusing on is a good idea, instead of just a "rest" day.

 

how old is this thread

 

INTENSITY OF STRENGTH
TRAINING FACTS AND THEORY:
RUSSIAN AND EASTERN
EUROPEAN APPROACH
Vladmir M. Zatsiorsky, Ph.D.
Biomechanics Lab The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
Pennsylvania and Central Institute of Physical Culture-Moscow, Russia
Re-printed with permission by the author.
Many attempts have been made to determine which training is more effective,
lifting maximal or intermediate weights. This is similar to the question of whether
800-meter runners should train at distances shorter or longer than 800 meters. It
is advisable to run both. The same holds true for strength training; exercises with
different resistances must be employed.
The objective of this paper is to describe and explain the training routine
employed by elite Russian and Bulgarian weightlifters. Athletes from these
countries have won almost all of the gold medals at the World and Olympic
championships over the last 25 years.
Three main problems exist in strength conditioning of elite athletes:
1. Selection of exercises used by an athlete;
2. Training load, in particular training intensity and volume; and
3. Training timing, i.e. the distribution of the exercises and load over the time
periods.
The training intensity of elite athletes is the only problem covered in this article.
Exercise Intensity Measurement
Exercise intensity during heavy resistance training can be estimated in four ways:
1. Magnitude of resistance, i.e., weight lifted, expressed as a percentage of
the best achievement (FM) in relevant movement. Expressing the weight
lifted in kg, it is difficult to compare the training load of athletes of various
skill levels and from different weight classes.
2. Number of repetitions (lifts) per set (a set is a group of repetitions
performed consecutively).
3. Number (or percentage) of repetitions with maximal resistance (weight).
4. Workout density, i.e. the number of sets per one-hour workout.
The first three methods are described below:
1. To characterize the magnitude of resistance (load), use the percentage of
the weight lifted relative to the best performance. Depending on how the
best achievement is determined, two main variants of such a measure are
utilized. The athletic performance attained during an official sport
competition (competition FM = CFM) is used as a “best performance” in the
first case. In the second, a so called maximum training weight (TFM) is
used for comparison.
By definition, maximum training weight is the heaviest weight (one
repetition maximum - 1 RM) which can be lifted by an athete without
substantial emotional stress. In practice, experienced athletes determine
TFM by registering heart rate. An increase in heart rate before the lift is a
sign of emotional anxiety. The weight exceeds TFM in this case. The
difference between the TFM and the CFM is approximately 12.5 +/- 2.5
percent for superior weight lifters. The difference is greater among
athletes in heavy weight classes. In the case of an athlete who lifts 200 kg
during competition, 180 kg weight is typically above his TFM.
The difference between CFM and TFM is great. After an important
competition, weight lifters are extremely tired, although they perform only
six lifts in comparison to nearly 100 during a regular training session. The
athletes have a feeling of “emptiness”and they cannot lift large volumes of
weight. The athletes need about one week of rest and may compete in the
next important competition only after one month of rest and training
(compared with other sports in which athletes compete two to three times
a week). The reason for this is the great emotional stress while lifting CFM,
rather than the physical load itself. TFM can be lifted at each training
session.
It is more practical to use CFM rather than TFM for the calculation of
training intensity. In a sport such as weight lifting, the training intensity is
characterized by an intensity coefficient.
average weight lifted, kg.
intensity coefficient =
athletic performance
(Snatch plus clean and jerk), kg
On average, the intensity coefficient for superior Russian athletes is 38 +/-
2 percent.
It is recommended to use a CFM value (the average of the two
performances attained during official contests) immediately before and
after the studied period of training. For instance, if the performance was
100 kg during a competition in December and it was 110 kg in May, the
average CFM for the January - April period was 105 kg.
There are many misconceptions in sports science literature regarding
weight loads used in heavy resistance training. One reason is that the
difference between CFM and TFM is not always completely described. The
reader must be attentive to this difference.
Figure 1: The distribution of weights lifted by members of the National Olympic
team of the USSR during preparation for the 1988 Olympic Winter Games; one
year of direct observations. (From: ‘Preparation of National Olympic team in
weight lifting to the 1988 Olympic Games in Seoul.’ Technical report #1988-67,
All-Union Research Institute of Physical Culture, Moscow, 1989)
2. The number of repetitions per set (repetition maximum - RM) is a popular
measure of intensity in exercise where maximal force (FM) is difficult or
even impossible to evaluate, such as sit-ups.
The magnitude of resistance (weight, load) may be characterized by the
ultimate number of repetitions possible in one set (to failure). RM
determination entails utilizing a trial-and-error process to find the greatest
amount of weight a trainee can lift a designated number of times. RM is a
very convenient measure of training intensity in heavy resistance training.
However, there is no fixed relationship between the magnitude of the
weight lifted (expressed as a percentage of the FM in relevant movement)
and the number of repetitions to failure (RM). The relationship varies with
different athletes and motions.
Thus, 10 RM corresponds to approximately 75 percent of FM. This is valid
for athletes in sports in which strength and explosive strength are
predominate qualities (weight lifting, sprinting, jumping, throwing, etc.).

 

However, it should be taken into account that a given percent of 1 RM will
not always elicit the same number of repetitions to failure when performing
different lifts.
During training, elite athletes use varying numbers of repetitions in
different lifts.
3. The number for repetitions with maximal resistance is used as an
additional measure of the intensity of strength training. All lifts with a
barbell above 90 percent of CFM are included in this category. These
loads are above TFM for most athletes.
Intensity of training
The practical training experience of elite athletes is a very useful source of
information in sports science. This experience, while it does not provide sound
scientific proof of the optimum results that can be expected from the employed
training routines, reflects the most efficient training techniques known at the time.
The distribution of training weights in the conditioning of elite weight lifters is
shown in Figure 1. Elite athletes use a broad spectrum of different loads. The
loads below 60 percent of CFM are used mainly for warming up and restitution
(they account for eight percent of all the lifts). The main portion of weights lifted
(25 percent) is 70 to 80 percent of the CFM . The loads above 90 percent of CFM
account for only seven percent of all lifts.
According to numerous observations, the average training intensity for elite
Russian athletes is 75 +/- 2 percent of the CFM. Athletes from other countries
often use higher or lower training weights. For instance, Finnish weight lifting
champions exercise (1987) at an average intensity of 80 +/- 2.5 percent.
The number of repetitions per, set varies by exercise. In both the snatch and
clean and jerk lifts (Figure 2), the major parts of all sets are performed with 1-3
repetitions. In the snatch, only 1.8 percent of the sets are done with three four
repetitions; in the clean, the percentage of sets with four through six lifts is not
more than 5.4 percent. The majority of sets, roughly from 55 to 60 percent,
comprise two repetitions.
In auxiliary strength exercises, such as squatting with a barbell, in which motor
coordination only partially resembles the coordination in the snatch squats, the
range is from two to seven lifts per set (more than 93 percent of all sets are
performed in this range, Figure 3).
Generally, as the intermuscular coordination in an exercise becomes more
simple, and as the technique of the exercise deviates from the technique of the
main event (in this example, from the technique of both the snatch and clean and
jerk), the greater the number of repetitions. In the clean and jerk, it is one to three
(54.4 percent of sets were with two lifts only); the typical number of reps in
squatting is three to five, and in the inverse curl the average number of lifts is five
to seven per set (Figure 4).
The numbers of repetitions with maximal resistance (CFM) are relatively low.
During the 1984 -1988 Olympic training cycle, elite Russian athletes lifted a
barbell of maximal weight in main exercises (snatch, clean, and jerk) 300 to 600
times a year. This amount comprised 1.5 - 3.0 percent of all their lifts. These
weights were distributed as follows:
Weight of Barbell Number of lifts
(Percent of CFM) (Percent)
90 - 92.5 65
92.6 - 97.5 20
97.6 - 100 15
Total 100
In a one-month period before important competitions, weights above 90 percent
of CFM are lifted in the snatch and / or clean and jerk 40 to 60 times.
During the 1980s, Russian and Bulgarian weight lifting teams won almost all of
the gold medals at World and Olympic competitions. It has been reported many
times that Bulgarian athletes lift barbells of maximal weight more than 4,000
times a year. The training intensity of Bulgarian athletes is actually higher than it
is for Russian athletes. However, the real source of such a huge discrepancy
(600 versus 4,000 lifts a year) is not the training itself, but the method of
determining maximal weight. Russian athletes use CFM in their plans and logs,
while Bulgarians stick to TFM (1 RM in a given training session).
The aforementioned integers should not be mechanically copied. Rather, the
underlying concept of such training must be understood and practiced.
The concept was formulated in 1970 and has since been used as a theoretical
background for strength conditioning of elite athletes. Though the concept is not
scientifically validated in detail (it should be considered as a hypothesis rather
than a scientific theory), it is useful from a practical standpoint. When training
elite athletes, it is impossible to wait until scientific research provides all of the
necessary knowledge.
The training concept is based on the idea that strength manifestation is
determined by two latent factors:
1. Peripheral muscles and
2. Central coordination.
These factors should be trained in different ways. It is assumed that there is no
optimal exercise intensity to develop maximal strength, however, it is possible to
choose an exercise intensity which is optimal for the improvement of either
peripheral or central factors.
Causes and Effects in Strength Manifestation
The following briefly explains biological mechanisms which form the basis of
training:
Peripheral Factors-Muscles
The capacity of a muscle to produce force depends on its physiological crosssectional
area, and in particular on the number of muscle fibers. Muscle size
increases primarily as a result of increases in individual fiber size and not by fiber
gain (through fiber splitting).
Two types of muscle fiber hypertrophy can be schematically discerned,
sarcoplasmic and myofibril (Figure 5).
1. Sarcoplasmic Hypertrophy of muscle fibers is characterized by the growth
of sarcoplasmic (semi-fluid interfibrillar substance) and non-contractile
protein which do not contribute directly to the production of muscle force.
Specifically, filament area density in the muscle fibers decreases, while
the cross-sectional area of the muscle fibers increases without an
accompanying increase in muscle strength.
2. Myofibrillar Hypertrophy is defined as an enlargement of the muscle fiber
size by gaining more myofibrils and, at the same time, more actin and
myosin filaments. Furthermore, contractile proteins are synthesized and
filament density increases. This type of fiber hypertrophy leads to
increased muscle force production.
Except for very special cases, when the aim of heavy resistance training is to
achieve body weight gains, athletes are interested myofibrillar hypertrophy.
Training must be organized in a manner to stimulate synthesis of contractile
protein and to increase filament muscle density.
It is assumed that exercise activates protein catabolism (break down of muscle
proteins) creatine conditions for the enhanced synthesis of contractile proteins
during the rest period (break down and build up theory). During the strength
exercise, muscle proteins are forcefully converted into more simple substances
(breaking down); during restitution (anabolic phase) the synthesis of muscle
proteins is vitalized. Fiber hypertrophy is considered to be a supercompensation
of muscle proteins.
The mechanisms involved in muscle protein synthesis, including the initial stimuli
triggering the increased synthesis of contractile proteins, have not been well
established.
A few hypotheses, popular among coaches 20 to 30 years ago but completely
disregarded today, include:
1. The blood over-circulation hypothesis suggests that increased blood
circulation in working muses is the triggering stimulus for muscle growth.
One of the most popular methods of body building training, called flushing,
is based on this assumption. It has been shown, however, that active
muscle hyperemization (i.e. increase in the quantity of blood flowing
through a muscle) caused by physical therapeutic means does not, in
itself, lead to the activation of protein synthesis.
2. The muscle hypoxia hypothesis, contrary to the theory described above,
stipulates that deficiency, not abundance, of blood and oxygen in muscle
tissue during strength exercises triggers protein synthesis. Muscle
arterioles and capillaries are compressed during resistive exercise and
blood supply to an active muscle is restricted. Blood is not conveyed to
muscle tissue if the tension exceeds approximately 60 percent of maximal
muscle force.
However, by inducing a hypoxic state in muscles it has been shown that
oxygen shortage does not stimulate an increase in muscle size.
Professional pearl divers, synchronized swimmers and others who
regularly perform low intensity movements in oxygen-deficient conditions
do not have hypertrophied muscles.
3. The ATP-debt theory is based on the assumption that ATP concentration
is decreased after heavy resistive exercise (about 15 repetitions in 20
seconds per set were recommended for training). However, recent
findings indicate that even in a completely exhausted muscle, the ATP
level does not change.

 

Energetical Theory
Finally, the energetical theory of muscle hypertrophy appears more realistic and
appropriate for practical training, despite the fact that it is not validated in detail.
According to this theory, the crucial factor for increasing protein catabolism is a
shortage of energy in the muscle cell that is available for protein synthesis during
heavy strength exercise. Synthesis of muscle proteins requires a substantial
amount of energy. The synthesis of one peptide bond, for instance, requires
energy liberated during hydrolysis of ATP molecules. For each instant in time,
only a given amount of energy is available in a muscle cell. This energy is spent
for anabolism of muscle proteins and muscular work. Normally, the amount of
energy available in a muscle cell satisfies these two requirements. During heavy
resistive exercise, however, almost all of the available energy is conveyed to the
contractile elements of muscle and spent for muscular work (Figure 6).
Since the energy supply for the synthesis of proteins decreases, protein
degradation increases. The uptake of amino acids from the blood into muscles is
depressed during exercise, while the mass of proteins catabolized during heavy
resistive exercise exceeds the mass of protein that is newly synthesized. As a
result, the amount of muscle protein decreases somewhat after a strength
workout and the amount of protein catabolized (estimated, for instance, by the
concentration of non-protein nitrogen in the blood) rises above its resting value.
Between training sessions, protein synthesis is then increased. The uptake of
amino acids from the blood into muscles is above resting values. This repeated
process of enhanced degradation and synthesis of contractile proteins may result
in super-compensation of protein (Figure 7). This principle is similar to the
overcompensation of muscle glycogen that occurs in response to endurance
training.
Whatever the mechanism for stimulating muscle hypertrophy, the vital
parameters of a training routine that induce such results are exercise intensity -
the exerted muscular force - and exercise volume - the total number of
repetitions, performed mechanical work, etc.
Intra-muscular Coordination
The nervous system uses three options for varying muscle force production:
1. Recruitment — gradation of total muscle force by addition and subtraction
of active motor units;
2. Rate coding — changing the firing rate of motor units; and
3. Synchronization — activation of motor units in a more or less
synchronized way. Motor units (MU) can be classified as fast or slow on
the basis of contractile properties.
Slow MU, or slow twitch (ST) motor units, are specialized for prolonged usage at
relatively slow velocities. They consist of small, low threshold motoneurons with
low discharge frequencies, axons with relatively low conduction velocities and
motor fibers highly adapted to lengthy aerobic activities.
Fast MU, or fast twitch (FT) motor units, are specialized for relatively brief
periods of activity characterized by large power outputs, high velocities and high
rates of force development. They consist of large high threshold motoneurons
with high discharge frequencies, axons with high conduction velocities and motor
fibers adapted to explosive or anaerobic activities.
MU’s are activated in accordance with the all-or-none law: at any point in time,
the MU is either active, or it is inactive. There is no gradation in the level of
motoneuron excitation. The gradation of force of one MU occurs through
changes in its firing rate (rate coding).
In humans, contraction times vary from 90 to 110 milliseconds for ST motor units
and from 40 to 84 milliseconds for FT motor units. The maximal shortening
velocity (VM) of FT fibers is almost four times greater than the VM of ST motor
fibers. The force per unit area of fast and slow motor fibers is similar; however
the FT motor units typically possess larger cross-sectional areas and produce
greater force per motor unit.
Almost all human muscles contain both ST and FT motor units, but the proportion
of fast and slow MU’s in mixed muscles varies among athletes. Endurance
athletes have a high percentage of ST motor units, while FT motor units are
predominant among strength and power athletes.
Recruitment. It is accepted in strength training, that during voluntary contraction,
the orderly pattern of recruitment is controlled by the size of motoneurons (socalled
size principle). Small motoneurons with the lowest threshold are recruited
first and demands for larger forces are met by the recruitment of an increasingly
forceful MU. The MU’swith the largest motoneurons, those which possess the
largest and fastest twitch contractions, have the highest threshold and are
recruited last. This implies, in mixed muscles containing both ST and FT motor
units, that the involvement of motor units is forced, regardless of the magnitude
of muscle tension and velocity being developed. On the contrary, full FT motor
unit activation is difficult to achieve. Untrained people cannot recruit all of their FT
motor units. Increased motor unit activation is observed in athletes engaged in
strength and power training.
The recruitment order of MU’s is relatively fixed for a muscle involved in a
specific motion, even if the movement velocity or rate of force development is
altered. However, the recruitment order can be changed if the multifunction
muscles operate in different motions. Different sets of MU’s within one muscle
might have a low threshold for one motion and a higher threshold for another.
The variation in recruitment order is partially responsible for the specificity of
training effect in heavy resistance exercise. If the object of interest in training is
full development of a muscle (not high athletic performance), one must exercise
this muscle in all its possible ranges of motion. This situation is typical for
bodybuilders and novice athletes, but not elite athletes.
Rate Coding. This is a considered the primary mechanism for the gradation of
muscle force. The discharge frequency of motoneurons can vary over a
considerable range. However, generally the firing rate increases with increased
force and power production.
The relative contribution of recruitment versus rate coding in grading the force of
voluntary contractions is different in small and large muscles. In small muscles,
most MU’s are recruited at the level of force less than 50 percent of FM;
thereafter, rate coding plays the major role in further development of force up to
FM. In large proximal muscles, such as the deltoid and biceps, the recruitment of
additional MU’s appears to be the main mechanism for increasing force
development up to 80 percent of FM and even higher. In the force range between
90 and 100 percent of FM, force is increased almost exclusively by intensifying
the firing rate of MU.
Synchronization. Normally MU’s work asynchronously to produce smooth,
accurate movement. However, there is some evidence that in elite power and
strength athletes MU’s are activated synchronously during maximal voluntary
efforts.
In conclusion, maximal muscular force is achieved when the maximal number of
both ST and FT MU’s are recruited, rate coding is optimal to produce a fused
tetanus in each of the motor fibers and MU’s work synchronously over the short
period of maximum voluntary effort.
The psychological factors are also of primary importance. Under extreme
circumstances, i.e. in a “life-or-death” situation, people may develop
extraordinary strength. When untrained subjects (not superior athletes!) are given
hypnotic suggestions of increased strength, strength increases are found,
whereas strength decrements are shown both by athletes and untrained people
after hypnotic suggestion of decreased strength. Such a strength enhancement is
interpreted to mean that the central nervous system, in extraordinary situations
(extreme fear, hypnosis, etc.), either increases the flow of excitatory stimuli or
decreases the inhibitory influence to the motoneurons.
It may be speculated that the activity of motor neurons of the spinal cord is
normally inhibited by the central nervous system and it is not possible to activate
all of the motor units within a muscle group. Under the influence of strength
training and under exceptional circumstances, important sport competitions
included, a reduction in neural inhibition occurs with the accompanied expansion
of the recruitable motoneuron pool and increase in strength.
Exercising With Different Resistance
When exercising with varying levels of resistance (weights), differences exist in
both metabolic reactions and neural coordination.

 

Metabolic Reactions. According to the “energetic hypothesis” of muscle cell
hypertrophy described above, the crucial factor determining the balance between
protein catabolism and anabolism is the amount of energy available for protein
synthesis during exercise. If the resistance is relatively small, the energy
available in the muscle cell is conveyed for muscle action and at the same time
for anabolism of muscle proteins. Thus, the energy supply satisfies both
requirements. During heavy weight lifting, a greater amount of energy is provided
to the contractile muscle elements and spent on muscular work. Energy transfer
for the synthesis of proteins decreases, while the rate of protein breakdown (the
amount of degraded protein per one lift) increases. The rate of protein
degradation is a function of the weight lifted; the heavier the weight, the higher
the rate of protein degradation.
The total amount of degradated protein is, however, the function of both the rate
of protein catabolism and the mechanical work performed or the total weight
lifted. The mechanical work is greater if resistance is moderate and if several
consecutive lifts are performed in one set. For instance, if an athlete presses a
100 kg barbell one time (it is his 1 RM), the total weight lifted is also 100 kg.
However, if he lifts a 75 kg barbell to failure, and he can lift it about 10 times, the
total weight lifted equals, in this case, 750 kg.
The mass of protein catabolized during heavy resistive exercise can be
presented as a product of the rate of protein breakdown and the number of lifts. If
the resistance is very large, such as 1 RM, the rate of the protein breakdown is
high but the number of repetitions is small. At the other extreme, if the resistance
is small (50 RM), the number of lifts and mechanical work are great, but the rate
of protein degradation is very small. So the total amount of the degradated
protein is small in both cases but for different reasons. The optimal (for inducing
maximal changes in protein metabolism) solution is somewhere in the range of
five and six through 10-12 RM (Table 1).
An additional feature of such training, which is important from a practical
standpoint, is that a very high training volume (or the total amount of weight lifted
during a workout), is five to six times greater than during a conventional training
routine. Athletes who train over a certain period of time in this manner (to gain
body weight and induce muscle cell hypertrophy in order to compete in a heavier
weight class) amass a training volume in one workout over 20-30 tons and in
some cases above 50 tons per day. Such a training volume hinders the athlete’s
capacity to perform other exercises during this period of training.
Coordination. When lifting maximal weight, the maximum number of MU’s are
activated, the fastest MU’s are recruited, the discharge frequency of
motoneurons is at its highest and MU activity is synchronous.
However, MU’s exist that many athletes cannot recruit or raise to the optimal
firing rate intensity to develop maximal force.

 

The “hidden potential” of a human muscle to develop higher force can also be
demonstrated by electro-stimulation. In experiments during maximum voluntary
contraction, the muscle is stimulated with electrical current that induces an
increase in the force production. This indicates that human muscles typically
have hidden reserves for maximal force production that have not been used
during voluntary efforts.
One objective of heavy resistance training is to teach an athlete to recruit all the
necessary MU’s at a firing rate that is optimal for producing a fused tetanus in
each motor fuser.
When lifting sub-maximal weight, an intermediate number of MU’s are activated,
the fastest MU’s are not recruited, the discharge frequency of the motoneurons is
submaximal; and MU activity is asynchronous. The difference in intramuscular
coordination between exercises with maximal versus sub-maximal weight lifting,
are evident. Accordingly, exercises with moderate resistance are not an effective
training means for strength development, particularly when improvement of
intramuscular coordination is desired.
In the preparation of elite weight lifters, the optimal intramuscular coordination is
realized when weights equal to or above TFM are used in workouts. It is not
mandatory from this standpoint to lift CFM during training sessions. Differences in
the best performance attained during training sessions (i.e. TFM) and during
important competition (i.e. CFM) are explained by psychological factors, such as
the level of arousal and by increased rest before a contest. Differences in
coordination (intra and intermuscular), however, do not affect performance.
Weights above TFM are only used sporadically in training (four to seven percent
of all the lifts).
The differences in underlying physiological mechanisms, while exercising with
various loads, explain why muscular strength only increases when exercises
requiring high forces are used in training. In principle, workloads must be above
those normally encountered. The resistance must continually be increased as
gains in strength are made (the principle of progressive-resistance exercises).
In untrained people, the strength levels fall when resistance is below 20 percent
of their FM. In athletes who are used to great muscular efforts, reduced strength
may result even if they use relatively heavy loads, although lower than their
usual level. For instance, if qualified weight lifters train with weights of 60 to 85
percent TFM and not lift these loads in one set to failure (to fatigue), the strength
level is kept constant over the first month of such training and drops five to
seven percent during the second month. Athletes in seasonal or winter sports,
such as rowing, lose the strength level previously attained in the preparation
period if they do not use high resistance training during a competition period,
regardless of intense specific workouts.
Only muscle size, not muscular strength, may be retrained with moderate (nonmaximal)
resistances and moderate (non-maximal) repetition in qualified athletes
over a period of several months.
Methods of Strength Training
Strength training is classified according to methods of attaining maximal
muscular tension which can be attained in one of three ways:
1. Method of maximum efforts. Lifting a maximum load (exercising against
maximal resistance).
2. Method of repeated efforts. Lifting a non-maximal load to failure; during
the latest repetitions the muscles develop the maximum force possible in
the fatiguing state.
3. Method of dynamic efforts. Lifting, throwing, etc. a non-maximal load with
the highest attainable speed.
In addition, the lifting of non-maximal loads an intermediate number of times (not
to failure) is used as a supplementary training method (method of sub-maximal
efforts).
Methods of maximum efforts.
Considered superior for improving both intramuscular and intermuscular
coordination. The method of maximum effort should be used to bring forth the
greatest strength increments. Central nervous system inhibition, if it exists, is
reduced with this method; thus, the maximal numbers of MU’s areactivated with
optimal discharge frequency and the biomechanical parameters of movement
and intermuscular coordination are similar to analogous values in a main sport
exercise. A trainee then “learns” to enhance and to “memorize” these changes in
motor coordination (evidently on an unconscious level).
It was previously mentioned that the magnitude of resistance should be close to
TFM while employing this training method. To avoid high emotional stress, CFM
must be included into the training routine only intermittently. If the aim of a
training drill is to train movement (i.e. both intramuscular and intermuscular
coordination are the object of training), the recommended number of repetitions
per set is one to three. Exercises such as the snatch or the clean and jerk may
serve as an example (Figure 2). When training muscles, rather than movement
training, is the drill objective (i.e., the biomechanical parameters of the exercise
and intermuscular coordination are not of primary importance since the drill is not
specific and its technique is different from the sport technique of the main
exercise) the number of repetitions increases. One example is the inverse curl
(Figure 5), in which the typical number of repetitions is four to eight.
The method of maximum efforts, while a popular method among elite athletes,
has several limitations.
The main limitation is the high risk of injury. Because of this, it cannot be
recommended for beginners. Only after proper technique of an exercise (i.e.
barbell squat) is acquired and the relevant muscles (spinal erectors and
abdomen) are adequately developed, can maximal weights be lifted. In some
exercises, such as sit-ups, this method is rarely used.
The method of maximum efforts, when employed with a small number of
repetitions (one or two), has the limited ability to induce muscle hypertrophy. This
is because only a minor amount of mechanical work is performed and in turn, the
amount of contractile proteins degradated is limited.
Due to the high motivational level needed to lift maximal weights, athletes can
easily become burned out. The staleness syndrome is characterized by
decreased vigor, elevated anxiety and depression, sensation of fatigue in the
morning hours and increased perception of effort while lifting a fixed weight, etc.
High blood pressure at rest is also a further symptom. This response is typical if
CFM, rather than TFM, are used too often in workouts. Staleness depends not
only on the weight lifted but also on the type of exercise used. It is easier to lift
maximal weights in the bench press, in which the barbell can simply be fixed and
the leg and trunk muscles are not activated, than in the jerk, where demands for
the activation of leg and trunk muscles, balance and arousal are much higher.

 

Sub-maximal efforts and repeated efforts
These methods differ only in the number of repetitions per set — intermediate for
sub-maximal efforts and maximal (to failure) for repeated efforts.
The stimulation of muscle hypertrophy is similar between the two methods.
According to the energetic hypothesis described above, two factors are of
primary importance to induce a discrepancy in the amount of degraded and
newly synthesized proteins. Those factors are the rate of protein degradation and
the total value of performed mechanical work. If the number of lifts is not
maximal, mechanical work somewhat diminishes. However, if the amount of work
is relatively close to maximal values (i.e., if 10 lifts are performed instead of the
maximum 12 possible) then the difference is not crucial. It may be compensated,
for example, by shortening the time intervals between sequential sets. It
is a common belief that the maximal number of repetitions in a set is desirable,
but not required, for inducing muscle hypertrophy.
The situation is different if the main objective of a heavy resistance drill is to learn
a proper pattern of muscle coordination.
This issue is analyzed in the following example (Figure 8):
Suppose an athlete is lifting a 12 RM barbell with a given rate of one lift per
second. The muscle subjected to training consists of MU’s having different
endurance times from one to, for example, 100 seconds (in reality, some slow
MU’s have much longer endurance times; they may be active dozens of minutes
without any sign of fatigue). The maximal number of lifts until fatigue among
MU’s varies from one to 100. If the athlete lifts the barbell only one time, one
division of the MU’s is recruited and the second is not (Figure 8). According to
the size principle, the slow, fatigue-resistant MU’s are recruited first (theslow
MU’s are shown at the bottomof MU columns, Figure 8). After several lifts, some
of the shortest endurance times become exhaust. After six repetitions, for
instance, only the MU’s withendurance times less than six seconds are
exhausted. Since the exhausted MU’s now cannot develop the same tension as
at the beginning, new MU’s are recruited. These newly recruited MU’s are fast
and non-resistant to fatigue. Thus, they may become exhausted very quickly. If
only 10 lifts of 12 maximum possible are performed, the entire population of MU’s
is divided into three divisions (Intermediate lift column, Figure 8). The three
divisions of MU’s are:
1. MU’s that are recruited but not fatigued are not trained. All MU endurance
times above 10 seconds are in this category. Evidently, this subpopulation
consists of slow MU’s. Therefore, it can be concluded that it is
very difficult to increase the maximal force of the slow MU’s which are
fatigue resistant.
2. Only MU’s which are recruited and exhausted. Only these MU’s are
subjected to training stimulus in this set. These MU’s possess
intermediate features; there are no slowest, although recruited, and fastest
MU’s, which are not recruited all, in this sub-population. The “corridor”of
MU’s that are subjected to atraining stimulus may be more narrow or
more broad. This depends on the weight lifted and on the number of
repetitions in a set. One objective of a strength program can be to
increase the sub-population of MU’s influenced by training, or to increase
the corridor.
3. MU’s that are not recruited or trained.
If the exercise is performed to failure (method of repeated efforts), the picture is
changed in the final lifts. A maximal number of available MU’s is now recruited.
All MU’s are divided into two subpopulations: exhausted (fatigued) and nonexhausted
(non-fatigued) with a substantial training effect on the first group only.
If the total number of repetitions is below 12, all the MU’s with endurance times
above 12 seconds fall into the second group. In spite of their early recruitment
(due to the higher endurance), these MU’s are not exhausted.
When maximal weights are lifted (method of maximal efforts), the MU’s “corridor”
includes a smaller number of MU’s (Figure 8) than if a sub-maximal weight is
lifted a maximum possible number of repetitions. This is certainly a disadvantage
for the method of maximal efforts. Only fast MU’s are subject to the training effect
in this case. However, the advantage of this method (see above) outweighs any
drawbacks.
If the method of repeated efforts is used, the weight must be lifted with sincere
exertions to failure (maximum number of times). This requirement is very
important. The popular jokes among coaches are: “Lift the barbell as many times
as you can and after that three more times,” and “no pain, no gain” I reflect the
demand very well. With this method, only final lifts in which a maximal number of
MU’s are recruited are actually useful. If an athlete can lift a barbell 12 times but
lifts only 10, the exercise set is worthless.
In comparison with the method of maximal efforts, the method of repeated efforts
has certain pros and cons. Three advantages are most important:
1. A greater influence on muscle metabolism and consequently on the
inducement of muscle hypertrophy;
2. The greater sub-population of the trained MU’s (the “corridor”, compare
the two right columns in Figure 8); and
3. A relatively low injury risk.
This method has two limitations:
1. The final lifts in a set are performed when the muscles are tired. Thus, this
training alone is less effective than the lifting of maximal weights; and
2. Very high training volume (the total amount of weight lifted) restricts the
application of this method in the training of elite athletes.
All of the methods discussed should be used in the strength training of elite
athletes.
Method of Dynamic efforts
It is impossible to attain FM in fast movement against intermediate resistance.
Therefore, the method of dynamic efforts is not used for increasing maximal
strength. It is employed only to improve the rate of force development and
explosive strength.
Practical Recommendations
In conclusion, the following methods are used to increase maximum strength FM:
To improve neuro-muscular coordination (MU recruitment, rate coding, MU
synchronization, entire coordination pattern), use the method of maximal efforts
as the first choice and the method of repeated efforts, as the second.
To stimulate muscle hypertrophy, use the methods of repeated efforts and / or
method of sub-maximal efforts.
To increase the“corridor” of recruited and trained MU’s, use the method of
repeated efforts.

 

Hmm you know what else I noticed.. or maybe it's just me. The Russians are slick mother ****ers too

 

There's nothing particularly awesome about Russians. Seriously.

I read Fedor's book once, in the intro it says that they have a such a large talent pool, they basically spend the first few weeks weeding out the weak so they're only left with the strongest and most game athletes for training. Apart from that the strength training is nothing particularly new. You can find similar theory presented in Zatiorsky's 'Science and Practice of strength training' or Rippetoe's 'Starting Strength' or 'Practical Programming' or even Wendler's '5/3/1'. There are no silver bullets, the Russians (if all of them even do) simply train for strength where the vast majority of UK and USA boxers are taught not to.

^In fact for strength training I would highly reccommend all of those titles.